Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 January 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:41-48 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burow, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Xin, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burow, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Xin, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burow, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Xin, Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Genetic and Physiological Analysis of an Irradiated Bloomless Mutant (Epicuticular Wax Mutant) of Sorghum

G. B. Burowa,b,*, C. D. Franksa,b and Z. Xina

a USDA-ARS, Plant Stress & Germplasm Development Unit, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, 3810 4th St., Lubbock, TX 79415
b contributed equally to this work. Inquiries about seeds and the population used in this study should be addressed to Dr. C.D. Franks. Mention of trade name does not constitute endorsement of the product to the exclusion of similar products by the USDA

* Corresponding author (gburow{at}lbk.ars.usda.gov).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
An irradiation-induced bloomless mutant of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.], KFS2021, which visually exhibits an absence of white fluffy epicuticular wax in leaf and sheath, was characterized using a combination of genetic and physiological approaches. Study of the phenotypic segregation for the bloomless trait in F2 and F2:3 populations from a cross between KFS2021 and BTx623 (a cultivar with bloom showing profuse deposition of white epicuticular wax) suggests that bloomless is controlled by a single nuclear recessive gene. The bloomless parent (KFS2021) and F2 individuals had lower frequency of guttation, leakier epidermal layer (based on percentage of chlorophyll leaching), and higher rate of seedling water loss than the BTx623 and F2 bloom individuals. Bloomless F2 individuals showed 3- to 6-fold higher nighttime transpiration rates relative to F2 bloom individuals based on nighttime conductance. Correlation analysis showed significant negative associations between leaf epicuticular wax load with epidermal permeability and nighttime conductance, which indicate the important role of epicuticular wax in these traits. These results suggest that epicuticular wax may enhance water use efficiency of sorghum by regulating nighttime water loss.

Abbreviations: DW, dry weight • EW, epicuticular wax • EWL, epicuticular wax load • FW, initial fresh weight • RWC, relative water content • TW, turgid weight



    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert Klein, SPARC, USDA-ARS, College Station, TX, for generously providing the mutant seeds used in the study. The authors also acknowledge Halee Hughes, Lindsey Fox, Charles Woodfin, Naomi Kaskela, and Lance Layton for excellent technical assistance.


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication March 2, 2007.

Genetic and Physiological Analysis of an Irradiated Bloomless Mutant (Epicuticular Wax Mutant) of Sorghum

G. B. Burowa,b,*, C. D. Franksa,b and Z. Xina

a USDA-ARS, Plant Stress & Germplasm Development Unit, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, 3810 4th St., Lubbock, TX 79415
b contributed equally to this work. Inquiries about seeds and the population used in this study should be addressed to Dr. C.D. Franks. Mention of trade name does not constitute endorsement of the product to the exclusion of similar products by the USDA

* Corresponding author (gburow{at}lbk.ars.usda.gov).

An irradiation-induced bloomless mutant of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.], KFS2021, which visually exhibits an absence of white fluffy epicuticular wax in leaf and sheath, was characterized using a combination of genetic and physiological approaches. Study of the phenotypic segregation for the bloomless trait in F2 and F2:3 populations from a cross between KFS2021 and BTx623 (a cultivar with bloom showing profuse deposition of white epicuticular wax) suggests that bloomless is controlled by a single nuclear recessive gene. The bloomless parent (KFS2021) and F2 individuals had lower frequency of guttation, leakier epidermal layer (based on percentage of chlorophyll leaching), and higher rate of seedling water loss than the BTx623 and F2 bloom individuals. Bloomless F2 individuals showed 3- to 6-fold higher nighttime transpiration rates relative to F2 bloom individuals based on nighttime conductance. Correlation analysis showed significant negative associations between leaf epicuticular wax load with epidermal permeability and nighttime conductance, which indicate the important role of epicuticular wax in these traits. These results suggest that epicuticular wax may enhance water use efficiency of sorghum by regulating nighttime water loss.

Abbreviations: DW, dry weight • EW, epicuticular wax • EWL, epicuticular wax load • FW, initial fresh weight • RWC, relative water content • TW, turgid weight


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
SORGHUM [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] is considered one of the most drought tolerant and water efficient crop species. It uses C4 type photosynthetic apparatus, which is widely accepted as an important mechanism in making sorghum more physiologically efficient under high temperature and low moisture conditions. However, there exist other distinctive morphological and physiological features that have been proposed to contribute to the overall drought tolerance of sorghum. One such feature is its ability to produce and deposit high amounts of bloom or epicuticular wax (EW) in the form of readily visible wax flakes on the aerial parts of the plants (Ebercon et al., 1977; Jenks et al., 1992). Epicuticular wax deposition is visually obvious on the abaxial side of the leaf blade and sheath and on the peduncle, most prominently at the preflowering to maturity stage of sorghum (Jordan et al., 1983; Jenks et al., 1994; Jenks et al., 2000). A high level of EW deposition is a dominant trait, and all sorghum hybrids grown in the United States exhibit the feature with some variation (Jordan et al., 1983). Bloom was reported to possibly be under the control of two genes, with bloomless (bm) and sparse bloom (h) recognized as genetically distinct (Ayyangar and Ponnaiya, 1941). A comparison of the phenotypes and a more detailed crossing study revealed that more genes could be involved depending on the crossing scheme and the mutants used in the study (Peterson et al., 1982).

Evidence for the role and contribution of EW to tolerance to abiotic stress had been alluded to earlier in several studies that focused on the significance of EW to drought tolerance. Blum (1975) proposed that thicker EW in sorghum could lead to reduced cuticular transpiration and possibly enhance stomatal control of water loss. In a field study, genetic variation and differences in combining abilities for EW production were observed in 14 normal bloom sorghum lines (Jordan et al., 1983). Furthermore, EW load was found to increase with drought stress (Jordan et al., 1983). In a related study, a comparison of 38 near isogenic lines (19 normal bloom, 14 bloomless, and 5 sparse bloom) of sorghum showed that a decrease in EW load from 0.1 to 0.03 g m–2 resulted in an increase in cuticular transpiration using detached leaves and a mass water transpiration method measured with a modified cuvette apparatus (Jordan et al., 1984). They estimated that an EW load of about 0.067 g m–2 could provide an effective barrier to water loss through the cuticle (Jordan et al., 1984). Furthermore, in a comparative study of three bloomless and one sparse bloom mutant lines with their corresponding isogenic siblings under greenhouse conditions, Premachandra et al. (1994) reported that water use efficiency was positively correlated with epicuticular wax load under both irrigated and nonirrigated conditions. Jenks et al. (1994) showed that bloomless mutation increased cuticular transpiration with pleiotropic effects and increased the susceptibility to the fungal pathogen Exserohilum turcicum. Results from these studies suggest that sorghum EW could play an important role in possibly reducing cuticular transpiration and could have other pleiotropic effects. However, in these studies, determination of cuticular transpiration was based on a detached leaf method (except for the study by Jenks et al., 1994), and artificial methods in inducing stomatal closure were used. The effect of a bloomless mutation on nighttime transpiration, when stomata are generally thought to close under normal conditions, has never been examined.

The main objective of this research was to characterize the physiological and genetic features of an irradiated bloomless mutant of sorghum (EW mutant) and analyze the physiological effects of this mutation using a defined F2 population under controlled greenhouse conditions. This study also determined the relationship between cuticular wax and nighttime leaf transpiration of sorghum in a pedigreed population.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plant Materials and Genetic Analysis
To study the genetics and physiology of the bloom–bloomless trait in sorghum, an F2 population was developed by crossing (via hand emasculation) the mutant line KFS2021 to BTx623. KFS2021 was developed by gamma irradiation of the cultivar Tx7078 by the late Dr. Keith F. Schertz. Tx7078 is an established restorer line characterized by early maturity, preflowering drought tolerance, and good combining ability. BTx623 is a widely adapted maintainer line that has been used extensively in sorghum genetics study. F1 seeds were harvested, planted one plant per pot, grown in 8-liter pots filled with commercial soil mix (SunGro Professional Mix #1, Bellevue, WA), in the greenhouse in Lubbock, Texas, under a temperature regime of 28°C day and 25°C night, with a relative humidity of 44 to 48%. Plants were maintained under well-watered conditions with automatic drip irrigation and fertilized with Osmocote (Scotts Co., Marysville, OH) slow-release formulation. The F1 plants were found to exhibit the bloom phenotype, indicating that bloom is a dominant phenotypic trait. The F2 seeds from a single confirmed F1 plant were harvested, planted in 100 pots (with 2 seeds per pot), and grown in the same greenhouse under the conditions described above. Bloom–bloomless phenotypes were scored at 22 d after planting, at which time one random seedling per pot was removed and used for the seedling water loss study. The remaining 100 F2 individuals were grown to maturity and used for detailed characterization of physiological features related to epicuticular wax load and self-pollinated to produce the F2:3 generation. Twenty random seeds from each of the F2:3 families were planted in 2-liter pots in the greenhouse to further examine the bloom–bloomless phenotypic and genotypic scores in the F2 generation.

Determination of Seedling Water Loss
Seedling water loss rates were determined from the 100 F2 thinned seedlings described above and five plants from each parental line. Before harvest, the plants were scored visually for presence or absence of epicuticular wax. Seedlings were cut at the base of the shoot, wrapped in moist filter paper, placed in labeled plastic bags, and transported to the laboratory. The cut surface was covered with transparent tape to prevent water loss through the base of the stem. At the beginning of the experiment, initial fresh weight (FW-i) of each seedling was determined to within 0.1 mg (Mettler Toledo model AB104-S, Mettler Toledo Inc., Columbus, OH). Seedlings were hung from the attached tape on paper clips in an open area in the laboratory in consecutive harvest order and allowed to transpire freely. Fresh weights were measured at hourly intervals for 8 h. Water loss rate was expressed as the rate of change in fresh weight relative to original FW-i.

Guttation Frequency and Relative Water Content
Guttation was determined from the remaining 100 F2 greenhouse-grown plants at mid-vegetative stage. Guttation was scored as present or absent based on dew formation on the margins of two to three fully expanded leaves. Observations for guttation were made every other day during the morning hours of 0700 to 0900. The frequency of guttation was calculated on the basis of observations over 5 d, and frequency of guttation for the parental lines and the 100 F2 progenies were calculated.

Relative water content (RWC) was measured based on previously described methods (Barrs and Weatherly, 1962). Five leaf discs (0.8 cm in diameter) were obtained from parents and from 24 F2 individuals (12 each of bloom and bloomless F2 plants). Leaf discs were weighed immediately and then immersed in 5 mL of distilled deionized H2O for 8 h at room temperature; subsequently, turgid weight (TW) was determined and leaf discs were dried at 65°C for 24 h to determine final dry weights (DW). Relative water content was calculated as: RWC = [(FW – DW])/[TW – DW)] x 100. Relative water contents were also determined from the parents and the same 24 F2 plants at anthesis before measurement of conductance.

Epicuticular Wax Load Determination
Gravimetric determination of wax load in leaves was conducted using 20 leaf discs (0.8 cm diam.) from each of the 5 parental plants and from the 100 F2 individuals. Leaf discs were collected from the third leaf (minus flag leaf) at anthesis. The samples were transported to the laboratory in closed plastic boxes, and epicuticular wax was extracted from leaves according to previously described methods (Ebercon et al., 1977). Epicuticular wax was extracted from both abaxial and adaxial sides of leaves using 5 mL of gas-chromatography grade chloroform by swirling the discs in the solvent for 30 s. Measurement of gravimetric amount of wax was performed using a balance with sensitivity of 0.1 mg (Mettler Toledo model AB104-S, Mettler Toledo Inc., Columbus, OH). Spectrophotometric or chemical assay of leaf wax was also performed by dissolving wax in 0.5 mL of 0.016M potassium dichromate in 96% sulfuric acid as wax reagent, transferred to 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and heated at 90°C for 30 min in a dry bath under the hood as described by Ebercon et al. (1977). Absorbance was measured at 590 nm using Beckman UV-VIS DU-640 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Calculation of wax load was based on a standard using a standard curve of a known amount of sorghum wax from 0.5 to 12 mg. Wax load from sheaths was determined using the same protocols as described for leaf blades except that only 10 discs were used for sheath assay.

Gravimetric and chemical assay of leaf wax was found to be 95% correlated with each other. Results from the gravimetric assay are presented in this report.

Determination of Epidermal Permeability
Cuticle epidermal permeability based on chlorophyll leaching was analyzed using previously described protocols (Lolle et al., 1997). Briefly, 10 leaf discs from the fourth leaf (minus flag leaf) were collected at 70 d after planting both parents and 100 F2 individuals. Leaf discs were immersed in 10 mL of 80% ethanol, and chlorophyll was allowed to leach into the solvent. The samples were placed in the dark, and absorbance at 645 and 667 nm were measured at hourly intervals for 6 h after collection. Total chlorophyll leached at 24 h after immersion was determined, and leaching was expressed as a percentage of the total chlorophyll at 24 h.

Conductance Measurement
Preliminary measurements of nighttime conductance were performed to determine whether variation existed among three different leaf positions (second, third, and fifth leaf) in 10 plant samples (representing five each of bloom and bloomless phenotypes) between different portions of the leaves using a portable leaf poromoter (Decagon Inc., Pullman, WA). Results showed that nighttime conductance was not affected by leaf position and that measurement in different portions of the leaves showed similar values. Preliminary measurements were also conducted to compare conductance values of the adaxial and abaxial sides of the leaves at night for the parental lines and 10 representative F2 individuals (5 plants each of bloom and bloomless phenotype). Our results showed that conductance values for the adaxial side of the leaves were very low and probably beyond the detection of the instrument used in the study. However, conductance values from the abaxial side of the leaves were high and within the range of values reported for sorghum (Jordan et al., 1983, 1984; Muchow and Sinclair, 1989; Premachandra et al., 1994; Jenks et al., 1994). From these results, we decided to focus on measurement of conductance from the abaxial side of the leaf.

Daytime stomatal conductance was measured on the third leaf below the flag leaf between 1100 and 1500 hours on three different days. Nighttime conductance was measured on the same leaf at night between 2000 and 2400 hours on three different nights in the same week. Leaves were carefully handled so as not to reduce EW in the leaves and sheaths throughout the study. On each set of readings (whether day or night), the two parents and all 100 F2 individuals were measured, and each sampling date was considered as a replication.

Water Use Efficiency
Characterization of water use efficiency was performed using a modified lysimetry method. Seeds from the parents were planted in plastic pots with a 15.2-cm diameter and 17.8-cm depth holding approximately 2 L of potting mix. The pots were filled with a measured amount of commercial soil mix as described in the plant materials section and watered with 0.5X Miracle-Gro (Scotts-Miracle Gro Co., Marysville, OH) until dripping from the bottom. Three seeds were planted per pot. After planting, the pots were covered with a layer of dry potting mix to reduce water loss from the soil surface. One week after emergence, each pot was thinned to one plant, and the pot was covered from both ends with 2 Mil poly bags (S-3478, Uline, Waukegan, IL), which are permeable to air but impermeable to water. A hole was cut in the top of the bag to allow the plant to protrude. The hole was further sealed with strong packing tape and covered with a layer of dry potting mix to prevent water loss through the opening in the top of the bag. Pots with soil and a small seedling were weighed as initial weight. When plants reached permanent wilt, the shoots were harvested and the final pot weight (including root) was weighed. Water used was calculated by subtracting the final pot weight from the initial weight. Transpiration efficiency was calculated by dividing the total dry matter with the water used.

Statistical Analysis
A Chi-square analysis for goodness of fit of the F2 and F2:3 phenotypic distributions to a 3:1 and 1:2:1 genetic ratio, respectively, was conducted. Since this study involved an F2 population with only two phenotypes being compared, unpaired t tests between the two classes for the traits measured were conducted. The t tests were performed with due consideration of unequal variance and computed t values for testing significance were calculated according to formula by Cochran and Cox (1957). All statistical analyses were conducted using SYSTAT 7.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Physiological Characterization of Parents
The difference in EW deposition on the abaxial side of the leaves and sheaths between the two parents used in this study is shown in Fig. 1 . The irradiated mutant KFS2021 was similar to BTx623 for a number of traits, but most striking is that the mutant plants had no visible white fluffy wax structures in their aerial parts. In Fig. 1, visual differences between mature plants of parents are readily apparent, but the differences in EW between these two contrasting phenotypes could be observed as early as the second true leaf stage (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Photographs of (A) BTx623 with profuse bloom or epicuticular wax and (B) bloomless mutant KFS2021 used in the study. The photographs show the abaxial side of fifth leaf and sheath of the fifth internode at anthesis.

 
At anthesis, leaves of KFS2021 exhibited 75% reduction in EW load compared with BTx623 as measured by gravimetric method (Table 1 ). The difference was more pronounced in the sheaths, where EW load of the mutant bloomless parent showed a 93% reduction compared with the bloom parent (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Determination of phenotypic and physiological features of parents and the F2 phenotypic classes in the population of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] developed from the cross between BTx623 and mutant line KFS2021. Values are means for parents and phenotypic classes of the F2 generation, while those inside the parentheses represent standard error (SE).

 
At the two-leaf stage and based on whole plant measurements, mutant KFS2021 showed a significant increase in cumulative water loss (Table 1). At the vegetative stage, the mutant line had significantly lower guttation frequency and water use efficiency (Table 1). However, the mutant exhibited significantly increased epidermal permeability as indicated by the chlorophyll leaching assay. Most relevant, based on intact leaf measurement of nighttime conductance, bloomless mutant KFS2021 exhibited 3.6-fold higher conductance values relative to BTx623 (Table 1).

Genetic Analysis of Mutation
The segregation data for the 100 F2 individuals used in the study is presented in Table 2 . The data fits a 3:1 ratio, indicating that the bloomless mutation in this study is under the control of a single recessive nuclear gene. Further analysis of segregation in the F2:3 families confirmed the segregation pattern found in the F2 generation, which indicated that a single nuclear recessive gene could account for the bloomless mutation in KFS2021 (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Genetic analysis of inheritance of bloomless phenotype based on segregation ratio for the trait in F2 and F2:3 generations and Chi-square test comparing the observed and expected ratio for each generation.

 
The frequency distributions (histograms) of the 100 F2 individuals for leaf and sheath wax loads are presented in Fig. 2A and 2B, respectively. A distinct bimodal distribution of the F2 progenies based on their leaf and sheath wax loads was clearly shown in the histogram. Bloomless F2 exhibit a minute amount of wax load compared to bloom individuals (Table 1).


Figure 2
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Histograms of (A) leaf and (B) sheath wax loads of the F2 population. The F2 individuals with bloom are shown in solid black bars and F2 bloomless individuals are represented by hatched bars. Values for parents BTx623 and KFS2021 are indicated by arrows.

 
Genetic and Physiological Characterization of F2 Generation
The histogram for seedling water loss at 6 h after air drying is presented in Fig. 3A . The distribution showed that most of the bloomless F2 plants grouped together in the right side of the histogram and had a higher percentage of water loss than bloom progenies along with KFS2021 (Table 1). A closer look at the pattern of water loss between the two phenotypic classes shown in Fig. 3B demonstrated that bloomless progenies had significantly higher water loss at 3 h after air drying compared to bloom individuals. Determination of water loss rate per F2 phenotypic class based on the linear regression line for each of the phenotypic class showed that the water loss rate of bloomless F2 plants (3.54 mg h–1) was 60% higher than that of bloom progenies (2.22 mg h–1) (Fig. 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Histograms of (A) seedling water loss rate at 6 h after drying and (B) mean percentage of seedling water loss over an 8-h period for the two phenotypic classes in the F2 population. The F2 individuals with bloom are shown in solid black bars, and F2 bloomless individuals are represented by hatched bars. For Fig. 3B, regression analysis was used to estimate best fit line (with r2 = 0.99) and the rate of water loss for each of the phenotypic class. Best fit equation for the bloomless class is: % water loss = (3.54) (x) + 10.15, and for the bloom class is: % water loss = (2.22) (x) + 9.1, where x = time of harvest.

 
The frequency distribution of F2 individuals based on their chlorophyll leaching and guttation are shown in Fig. 4A and 4B, respectively; the mean values for each phenotypic class are shown in Table 1. The histogram shows that most of the bloomless F2 individuals grouped together in the right side of the distribution and exhibited higher chlorophyll leaching than the bloom F2 individuals (Fig. 4A). The distribution based on the guttation traits showed almost discrete bimodal distribution with all bloomless F2 plants showing absence of guttation and 90% of bloom F2 plants exhibiting guttation (Fig. 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Histograms of (A) epidermal permeability expressed as % chlorophyll leaching at 6 h and (B) % guttation in the F2 population. The F2 individuals with bloom are shown in solid black bars and F2 bloomless individuals are represented by hatched bars. Values for parents BTx623 and KFS2021 are indicated by arrows.

 
The distributions of the phenotypic classes based on night and daytime conductances are plotted in Fig. 5A and 5B, respectively; the mean values for each phenotypic class are shown in Table 1. The bloom and bloomless F2 individuals fell into two distinctive classes, with the bloomless progenies showing higher conductance based on both daytime and nighttime values. Values of nighttime conductance for bloomless F2 plants was three- to sixfold higher than F2 plants with bloom (Fig. 5A). Results also showed that daytime conductance was three- to fivefold higher than nighttime conductance, possibly due to the effect of stomatal conductance. However, the mean absolute differences between the bloom and bloomless progenies in daytime conductance (6.27 mmol m–2 s–1) and nighttime conductance (5.99 mmol m–2 s–1) were similar, indicating that EW mainly affects nonstomatal or cuticular conductance.


Figure 5
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Histograms of (A) nighttime and (B) daytime conductances of the F2 population. The F2 individuals with bloom are shown in solid black bars, and F2 bloomless individuals are represented by hatched bars. Values for parents, BTx623 and KFS2021 are indicated by arrows.

 
Genetic Correlation of Epicuticular Wax–Related Traits
Relationships among several traits in the F2 generation were analyzed using a genetic correlation test. Leaf EW load was positively correlated with guttation frequency, indicating a commensurate increase in guttation frequency with increased leaf EW levels (Table 3 ). However, leaf EW was negatively correlated with both percentage of chlorophyll leaching and nighttime conductance (correlation coefficient –0.54 and –0.52, respectively). Thus, with increased leaf EW, significant and consistent reductions in both epidermal permeability and nighttime conductance were observed. Significant negative correlation was also observed among guttation frequency, percentage of chlorophyll leaching, and nighttime conductance. Epidermal permeability was positively correlated with both day and nighttime conductances, which were also positively correlated with each other (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Correlation (r2) of leaf epicuticular wax load (EWL) and three physiological traits determined from the F2 generation grown to maturity.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The deposition of large flakes of wax, also known as bloom, on cuticular surfaces is present in all sorghum lines, cultivars, and hybrids under commercial cultivation within the United States. Comparative analysis based on published literature as well as this study indicates that sorghum as a species produces probably one of the highest amounts of leaf EW among cereal crops. Results from this study indicate that sorghum, on a per unit leaf area basis, produces an average of 1.9 mg dm–1 while the published value for rice (Oryza sativa L.) was 0.05 mg dm–1 (O'Toole and Cruz, 1983). On per unit weight basis, sorghum produces approximately 52.7 mg g–1 wax, while the published value for maize (Zea maize) was 17.0 mg g–1 (Beattie and Marcell, 2002) and durum wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has a range of 25 to 35.7 mg g–1 depending on the location (Araus et al., 1991). It has long been recognized that the cuticle itself and EW are both very important in protecting plants from desiccation (Shepherd and Griffiths, 2006). Specifically, in sorghum the presence of a high amount of EW was proposed to serve as a potentially important drought avoidance mechanism (Jordan et al., 1983; 1984). However, a limited number of studies have been conducted to support this hypothesis, and the specific functions of EW are still not known.

In this study, a combination of genetic and physiological approaches were used to analyze how leaf and, to some extent, sheath EW are related to specific physiological traits of sorghum. We used an F2 generation from a cross between an irradiated bloomless mutant KFS2021 and a wild-type cultivated parent line BTx623. KFS2021 exhibited almost no visible wax in its aerial parts, and this study verified that this mutant line had a very small amount of detectable epicuticular wax when subjected to both gravimetric and spectrophotometric analysis compared with BTx623. At present this mutant and its F2:3 progenies are being studied in detail at the biochemical and molecular levels. Genetic analysis using the F2 generation provides information comparable to that found using near-isogenic lines of chemically induced bloomless mutants of sorghum (Jenks et al., 1994). The segregation data from this study show that the bloomless mutation in KFS2021 is controlled by a single nuclear recessive gene. Further genetic studies using genetic mapping and molecular biology technologies will facilitate the identification of the actual gene involved in this mutation. Genetic mapping studies and molecular analyses of the wax pathway using the population described here are underway.

Most of the physiological traits analyzed in this study, including seedling water loss, chlorophyll leaching, guttation, and day and night leaf conductances are generally considered as complex traits and are likely controlled by multiple genes. This hypothesis is supported by the histogram shown for each of the traits. However, an overall trend for modification toward a bimodal distribution in the F2 population, in contrast to a continuous distribution based on phenotypic classes, suggests that EW could have significant effect on each of these complex traits determined. The relationships between EW and the physiological traits are further supported by correlation analysis.

Genetic correlation analyses from the F2 generation for leaf EW and related traits indicated strong associations among traits. A reduction in EW was found to be associated with high seedling water loss, in agreement with previous reports in sorghum (Chatterton et al., 1975; Jenks et al., 1994; Premachandra et al., 1994). More interestingly, EW was found to be positively associated with guttation and negatively correlated with epidermal permeability. Characterization of these two physiological traits has never been reported in sorghum before, and these data provide further support for the involvement of EW in reducing night transpiration of sorghum. Leaf EW of sorghum could serve as a barrier for leaching of molecules out of the leaves, as exemplified by the relatively higher levels of chlorophyll leaching associated with reduction in EW. The observed association between guttation and EW was interesting. It was consistently found that only bloomless F2 individuals showed decreased frequency of guttation, which is related to the role of EW in controlling cuticular transpiration. This decrease in guttation in bloomless plants is proposed to be a result of higher nighttime transpiration, which prevents these plants from building positive hydrostatic or root pressure and thus precluding the occurrence of guttation. Nobel (1991) previously described this relationship between transpiration and guttation. Consequently, as was observed in this study, F2 plants with bloom or high EW had lower nighttime transpiration, had a higher chance of developing positive root pressure in the evening, and thus exhibited increased guttation frequencies.

Nighttime conductance measurements can be thought of as an estimate of cuticular transpiration since the effects of stomatal conductance were presumably negligible. It is generally assumed that at night plants close their stomata and only lose water via the cuticle (Nobel, 1991). Plants in this study were grown in the greenhouse, where humidity, airflow, and temperature were controlled, thus allowing for a good estimate of cuticular transpiration. The analysis of 100 F2 individuals for conductance was greatly facilitated by the use of a handheld porometer. The values for nighttime conductance were highly consistent for each individual progeny and also across the different days of measurement. (In this study, RWC of the leaves was also measured to rule out the effects of possible differences in leaf hydration on conductances.) These data from the F2 population indicate that EW plays an important role in regulating nighttime cuticular transpiration in sorghum. The epicuticular wax load is probably one important factor that could contribute to the greater water efficiency and drought tolerance of sorghum. This study suggests that the high levels of EW in sorghum and its possible role in reducing cuticular transpiration may play a very important role in sorghum's drought avoidance and tolerance characteristics in the greenhouse. Further field study using an advanced generation of the population developed in this study will provide additional evidence to the importance of EW in drought response of sorghum.

The extent to which EW can affect nighttime transpiration has not been explored fully. Information on nighttime transpiration is limited, and study of this physiological activity is generally in its infancy (Snyder et al., 2003; Caird et al., 2007; Howard and Donovan, 2007). Based on the results from this study, significant EW reduction or possible elimination could result in significant increase in nighttime transpiration, which could be equivalent to 30% of daytime water loss. When compounded over the course of the growing season, this represents a significant amount of water loss that has never received ample attention. Given the present condition of dwindling water supplies, increased attention to the levels of EW in a system such as sorghum could provide a good entry point toward manipulation of nighttime water loss in agricultural systems. The implications of these results could also be important for development of crop varieties that can perform well under sustainable agricultural systems.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert Klein, SPARC, USDA-ARS, College Station, TX, for generously providing the mutant seeds used in the study. The authors also acknowledge Halee Hughes, Lindsey Fox, Charles Woodfin, Naomi Kaskela, and Lance Layton for excellent technical assistance.

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication March 2, 2007.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. J. Peters, M. A. Jenks, P. J. Rich, J. D. Axtell, and G. Ejeta
Mutagenesis, Selection, and Allelic Analysis of Epicuticular Wax Mutants in Sorghum
Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1250 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burow, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Xin, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burow, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Xin, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burow, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Xin, Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Crop Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome