Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Figure 2. Relationship between net photosynthesis and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for mite-infested (+M) and control (–M) leaves of cotton plants grown in pots in the field. Effect of mite treatment for each PPFD level is ns = not significant; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Boxes show parameters (mean ± SE) of the light-response curve (Eq. [1]), i.e., light-saturated photosynthesis (Pmax, µmol CO2 m–2 s–1), respiration (R, µmol CO2 m–2 s–1), and a fitted parameter of curvature [b, (µmol m–2 s–1) –1]. DAS, days after sowing.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome