Published online 7 November 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:2504-2512 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
TURFGRASS SCIENCE
Nutrient Uptake Responses and Inorganic Ion Contribution to Solute Potential under Salinity Stress in Halophytic Seashore Paspalums
Geung-Joo Leea,b,
Ronny R. Duncana,c and
Robert N. Carrowa,*
a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223
b present address: Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Jeong-Eup 580-185, Korea
c present address: Turf Ecosystems, LLC, 110 Arroyo, Boerne, TX 78006
* Corresponding author (rcarrow{at}uga.edu).
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
There is increasing interest in superior halophytes for use on saline turfgrass, forage, and land reclamations sites. We investigated halophytic seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz) ecotype responses for inorganic ion uptake in shoot tissues and to identify total and individual inorganic ion contributions to total solute potential (
s) adjustment under increasing salinity. In a greenhouse study, nine ecotypes varying substantially in salinity tolerance were grown in nutrient/sand culture with six salinity levels up to 49.7 dS m–1. Increasing salinity reduced uptake of K, Ca, and Mg, with Mg most affected. Sodium tissue content increased with salinity, but Cl increased and then declined as salinity increased. The least salt- tolerant ecotype, Adalayd, exhibited lower Cl uptake at high salinity compared to the most salt-tolerant types (SI 93-2, HI 101). Shoot and root growth were positively correlated to K tissue content and K was the primary ion for solute potential (
s) adjustment. Inorganic ions contributed 57 to 97% to
s adjustment with salt-tolerant ecotypes exhibiting less dependence on inorganic ions for
s adjustment apparently due to their ability to maintain synthesis of organic osmolytes under high salinity. In terms of physiological traits adapted for salt-screening protocols the following were not useful: tissue nutrient/element content; K/Na and Ca/Na tissue content ratios; and K or other ion contributions to total
s in percent or MPa units. Shoot tissue content relationships of K, Mg, and Ca to increasing salinity indicate the importance of nutritional programs for these nutrients on salt-affected sites.
Nutrient Uptake Responses and Inorganic Ion Contribution to Solute Potential under Salinity Stress in Halophytic Seashore Paspalums
Geung-Joo Leea,b,
Ronny R. Duncana,c and
Robert N. Carrowa,*
a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223
b present address: Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Jeong-Eup 580-185, Korea
c present address: Turf Ecosystems, LLC, 110 Arroyo, Boerne, TX 78006
* Corresponding author (rcarrow{at}uga.edu).
There is increasing interest in superior halophytes for use on saline turfgrass, forage, and land reclamations sites. We investigated halophytic seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz) ecotype responses for inorganic ion uptake in shoot tissues and to identify total and individual inorganic ion contributions to total solute potential (
s) adjustment under increasing salinity. In a greenhouse study, nine ecotypes varying substantially in salinity tolerance were grown in nutrient/sand culture with six salinity levels up to 49.7 dS m–1. Increasing salinity reduced uptake of K, Ca, and Mg, with Mg most affected. Sodium tissue content increased with salinity, but Cl increased and then declined as salinity increased. The least salt- tolerant ecotype, Adalayd, exhibited lower Cl uptake at high salinity compared to the most salt-tolerant types (SI 93-2, HI 101). Shoot and root growth were positively correlated to K tissue content and K was the primary ion for solute potential (
s) adjustment. Inorganic ions contributed 57 to 97% to
s adjustment with salt-tolerant ecotypes exhibiting less dependence on inorganic ions for
s adjustment apparently due to their ability to maintain synthesis of organic osmolytes under high salinity. In terms of physiological traits adapted for salt-screening protocols the following were not useful: tissue nutrient/element content; K/Na and Ca/Na tissue content ratios; and K or other ion contributions to total
s in percent or MPa units. Shoot tissue content relationships of K, Mg, and Ca to increasing salinity indicate the importance of nutritional programs for these nutrients on salt-affected sites.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
SALINITY STRESSES are major factors limiting plant growth and productivity in many areas of the world and include imposition of ion toxicities (e.g., Na and Cl), ionic imbalances, osmotic stress, and soil permeability problems (Epstein et al., 1980; Flowers, 1999). Salinity tolerance differs among crop species with growth of most crops adversely affected when electrical conductivity of soil (saturated paste extract, ECe) is 1 to 3 dS m–1, while moderately salt-tolerant crops may continue to grow up to 8 dS m–1 (Maas, 1987). Only halophytes, however, can survive at higher salinity
30 dS m–1 (Flowers et al., 1977; Flowers and Yeo, 1986; Maas, 1987).
Seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz), a halophytic warm season grass, has recently gained interest for use on saline turfgrass and forage sites, drainage water reuse schemes, and land reclamation under saline conditions (Duncan and Carrow, 2000; Semple et al., 2003; Grattan et al., 2004; Rogers et al., 2005). Seashore paspalum exhibits a wide range in salinity tolerance among ecotypes (Lee et al., 2004b, 2005). For several halophytic grasses, Hester et al. (2001) reported a wide intraspecific variation in salinity tolerance that was as great as the interspecific variation observed.
Genotypes within a species that exhibit superior salinity tolerance must possess different mechanisms or degree of expression of mechanisms compared to the least tolerant types. Knowledge of these mechanisms can assist in developing physiological-based screening protocols in traditional breeding programs and focus biotechnological approaches toward enhancement of specific biochemical traits contributing to superior salt tolerance within the species (Bohnert and Jensen, 1996; Duncan and Carrow, 1999; Hester et al., 2001; Ashraf and Harris, 2004).
When salt-tolerant plants are exposed to a more negative water potential (
w) in saline soil conditions, they are able to maintain water uptake, growth, and persistence through solute potential (
s) adjustment primarily accomplished by uptake of inorganic ions and/or synthesis of organic osmolytes (Bohnert and Shen, 1999). Halophytes that are ion includers often adapt to low water potentials by accumulation of inorganic solutes to maintain turgor pressure and total water potential (Glenn, 1987; Flowers et al., 1990; Glenn et al., 1992). To avoid toxicity of Na, Cl, and other inorganic ions within the cytosol and cell walls, these ions are compartmentalized mainly into the vacuoles of shoot and root cells (Flowers et al., 1977; Lerner et al., 1994). Compatible osmolytes (ones that do not disturb intracellular biochemistry), such as organic solutes and K to some extent, must also be present in the cytosol for osmotic adjustment and osmoprotection (Sairam et al., 2006). Generally, salinity tolerance is related to maintaining higher contents of K and Ca, because these ions are involved in turgor control and cell wall integrity, respectively, under saline conditions (Cramer et al., 1985; Flowers and Yeo, 1986; Wolf et al., 1991).
Genotypic differences in ion accumulation have been noted among four seashore paspalum ecotypes, where the most salt-tolerant type (FSP-1) exhibited the lowest shoot tissue concentrations of Na and Cl as salinity (sea salt) increased above 30 dS m–1 (Dudeck and Peacock, 1985). Increasing salinity reduced plant tissue K content in all ecotypes. In a study with FSP-1 and another more salt-tolerant type, FSP-3, increasing salinity caused Na to increase in both grasses, but to a lesser extent in FSP-3, while Cl tissue content did not change with salinity and K content decreased (Dudeck and Peacock, 1993). Contributions of inorganic ions to osmotic adjustment were not reported in these studies, but osmotic adjustment through inorganic ion uptake and/or synthesis of organic compounds has been postulated to have a significant role in salt tolerance in seashore paspalum by Marcum and Murdoch (1994).
In addition to inorganic ion contributions to osmotic adjustment, genotypic differences in nutrient and element uptake under salinity have implications for maintaining adequate nutrition and for optimizing nutrient/element related salinity tolerance mechanisms. Uptake of essential cations and anions including K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, NH4+, and NO3– have been reported to be suppressed in various species by high concentrations of Na+ and Cl–, such as occurs in saline soils and irrigation waters (Grieve and Fujiyama, 1987; Awad et al., 1990; Rubinigg et al., 2003). Increasing salinity resulted in reduced Ca and Mg tissue contents within all four seashore paspalum ecotypes studied by Dudeck and Peacock (1985). In a study using two paspalum ecotypes, increasing salinity did not alter Ca, Cl, or Mn shoot tissue content, while Mg decreased with increasing salinity for the most salt-tolerant type (Dudeck and Peacock (1993). For both types, increasing salinity resulted in reduced levels of K, P, and Zn, while Na increased. The studies involving seashore paspalum have included a limited number of ecotypes and with a relatively narrow range of salinity tolerance.
Lee et al. (2004b, 2005) reported the salinity tolerance of nine seashore paspalum ecotypes; and salinity effects on total water potential, solute potential, and turgor pressure. Within the current paper, these nine ecotypes differing substantially in salinity tolerance were used to investigate under increasing salinity up to ECw 50 dS m–1: (i) differential ecotype nutrient and element uptake in the shoot tissues and their implications; and (ii) differential ecotype response for total inorganic and specific inorganic ion contributions to solute potential,
s, at the highest salinity level; and the implications of these responses.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Nine seashore paspalum ecotypes were selected for this study based on salinity tolerance, which included the most (SI 93-2, HI 101), intermediate (Sea Isle 2000, TCR 1, TCR 6, Sea Isle 1, HI 34, SI 90), and least tolerant (Adalayd) (Lee et al., 2005). The Sea Isle cultivars were released in 1999 from the University of Georgia program of Dr. Ron Duncan (Georgiaturf, 2007) while Adalayd is an older cultivar introduced from Australia in 1975 (Duncan and Carrow, 2000). In this paper, all grasses are referred to as ecotypes since they are all selections from various harsh environments except Adalayd. This study was conducted using a solution/sand culture under controlled greenhouse conditions at the Griffin Campus in Griffin, GA from May to November 1998. On cloudy days and to extend the daylength, supplemental light with 400W metal halide lights were used to maintain light intensity in the range of 500 to 900 µmol m–2 s–1. Temperature in the greenhouse was 30 ± 2/27 ± 2°C (day/night) with a 14 h photoperiod. Plugs of each grass were grown using a greenhouse mix in 2 cm square by 3 cm containers in the greenhouse before plugging into larger containers of 13.0 cm long by 10.0 cm wide by 12.5 cm high. Soil was washed from the plugs before transplanting. Five 2-cm plugs of an ecotype were planted into a larger container with six replications of each grass and salinity level combination. Ecotypes were maintained under cutting practices of 2.5 cm (once a week) throughout the study. Each large container with nine holes at the bottom was filled with washed sand. The culture solution was prepared using a half-strength of Hoagland and Arnon's (1950) nutrient solution (#2), modified with Fe-EDTA as an iron source to give 5mg L–1 of Fe (Sprint 138, 6% Fe, Becker-Underwood, Ames, IA). Nine containers, each with an ecotype, were held in a wooden frame and placed in a 28-L container of nutrient solution (1.2 dS m–1 and pH = 6.3 ± 0.5) formulated with deionized water.
After a 4-wk acclimation period, the nutrient solution was salinized with a sea salt mixture to give salinity levels of 10.3, 20.5, 30.7, 39.5, and 49.7 dS m–1 (designated as ECw0, ECw10, ECw20, ECw30, ECw40, and ECw50, respectively). To minimize salt shock, ECw (electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution) levels were gradually increased by adding 6.9 g kg–1 sea salt everyday until the final target salinity was achieved (Dudeck and Peacock, 1985). The nutrient solution was replaced weekly, aerated continuously, and refilled to constant volume using deionized water at approximately every 2 d. Electrical conductivity of the nonsaline solution was 1.2 dS m–1 and pH was 6.3 ± 0.5 during the experiment. Salinity levels were monitored by measuring the ECw twice a week at 25°C with an Orion 160 conductivity meter (Orion, Boston, MA).
Shoot clippings were collected weekly and combined into 2-wk intervals to provide four clipping periods during the experiment. The excised clippings were immediately oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h and the samples from the last collection period at the end of the study were ground for tissue analyses. For mineral analyses of K, Na, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, B, Cu, and Zn, the microwave-assisted acid digestion method was used (Binstock et al., 1991). The homogenized ground samples (0.25 g) were extracted by heating with 10 mL concentrated nitric acid. Extractable chloride with 100 mg ground tissue was assayed using a chlorimetric autoanalyzer method according to Zali et al. (1956).
The contribution of inorganic ions to solute potential was determined using the van't Hoff equation as reported by Alarcon et al. (1993), where the calculated contribution of individual solutes to measured solute potential,
s, was based on relative dry weight at saturation [dry weight/(saturated weight-dry weight)] and solute concentration on a dry weight basis. Solute potential of leaf tissue sap was determined as reported by Lee et al. (2005). We assumed that solutes behaved as ideal osmotica as noted by Alarcon et al. (1993). Ideally the solute contribution of the sap should be determined, but with fine-textured grasses this is very difficult. Some minor overestimation of solutes may occur from the use of solute tissue content, but we used the highest salinity level where inorganic solute concentration in the vacuoles would be very high for an ion accumulator halophyte such as seashore paspalum, which would minimize error.
The experimental design was a split-plot design with six replications where salinity level and ecotypes were the main and subplot, respectively. Six salinity levels (one salt level per container) were arranged randomly within each replication. Contents of inorganic ions were statistically analyzed using least significant difference (LSD) to separate means of grass ecotypes at each salinity level and among salinity levels for each ecotype (SAS Institute, 2001). Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the most significant inorganic ions that correlated with variation in shoot and root growth (dependent variables) across all salinity treatments. The unit used for regression was each ecotype-salinity replication. All independent variables significant at p
0.05 level were included in the forward selection model, and partial R2 and coefficient values were assessed for the relationship of variables.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Nutrient and Element Uptake in the Shoot Tissue
Seashore paspalum ecotypes are listed in the tables in declining order of salinity tolerance based on responses of shoot, root, and total growth (shoot, root, crown), where SI 93-2 and HI 101 were most tolerant, followed by six entries, and then Adalayd, which exhibited the least tolerance (Lee et al., 2005). Full data for P, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and B are not presented since the effects of salinity on shoot tissue contents were small in magnitude as were ecotype differences. As salinity increased, ecotype responses for tissue content of these nutrients were generally classified into three response types as salinity increased: decreasing (P and Cu), initially decreasing followed by increasing (Fe and B), and initially increasing followed by decreasing (Cl, Mn, and Zn) tissue ion concentrations. The range of shoot tissue contents across all salinity levels and ecotypes was 3.7 to 6.1 mg g–1 P, and for the micronutrients in mg kg–1 values were: 75.1 to 107.0 Fe; 59.2 to 176.7 Mn; 49.7 to 78.0 Zn; 17.1 to 23.3 Cu; and 14.6 to 23.1 B.
Potassium was the most abundant nutrient in shoot tissue, and ranged from 40.0 to 43.76 mg g–1 for the nine ecotypes at ECw0, and from 31.2 to 36.1 mg g–1 at ECw50 (average of 19% decrease from control) (Table 1
). Potassium uptake decreased with increasing salinity for all seashore paspalums and there were significant differences among ecotypes at salinity levels
ECw20.
Sodium uptake was enhanced with increasing salinity for all ecotypes with the greatest increase between ECw0 and ECw10 (Table 2
). Average Na content ranged from 2.0 to 11.0 mg g–1 at control and ECw50, respectively (5.5-fold increase). Differences in Na tissue content among the seashore paspalums were evident with increasing salinity, but small in magnitude and without an apparent relationship to salinity tolerance.
Average Cl content increased from the control 1.3 times to an average of 23.5 mg g–1 at ECw30 but decreased slightly at salinity levels
ECw40. As with Na, Cl concentrations exhibited the greatest increase between ECw0 (18.1) and ECw10 (22.9 mg g–1 average) for all grasses except SI 90. Differences in Cl content among the seashore paspalums were evident with salinity treatment, but only at ECw50 did the more salt-tolerant SI 93-2 (22.2) and HI 101 (21.0) exhibit higher shoot Cl contents than Adalayd (15.8 mg g–1) (Table 3
).
SI 93-2, TCR 6, and SI 90 exhibited a decrease in Ca content from ECw0 to ECw10. As salinity increased to ECw20 or ECw30, Ca content for the various ecotypes tended to increase and then decrease again (Table 4
). Average Ca content at ECw0 was 1.8 and at ECw50 it was 1.6 mg g–1. While significant differences among ecotypes were evident, they were not great in magnitude.
Shoot tissue Mg content decreased as salinity increased with the highest at ECw0 (average 3.9 mg g–1) and the lowest at ECw50 (average 2.1 mg g–1) (Table 5
). Ecotypes differences were small in magnitude.
For the grasses used in this study, the influence of increasing salinity on shoot and root growth responses as well as shoot water responses (water potential, solute potential, turgor pressure, relative water content) were reported in the paper by Lee et al. (2005). To determine the most important inorganic nutrients contributing to shoot and root growth responses of sea-shore paspalums as salinity increased, multiple regression analysis was used (Table 6
). The following equations demonstrate shoot and root growth effect from nutrient concentrations, which included all variables significant at p
0.05 level:
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 6. Regression analysis of variables of inorganic nutrients attributing to shoot and root growth under salinity stress.
|
|
Four nutrients (K, B, Mg, and Fe) in the shoot tissues accounted for 88% of the variation for shoot growth, while six nutrients (K, Fe, Mn, Zn, P, and Cl) accounted for 67% of root growth variation. Among the nutrients, K accounted for 76 and 30% of the total variation in shoot and root growth, respectively. Also, shoot growth was correlated with K and Mg uptake positively, and Fe and B uptake negatively. Root growth was related to K, Mn, P, and Cl content positively and Fe and Zn uptake negatively.
Estimated Contributions of Inorganic Osmolytes to Solute Potential (
s)
At ECw50, inorganic solutes accounted for an average of 70% (range 57–97%) of the measured total solute potential,
s; where the total would include inorganic and organic osmolytes in both the vacuole and cytosol (Table 7
). Inorganic ion contribution to measured
s was 57 and 71% for the salt-tolerant SI 93-2 and HI 101, respectively, and 82% for Adalyad. Sea Isle 1 exhibited a very strong capacity for inorganic solute contribution to total
s. In terms of solute potential, estimated inorganic solute contributions to
s averaged –1.76 MPa (range –1.41 to –2.42), while the total measured
s averaged –2.52 MPa (range –2.43 to –2.70).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 7. Estimated inorganic solute contribution to total solute potential ( s) using inorganic osmotica and their individual contribution at the highest salinity level (ECw50) by ecotype.
|
|
The major contributions to estimated inorganic osmolytes were by K (average of 29.3%), Na (17.7%), and Cl (19.9%) and these three ions accounted for 93 to 95% of the inorganic osmolytes. For SI 93-2 and HI 101, K accounted for 23.6 (i.e., –0.59/–2.50 MPa) and 30.5%, respectively, of the ion contribution to the estimated inorganic solute adjustment, while for Adalyad, K contributed 36.3%. Sodium accounted for 12.4 and 15.8% of the total osmolyte adjustment for SI 93-2 and HI 101, respectively, but for Adalayd the Na contribution was 19.7%. Chloride accounted for 17.2, 20.5, and 19.8% of total
s for SI 93-2, HI 101, and Adalayd, respectively. Since halophytic seashore paspalum is an ion includer, it is assumed that the Na and Cl were sequestered in the vacuole, while K can be within the cytosol and chloroplast as a compatible ion as well as in the vacuole contributing to osmotic adjustment.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Nutrient and Element Shoot Tissue Responses to Increasing Salinity
While tissue sufficiency ranges have not been published for seashore paspalum, the shoot tissue content of seashore paspalum ecotypes across all salinity levels were within or greater than the general sufficiency ranges for other grasses with the exception of Ca which was lower (Carrow et al., 2001). Nutrients that decreased somewhat with increasing salinity were K, Ca, Mg, P, and Cu with average shoot tissue content at ECw50 compared to ECw0 levels of 81 (34.2 mg g–1), 78 (1.6 mg g–1), 53 (2.1 mg g–1), 71 (4.1 mg g–1), and 89% (18.6 mg kg–1), respectively. Of particular note are the relatively high K tissue content and low Ca tissue content relative to other grasses with reported concentration ranges of 10.0 to 30.0 mg g–1 for K and 3.0 to 12.5 mg g–1 for Ca (Carrow et al., 2001).
The reduction in shoot tissue contents of Ca and Mg as salinity increased was probably due to the interactive substitution with Na (El-Hendawy et al., 2005). A negative correlation between Na and cations were found in this study, which were r2 = 0.71 (K), 0.26 (Ca), and 0.85 (Mg), indicating existence of Na competition with these cations, especially for K and Mg. Dudeck and Peacock (1985, 1993) also reported that increasing Na affected Mg and K more than Ca tissue content in several paspalums they studied. Calcium plays a role in membrane integrity and maintenance of ion selectivity for plants (Marschner, 1995), but no significant difference in shoot Ca content was found between the most (SI 93-2 and HI 101) and least (Adalayd) salinity tolerant ecotypes in this study.
In keeping with observations of Dudeck and Peacock (1985), Mg was generally higher than Ca in shoots of all ecotypes at all salinity levels. This result might be related to higher Mg composition (
1290 mg L–1) in sea salt mixture compared to
++411 mg L–1 for Ca, coupled with a strong competition between Mg and Ca at the cation binding sites on the root plasma membrane (Grattan and Grieve, 1999). However, the Ca/Mg ratios averaged across grasses at ECw0 and ECw50 were 0.52 and 0.74, respectively, reflecting the greater reduction in tissue Mg content as salinity increases compared to Ca. Ecotype differences in Ca/Mg were minor. Grieve et al. (2004) reported a Ca/Mg value of 0.60 for paspalum which did not change as salinity increased from 15 to 25 dS m–1 using drainage water.
With respect to shoot tissue K content only minor ecotype differences were observed with no apparent relationship to salinity tolerance (Table 1). Comparisons among the most and least tolerant ecotypes revealed some difference in shoot K/Na ratio as salinity level changed. At ECw50, SI 93-2 and HI 101 had the higher K/Na ratio (means ± standard error = 3.3 ± 0.1 and 3.3 ± 0.1, respectively) compared to Adalayd (3.1 ± 0.1). Similarly at ECw40, SI 93-2 and HI 101 had 3.7 ± 0.2 and 4.0 ± 0.2, respectively, while Adalayd had 3.4 ± 0.1. However, the K/Na ratios were all much higher than the >1 noted to be sufficient to supply necessary K for normal metabolic processes and were similar to those reported by Grieve et al. (2004) for Sea Isle 1 of 2.9 to 3.3.
Potassium tissue content, however, was the most important cation related to shoot (partial R2 = 0.76) and root growth (R2 = 0.30) in seashore paspalum ecotypes under variable salinity stress (Table 6). This is in agreement with observations for many crops when subjected to saline stress (Marschner, 1995; Grattan and Grieve, 1999). Potassium has been reported to be involved in activation of several enzymes, membrane transport, neutralization of anions, maintenance of cystolic osmotic potential (up to 100–200 mM range of K), and maintenance of osmotic potential in vacuoles and guard cells (Marschner, 1995). Thus, the correlation of K to shoot and root growth may reflect a combination of both osmotic and metabolic K activities.
Sodium and Cl uptake causes a decline in water potential in plant tissues compared to the external solution, resulting in enhancement of water uptake and turgor pressure maintenance and continuing cell growth for halophytes (Reimann and Breckle, 1993; Canny, 1995; Leidi and Saiz, 1997). A dramatic increase in Na shoot tissue content occurred from ECw0 to ECw10 for all grasses with an average of 2.0 and 7.4 mg g–1, respectively (Table 2). Sodium tissue content continued to increase with increasing salinity and averaged 11.1 mg g–1 at ECw50. While there were minor differences among ecotypes for Na tissue content at different salinity levels, no apparent relationship to salinity tolerance was observed. Dudeck and Peacock (1985, 1993) also reported an increase in Na content as salinity increased, but with lower shoot tissue levels for the more salt-tolerant types they used.
Chloride shoot tissue content also increased from ECw0 to ECw10 for all grasses except SI 90 but to a much lesser extent than Na with a Cl average of 18.3 and 22.8 mg g–1, respectively (Table 3). As salinity increased, Cl content increased to a maximum at ECw30 (average of 23.7 mg g–1) and then declined to an average of 21.2 mg g–1 at ECw50. Comparison of Cl content of SI 93-2 (22.2) and HI 101 (21.9 mg g–1) at ECw50 to the less salt-tolerant Adalayd showed that Cl tissue content of Adalayd was appreciably lower at 15.8 mg g–1. Dudeck and Peacock (1993) observed that increasing salinity resulted in a linear increase in Cl shoot tissue content except for the most salt-tolerant type where the maximum was at 32 dS m–1 and then declined.
As noted, shoot tissue concentrations between salt-tolerant vs. less tolerant ecotypes of various inorganic ions were affected by increasing salinity, but comparison of individual ion content (K, Ca, Mg, and Na) or ratios of Ca/Mg and K/Na did not appear to be related to ecotype salinity tolerance except for Cl shoot tissue concentration exhibiting a potential relationship with salinity tolerance. These characteristics, therefore, would not seem to be useful as physiological salt-screening traits. However, several nutritional related implications for K, Mg, and Ca are suggested by the data that would be of importance for managing this species in salt-affected environments.
In terms of K, the shoot tissue data would suggest that K requirement is high and care should be taken to provide ample K in salt-affected situations. The observation that K tissue content was strongly related to shoot growth and moderately related to root growth would support this statement. Paspalum would appear to have active K uptake mechanisms, since in this seawater situation with high levels of other cations (Na, Mg, and Ca), paspalum was able to take up and maintain K concentrations at an average of 81% of the control under the highest salinity and at shoot tissue concentrations above those normally found for other turfgrasses; therefore, when supplemental K is added, it should be readily taken up.
Since Mg tissue concentration was most readily suppressed by increasing salinity relative to K or Ca even when using Mg-rich seawater, it would appear that seashore paspalum does not have aggressive means for active uptake of Mg. Thus, Mg should be carefully monitored and supplemented in salt-affected sites that would contain less Mg. This may be especially a problem on salt-affected sites receiving high Ca additions, such as gypsum, which may further suppress Mg availability.
While Ca shoot tissue content was less affected by increasing salinity than Mg or K, the tendency for low inherent tissue concentrations of Ca in this species relative to other grasses indicates that reduced availability of Ca in the soil may more easily induce a Ca deficiency. Many salt-affected sites receive high levels of supplemental gypsum to alleviate sodic conditions, so adequate Ca may be available in most cases. The authors have observed on seashore paspalum irrigation with highly saline water (9–10 dS m–1) Ca deficiency symptoms and low Ca shoot tissue content (<1.7 mg g–1) when soil Ca was moderately low. Foliar applied Ca increased the shoot tissue levels to >2.0 mg g–1 and visual deficiency symptoms disappeared.
Inorganic Osmolyte Relations
Lee et al. (2005) reported in a companion paper that at ECw
30 dS m–1, salt-sensitve Adalayd exhibited a turgor pressure (
p) of 0 to –0.21 MPa, while the other grasses maintained positive
p, and that relative water content (RWC) of Adalayd was lower at ECw 50 than the salt- tolerant ecotypes. Lee et al. (2005) also noted that shoot growth responses paralleled shoot turgor potential (
p) with salt-tolerant types (SI 93-2, HI 101) maintaining more favorable
p vs. the least tolerant (Adalayd). Their results suggest that paspalum ecotypes would differ in inorganic and organic osmolyte responses for maintenance of total solute potential (
s). In the current study, total inorganic ions and individual ions did influence osmotic adjustment of seashore paspalum with several of the responses potentially related to ecotype salinity tolerance.
Osmotic adjustment of seashore paspalums was achieved more by inorganic solutes than organic osmolytes based on percentage of total contribution, with a 57 to 97% contribution from inorganic ions across the ecotypes. Halophytes, such as an ion-accumulating seashore paspalum, typically use inorganic solutes for a significant component of osmoregulation by solute potential (
s) adjustment in saline environments (Flowers et al., 1977; Glenn, 1987). Since synthesis of organic osmolytes is a high energy-requiring process, it has been suggested that ion-includer halophytes may depend on inorganic ion uptake preferentially for osmoregulation ((Rains, 1987; Glenn et al., 1992). However, in our study, the estimated contribution of the total inorganic solutes to solute potential (
s) adjustment was relatively lower in more salt-tolerant SI 93-2 (57%, –1.41 MPa) and HI 101(71%, –1.83 MPa) ecotypes than in Adalayd (82%, –2.03 MPa). This indicates that inorganic ions are the most important for maintaining total
s for paspalum as a species, but it does not appear that the most salt-tolerant ecotypes are the most aggressive inorganic ion includers nor is this trait positively related to salinity tolerance within this species. When investigating the photosynthetic responses of these ecotypes under salinity stress, Lee et al. (2004a) reported that the most salt-tolerant ecotypes were able to maintain photosynthetic capacity and, thereby, are able to produce organic compounds under high salinity for osmoregulation, osmoprotection, and growth compared to less salt-tolerant types. The high percentage reliance of Adalayd on inorganic ions for
s adjustment may be attributed to the inability to produce organic osmolytes in sufficient quantities for total
s adjustment; therefore, requiring greater inorganic uptake for osmoregulation. Growth responses of these ecotypes confirm the greater photosynthetic capacity of the more salt-tolerant types (Lee et al., 2005).
Sea Isle 1 exhibited the highest contribution of inorganic ion contribution to solute potential at 97% and it had the highest contribution for K, Na, and Cl as individual ions (Table 7). Interestingly, Sea Isle 1 demonstrated the highest numerical tissue K content at ECw 50 salinity and it was the only ecotype to exhibit a numerical (nonsignificant) increase as salinity increased from ECw 40 to ECw 50 (Table 1). These observations suggest that Sea Isle 1 may have a mechanism for enhanced K uptake under severe salinity that is less expressed in other ecotypes.
In agreement with previous reports on halophytes, K and Cl contributed the most to total
s adjustment (24–41% range for K; 15–28% range for Cl), followed by Na, Mg, and Ca (Table 7) (Flowers et al., 1977; Heslop-Harrison and Reger, 1986). The contributing effects of other nutrients were relatively minimal at 0.2 to 0.4% of the measured total
s. The contribution of K to total
s was 24 and 31% for the most salinity tolerant SI 93-2 and HI 101 ecotypes, respectively, while it was 36% for the less tolerant Adalayd. In terms of individual solute potential contribution to total
s, K accounted for –0.59 and –0.70 MPa for SI 93-2 and HI 101, respectively, while for Adalayd the contribution was –0.90 MPa (Table 7). A similar but less pronounced trend was observed for Na contribution to total
s with SI 93-2 (12%) and HI 101 (16%) to Adalyad (20%) (Table 7). This was supported by the individual solute potential contribution of Na to total
s with –0.31, –0.41, and –0.49 MPa, respectively, for SI 93-2, HI 101, and Adalyad.
Maintenance of adequate K in the cystol is essential for metabolic activity, but excess K is toxic and it must be sequestered in the vacuole (Marschner, 1995). Seashore paspalum apparently has very strong means for active uptake K and means to allocate K as a nutrient and osmoregulator, since seawater contains much higher concentrations of Na, Cl, Mg, and Ca. The more tolerant ecotypes would appear to depend less on K and Na for osmotic adjustment, but still actively take up sufficient K for cystolic metabolic requirements for enhancement of shoot or root growth (Leidi and Saiz, 1997, Wei et al., 2003).
In sum, increasing salinity resulted in reduced uptake of K, Ca, and Mg with Mg most affected. Sodium tissue content increased with salinity, while Cl increased but then declined. The least salt-tolerant ecotypes, Adalayd, exhibited lower Cl uptake at high salinity compared to the most salt-tolerant types (SI 93-2, HI 101), but trends of other nutrients and Na under increasing salinity were not related to salinity tolerance of ecotypes. Shoot and root growth were highly correlated to K tissue content. The shoot tissue content relationships of K, Mg, and Ca to increasing salinity provided insight into nutritional programs on salt-affected sites for this species. Inorganic ions contributed 57 to 97% to osmotic adjustment, indicating that seashore paspalum can readily use inorganic ions in a saline site for maintenance of more favorable plant water relations. In terms of physiological traits that may be useful in salt-screening protocols for this species, determination of K contribution to total
s in either percent or MPa units was not useful and the same conclusion could be made for the other inorganic ions. While it appears that high percent or MPa contributions of K by the least tolerance type may be a negative screen for salt sensitivity, this appears to be a secondary effect related to the inability of salt-sensitive ecotypes to produce organic photosynthates (Lee et al., 2004a). More useful physiological traits for salinity screening than inorganic ion relationships appear to be either photosynthesis characteristics or organic osmolytes responses (Lee et al., 2004a).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
Funding from the U.S. Golf Association and Georgia Turfgrass Foundation Trust is gratefully acknowledged.
 |
NOTES
|
|---|
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
Received for publication October 5, 2006.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Alarcon, J.J., M.J. Sanchez-Blanco, M.C. Bolarin, and A. Torrecillas. 1993. Water relations and osmotic adjustment in Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pennellii during short-term salt exposure and recovery. Physiol. Plant. 89:441–447.[CrossRef]
- Ashraf, M., and P.J.C. Harris. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 166:3–16.
- Awad, A.S., D.G. Edward, and L.C. Campbell. 1990. Phosphorus enhancement of salt tolerance of tomato. Crop Sci. 30:123–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Binstock, D.A., P.M. Grohse, A. Gaskill, C. Sellers, H.M. Kingston, and L.B. Jassie. 1991. Development and validation of a method for determining elements in solid waste using microwave digestion. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 74:360–366.
- Bohnert, H.J., and B. Shen. 1999. Transformation and compatible solutes. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 78:237–260.
- Bohnert, H.J., and R.G. Jensen. 1996. Metabolic engineering for increased salt tolerance—The next step. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23:661–667.[Web of Science]
- Canny, M.J. 1995. Apoplastic water and solute movement: Rules for an old space. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 46:215–236.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Carrow, R.N., D.V. Waddington, and P.E. Rieke. 2001. Turfgrass soil fertility and chemical problems: Assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
- Cramer, G.R., A. Lauchli, and V.S. Polito. 1985. The displacement of Ca2+ by Na+ from the plasmalemma of root cells: A primary response to salt stress? Plant Physiol. 79:207–211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dudeck, A.E., and C.H. Peacock. 1985. Effects of salinity on seashore paspalum turfgrasses. Agron. J. 77:47–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dudeck, A.E., and C.H. Peacock. 1993. Salinity effects on growth and nutrient uptake of selected water season turf. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 7:680–686.
- Duncan, R.R., and R.N. Carrow. 1999. Turfgrass molecular genetic improvement for abiotic/edaphic stress resistance. Adv. Agron. 67:233–305.
- Duncan, R.R., and R.N. Carrow. 2000. Seashore paspalum: The environmental turfgrass. J. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
- El-Hendawy, S.E., Y. Hu, and U. Schmidhalter. 2005. Growth, ion content, gas exchange, and water relations of wheat genotypes differing in salt tolerances. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56:123–134.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Epstein, E., J.D. Norlyn, D.W. Rush, R.W. Kingsbury, D.B. Kelley, G.A. Cunningham, and A.F. Wrona. 1980. Saline culture of crops: A genetic approach. Science (Washington, DC) 210:399–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Flowers, T.J. 1999. Salinization and horticultural production. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 78:1–4.
- Flowers, T.J., S.A. Flowers, M.A. Hajibagheri, and A.R. Yeo. 1990. Salt tolerance in the halophytic wild rice, Porteresia coarctata Tateoka. New Phytol. 114:675–684.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Flowers, T.J., P.F. Troke, and A.R. Yeo. 1977. The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:89–121.[Web of Science]
- Flowers, T.J., and A.R. Yeo. 1986. Ion relations of plants under drought and salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13:75–91.[Web of Science]
- Georgiaturf. 2007. University of Georgia turfgrass program web-site. Turfgrass section. www.georgiaturf.com
- Glenn, E.P. 1987. Relationship between cations accumulation and water content of salt-tolerant grasses and a sedge. Plant Cell Environ. 10:205–212.
- Glenn, E.P., M.C. Watson, J.W. O'Leary, and R.D. Axelson. 1992. Comparison of salt tolerance and osmotic adjustment of low-sodium and high-sodium subspecies of the C4 halophytes, Atriplex canescens. Plant Cell Environ. 15:711–718.[CrossRef]
- Grattan, S.R., and C.M. Grieve. 1999. Salinity–mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 78:127–157.
- Grattan, S.R., C.M. Grieve, J.A. Poss, P.H. Robison, D.L. Suarez, and S.E. Benes. 2004. Evaluation of salt-tolerant forages for sequential water reuse systems. Agric. Water Manage. 70:109–120.[CrossRef]
- Grieve, C.M., and H. Fujiyama. 1987. The response of two cultivars to external Na/Ca ratio. Plant Soil 103:245–250.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Grieve, C.M., J.A. Poss, S.R. Grattan, D.L. Suarez, S.E. Benes, and P.H. Robinson. 2004. Evaluation of salt-tolerant forages for sequential water reuse systems. II. Plant-ion relations. Agric. Water Manage. 70:121–135.
- Heslop-Harrison, J.S., and B.J. Reger. 1986. Chloride and potassium ions and turgidity in the grass stigma. J. Plant Physiol. 124:55–60.[Web of Science]
- Hester, M.W., I.A. Mendelssohn, and K.L. McKee. 2001. Species and population variation to salinity stress in Panicum hemitomon, Spartina patens, and Spartina alterniflora: Morphological and physiological constraints. Environ. Exp. Bot. 46:277–297.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Hoagland, D.R., and D.I. Arnon. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. 347. Univ. of California Agric. Exp. Stn., Berkeley.
- Lee, G.L., R.N. Carrow, and R.R. Duncan. 2004a. Photosynthetic responses to salinity stress of halophytic seashore paspalum ecotypes. Plant Sci. 166:1417–1425.
- Lee, G.J., R.N. Carrow, and R.R. Duncan. 2005. Growth and water relations responses to salt stress in halophytic seashore paspalum ecotypes. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 104:221–236.[CrossRef]
- Lee, G.J., R.R. Duncan, and R.N. Carrow. 2004b. Salinity tolerance of seashore paspalum ecotypes: Shoot growth responses and criteria. HortScience 39:1138–1142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Leidi, E.O., and J.F. Saiz. 1997. Is salinity tolerance related to Na accumulation in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings? Plant Soil 190:67–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Lerner, H.R., G.N. Amzallag, Y. Friedman, and P. Goloubinoff. 1994. The response of plants to salinity: From turgor adjustments to genome modification. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 42:285–300.
- Maas, E.V. 1987. Salt tolerance of plants. p. 57–75. In B.R. Christie (ed.) Handbook of plant science in agriculture. CRS Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Marcum, K.B., and C.L. Murdoch. 1994. Salinity tolerance mechanisms of six C4 turfgrasses. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 119:779–784.
- Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
- Rains, D.W. 1987. Metabolic energy cost for plant cells exposed to salinity. p. 91–93. In D.W. Newman and K.G. Willson (ed.) Models in plant physiology and biochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Reimann, C., and S.W. Breckle. 1993. Sodium relations in Chenopodiaceae: A comparative approach. Plant Cell Environ. 16:323–328.[CrossRef]
- Rogers, M.E., A.D. Craig, R.E. Munns, T.D. Colmer, P.G.H. Nichols, C.V. Malcolm, E.G. Barrett-Lennard, A.J. Brown, W.S. Semple, P.M. Evans, K. Cowley, S.J. Hughes, R. Snowball, S.J. Bennett, G.C. Sweeney, B.S. Dear, and M.A. Ewing. 2005. The potential for developing fodder plants for the salt-affected areas of southern and eastern Australia: An overview. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 45:301–329.[CrossRef]
- Rubinigg, M., F. Posthumus, M. Ferschke, J.T.M. Elzenga, and I. Stulen. 2003. Effects of NaCl salinity on 15N-nitreate fluxes and specific root length in the halophyte Plantago martima L. Plant Soil 250:201–213.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sairam, R.K., A. Tyagi, and V. Chinnusamy. 2006. Salinity tolerance: Cellular mechanisms and gene regulation. In B. Huang (ed.) Plant–environment interactions. 3rd ed. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
- SAS Institute. 2001. SAS, version 8. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
- Semple, W.S., I.A. Cole, and T.B. Koen. 2003. Performance of some perennial grasses on severely salinized sites on the inland slopes of New South Wales. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 43:357–371.[CrossRef]
- Wei, W., P.E. Bilsborrow, P. Hooley, D.A. Fincham, E. Lombi, and B.P. Forster. 2003. Salinity induced differences in growth, ion distribution and partitioning in barley between the cultivars Maythorpe and its derived mutant Golden Promise. Plant Soil 250:183–191.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Wolf, O., R. Munns, M.L. Tonnet, and W.D. Jeschke. 1991. The role of the stem in the partitioning of Na+ and K+ in salt-treated barley. J. Exp. Bot. 42:697–704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zali, D.M., D. Fisher, and M.Q. Garner. 1956. Photometric determination of chloride in water. Anal. Chem. 28:1665–1668.