Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 30 July 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:1451-1458 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Small-Scale Bread-Quality-Test Performance Heritability in Bread Wheat: Influence of High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits and the 1BL.1RS Translocation

Z. Nishioa,*, K. Takatab, M. Itoa, T. Tabikia, T. M. Ikedab, Y. Fujitab, W. Maruyama-Funatsukic, N. Irikic and H. Yamauchia

a National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region (Memuro), Shinsei, Memuro, Hokkaido 082-0071, Japan
b National Agricultural Research Center for Western Region, 6-12-1 Nishi-Fukatsucho, Fukuyama, Hiroshima 721-8514, Japan
c National Agricultural Research Center for the Hokkaido Region (Sapporo), 1 Hitsujigaoka, Toyohira, Sapporo, Hokkaido 062-8555, Japan

* Corresponding author (zenta{at}affrc.go.jp).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Small-scale bread-quality assays (grain protein content, SDS-sedimentation volume [SDSS], and single-kernel characterization system [SKCS] grain hardness) represent important tools in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding. The influence of high-molecular-weight glutenin (HMWG) subunits and the 1BL.1RS translocation on small-scale bread-quality assays and their heritability was investigated for F3 and F4 lines of two wheat populations. Lines with HMWG subunits 5+10 at Glu-D1 showed significantly greater SDSS volume and SKCS hardness than those with subunits 2+12 or 4+12. Lines with HMWG subunit 20 at Glu-B1 had a significantly lower SDSS volume than those with HMWG subunits 7+8 or 7+9. F4 lines bearing the 1BL.1RS translocation had significantly greater protein content. The distribution of SDSS volumes suggested that most bore the undesirable HMWG subunits 2+12, 4+12 or 20, but could be selected against if the SDSS volume <6.0 mL. For SDSS volume, lines with HMWG subunits 5+10 had greater heritability in upward screening, whereas those with HMWG subunits 2+12 or 4+12 had greater heritability in downward screening. The above screening criterion provides an excellent tool for bread quality-based wheat breeding, irrespective of hard x hard or hard x soft wheat crosses.

Abbreviations: FPS, flour particle size • HMWG, high-molecular-weight glutenin • SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis • SDSS, sodium dodecylsulfate sedimentation • SKCS, single kernel characterization system


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
IN A WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding program targeting bread quality, small-scale quality tests are indispensable in screening early-generation plant materials due to the limitation of sample size. Screening for higher grain protein content is essential in increasing gluten content, which in turn improves loaf volume. To estimate gluten quality, small-scale quality tests that measure swelling power and solubility have been developed: Zeleny test (Zeleny, 1947), sedimentation test (Pinckney et al., 1957), and SDS-sedimentation (SDSS) volume test (Axford et al., 1979). Original or modified SDSS volume tests have been widely employed to predict bread quality in wheat breeding programs (Silvera et al., 1993; Weegels et al., 1996; Takata et al., 1999).

In terms of gluten composition, Payne et al. (1979) showed that the high molecular weight glutenin (HMWG) subunits 5+10 coded by the Glu-D1 locus (Glu-D1d allele) were dominant in high quality bread wheats, whereas subunits 2+12 (Glu-D1a allele) were generally found in lower quality wheats. HMWG subunits coded by the complex Glu-1 loci situated on the long arms of chromosomes 1A, 1B, and 1D of wheat were shown to play important roles in the physical properties of dough (Payne et al., 1984). The HMWG subunits that are associated with improved bread quality were reported to have an additive effect on increasing the SDSS volume and loaf volume (Moonen et al., 1982; Rogers et al., 1990; Takata et al., 2000, 2002, 2003). From the point of view of practical breeding, analysis of the effect of SDSS volume screening on the composition of HMWG subunits will be beneficial because of its high throughput potential.

In wheat cultivars with a 1BL.1RS translocation, the short arm of the 1B wheat chromosome is replaced by the short arm of the 1R rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome. The 1RS arm of rye has been widely used in breeding programs as a resistance source to several diseases and thus as a source of greater potential productivity (Rajaram et al., 1983; Carver and Rayburn, 1994). On the other hand, serious defects in bread quality such as poor mixing tolerance, dough stickiness, and low bread volume have been reported with the presence of the translocation (Dhaliwal et al., 1987; Dhaliwal and MacRitchie, 1990; Lee et al., 1995). Previous studies suggested that HMWG subunits 5+10 played a compensating role for the loss of bread quality associated with 1BL.1RS translocation (Sreeramulu and Singh, 1994; Pflüger et al., 1998; Martín et al., 2001).

Harder wheat grains produce flour with a larger particle size and greater damaged starch content, characteristics which contribute to greater bread quality (Osborne et al., 1997; Ohm et al., 1998). Grain hardness is largely controlled by puroindolines a and b, proteins encoded by the Pina and Pinb genes, which are tightly linked to the Ha locus on chromosome 5D (Giroux and Morris, 1998). Improvements in the measurement of grain hardness has culminated in the single-kernel characterization system (SKCS), based on the force deformation curve obtained from crushing an individual kernel (Martin et al., 1993).

Grain protein content, SDSS volume, and grain hardness have been shown to display low-moderate, moderate, and high heritability, respectively (Baker et al., 1971; O'Brien and Ronalds, 1984; Fischer et al., 1989; Nishio et al., 2005). It is important to investigate the relationship between screening directions and the heritability of the quantitative traits to optimize selection for breeding (Falconer and Mackay, 1996). However, the influence of screening direction on screening effectiveness and the interactions of HMWG subunits and 1BL.1RS translocation to the heritability of bread quality are poorly documented. From a practical perspective, wheat breeding for bread quality requires an understanding of SDSS volume-based screening criteria, and of the influence of HMWG subunits types or the 1BL.1RS translocation on the heritability of small-scale test-assessed quality. In this study, the heritability of upward and downward screening according to criteria based on grain protein content, SDSS volume, and SKCS grain hardness was investigated using two populations differing in HMWG subunits, 1B type and Pinb allele of their parent lines. The influence of screening direction, HMWG subunits and 1BL.1RS translocation on the heritability of small-scale quality criteria, and the usefulness of SDSS volume and SKCS hardness in the screening of bread-quality wheat were assessed to determine appropriate screening direction (up or down) and strength.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plant Materials
One hundred seventy-two recombinant inbred lines were derived from the cross ‘Hokushin’/KS 831957//Kitami 72/Satsukei 226, termed hereafter the Hokushin population, and an additional 118 lines were derived from the cross Tohoku 195/Satsukei 226//Kitami 72/KS 831957, termed hereafter the Tohoku population. The F3 lines were derived from F2 lines by the bulk method, whereas F4 lines were derived from F3 lines through random individual selection. Lines KS 831957, Satsukei 226, and Tohoku 195 are superior quality hard red winter wheats; and Hokushin and Kitami 72 are soft red winter wheats. The two populations and parent lines were sown in the fall of 2001 and 2002, at the National Agricultural Research Center for the Hokkaido Region (Memuro). Each experimental unit consisted of a single 2.0-m-long row, laterally 0.72 m distant from the adjoining row. All seeds were sown at intervals of 9 cm. Nitrogen was applied at a rate of 60 kg ha–1 at seeding, and an additional 20 kg ha–1 was applied after the April snow melt.

Small-Scale Bread-Making Quality Tests and Calculation of Heritability
Nitrogen content of wheat grain samples was determined using the Dumas combustion method (Rapid-N, Elementar Americas, Inc., Mt. Laurel, NJ) and converted to percentage of protein by multiplying by 5.7 (American Association of Cereal Chemists, 2000). Assessments of grain hardness by the SKCS method (4100 SKCS, Perten Instruments, Springfield, IL), required samples of 50 or 300 kernels for F3 or F4 populations, respectively. Puroindoline genotypes of parent cultivars were determined by the method of Lillemo and Morris (2000). The SDSS volume analysis was performed according to the prolonged micro SDSS volume method of Takata et al. (1999), using a 0.7-g sample ground to pass a 0.3-mm sieve. Grain from F4 lines was conditioned to 14% moisture and milled in a Quadrumat Junior test mill (Brabender GmbH & Co. KG, Duisburg, Germany). Flour particle size (FPS) was measured by laser diffraction particle-size analyzer (Heros & Rodos, Japan Laser Co., Ltd., Tokyo). The HMWG subunits were confirmed by sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 7.5% polyacrylamide gels using flour samples of F4 lines. Using these samples, the presence of the 40-kDa secalin subunit was checked by SDS-PAGE, to confirm the 1BL.1RS translocation (Koebner and Shepherd, 1986). Consequently, 112 lines from the Hokushin population and 72 lines from the Tohoku population were employed for the sequence analysis to confirm homozygosity of HMWG subunits at Glu-1 and further confirm the 1BL.1RS translocation indicated by SDS-PAGE.

Data were analyzed by multifactorial ANOVA. Quality differences between F3 and F4 populations were compared using a paired t test. Tukey–Kramer multiple range tests were employed to differentiate means. To calculate realized heritability, the value of each trait was normalized according to each generation's standard deviation. Realized heritability was estimated from the selection differential and genetic gain between F3 and F4 generations that were screened by 20% of F3 populations both for higher rank (upward screening) or lower rank (downward screening) of each quality index.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characteristics of Parent Cultivars
HMWG subunit phenotype determinations, 1B chromosome types, puroindoline genotypes, grain protein content, SDSS volume, and SKCS hardness of parent cultivars are presented in Table 1. The parents differed by two alleles for Glu-A1, three alleles for Glu-B1, and three alleles for Glu-D1. Only Satsukei 226 bore the 1BL.1RS translocation. All parent cultivars carried the Pina-D1a allele at the Pina locus. Hard wheat parent cultivars (KS 831957, Satsukei 226, and Tohoku 195) bore the Pinb-D1b allele at the Pinb locus, while the soft wheat parent cultivars (Hokushin and Kitami 72) bore the Pinb-D1a allele at the Pinb locus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Glu-1 allele, 1B type, puroindoline b (Pinb) allele, grain protein content (PC), sodium dodecylsulfate sedimentation (SDSS) volume, single kernel characterization system (SKCS) hardness, and median flour particle size diameter (FPS) of the parent wheat cultivars.

 
The SKCS hardness of parent cultivars showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05): KS 831957 had lower SKCS hardness, median FPS diameter, and greater SDSS volume than other hard parent cultivars, but mean SDSS volumes and median FPS diameter did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) for either Satsukei 226 vs. Tohoku 195, or Hokushin vs. Kitami 72 comparisons. Nearly 1% greater than that of Satsukei 226, grain protein contents of Tohoku 195 and KS 831957 were both over 13%, and both significantly greater than those of all other parent cultivars. There was no significant difference in grain protein content between Hokushin and Kitami 72.

Characteristics of F3 and F4 Populations
Comparisons of means and standard deviations of grain protein content, SDSS volume SKCS hardness and median FPS diameter between F3 and F4 populations are presented in Table 2. For both populations, mean protein content was lower in F4 than F3 populations. While the SKCS hardness and median FPS diameter maxima of the two populations were similar, the mean and minimum as well as the range in SDSS of the Hokushin population were less than the Tohoku population. Paired t test comparisons of F3 and F4 populations were significantly different for all quality parameters, except for the SDSS volume of the Hokushin population and SKCS hardness of the Tohoku population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Comparison of means ± standard deviations of percent grain protein content (PC), sodium dodecylsulfate sedimentation (SDSS) volume, single kernel characterization system (SKCS) hardness, and median flour particle size diameter (FPS) between F3 and F4 in the two wheat populations.

 
Effect of HMWG Subunits and 1BL.1RS Translocation on Small-Scale Bread-Making Quality Tests
The result of multifactorial ANOVA for a model based on each Glu-1 allele, 1B chromosome type is shown in Table 3. SDSS volume was significantly affected by Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 alleles in the Hokushin population, whereas SDSS volume was only significantly affected by Glu-D1 alleles in the Tohoku population. SKCS hardness was significantly affected by Glu-D1 alleles for both populations. The 1B chromosome types had a significant influence on protein content in the F4 generation for both populations. There were no significant interactions between 1B chromosome types and HMWG subunits with respect to their effects on small-scale bread-quality parameters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. The multifactorial ANOVA for grain protein content (PC), sodium dodecylsulfate sedimentation (SDSS) volume, single kernel characterization system (SKCS) hardness, and median flour particle size diameter (FPS) in the two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations.

 
Mean values of protein content, SDSS volume and SKCS hardness in the lines classified by Glu-1 alleles and 1B type chromosomes are shown in Table 4. Lines in both populations with HMWG subunits 5+10 at Glu-D1 had a significantly greater SDSS volume, SKCS hardness, and median FPS diameter than lines with either the 2+12 or 4+12 HMWG subunits. In the Hokushin population, lines with HMWG subunit 20 at Glu-B1 had a significantly lower SDSS volume than lines possessing HMWG subunits 7+8 or 7+9. There were no significant differences in SDSS volume and SKCS hardness between lines with HMWG subunits 2+12 vs. 4+12, or between lines with HMWG subunits 7+8 vs. 7+9. For F4 lines of both populations, lines bearing the 1BL.1RS translocation showed significantly greater protein content than their counterparts. In the Tohoku population, F4 lines possessing the 1BL.1RS translocation showed significantly lesser SDSS volume.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Mean values of grain protein content (PC), sodium dodecylsulfate sedimentation (SDSS) volume, single kernel characterization system (SKCS) hardness, and median flour particle size diameter (FPS) of lines of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations classified by high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits and 1B chromosomal types.{dagger}

 
Influence of HMWG Subunits and 1BL.1RS Translocation Types on the Realized Heritability of Small-Scale Bread-Making Qualities
Realized heritability of upward and downward screening for protein content, SDSS volume and SKCS hardness amongst lines classified according to their HMWG subunits and 1B chromosome types are shown in Table 5. The heritability of protein content was low to moderate across all lines, 0.38 to 0.46 in the Hokushin population, and 0.21 to 0.29 in the Tohoku population. Heritability of SDSS volume showed moderate to high heritability values for the both Hokushin (0.77 to 0.89), and Tohoku (0.70 to 0.79) populations. Lines with HMWG subunits 5+10 had greater heritability of SDSS volume in upward screening, whereas lines possessing HMWG subunits 2+12 or 4+12 showed greater heritability in downward screening. The heritability of SKCS hardness showed moderate to higher values, 0.85 to 0.95 for the Hokushin population, and 0.74 to 0.80 for the Tohoku population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Realized heritability of protein content (PC), sodium dodecylsulfate sedimentation (SDSS) volume, single kernel characterization system (SKCS) hardness of the two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations lines classified by high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits and 1B chromosomal types.

 
Influence of HMWG Subunits at Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 to the Distribution of SDSS Volume
The scatter plots of SDSS volume of F3 and F4 lines classified according to their Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 alleles for Hokushin and Tohoku populations, respectively, are shown in Fig. 1 . Within Glu-B1 alleles, 91% of the F3 lines of the Hokushin population with HMWG subunit 20 were distributed in the lower SDSS volume range (<6.0 mL) (Fig. 1). Within Glu-D1 alleles, 90% and 96% of F3 lines of the Hokushin and Tohoku populations with HMWG subunits 2+12 and 4+12 were distributed in the lower SDSS volume range (<6.0 mL). Whereas, 69% and 52% of F3 lines of the Hokushin and Tohoku populations with HMWG subunits 5+10 were distributed in the higher SDSS volume range (≥6.0 mL) (Fig. 1). Distribution of the lines possessing HMWG subunits 2+12, 4+12, and 5+10 overlapped in the low-moderate range (about 4.0– 6.0 mL).


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Relationship of SDSS volume in F3 lines to that in F4 lines classified by high-molecular-weight glutenin (HMWG) subunits at Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 across the two wheat populations. {dagger}Hokushin/KS831957//Kitami 72/Satsukei 226. {ddagger}Tohoku 195/Satsukei 226//Kitami 72/KS 831957.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Understanding the influence of HMWG subunits and 1BL.1RS translocation in small-scale assay bread quality and its heritability is important in achieving an efficient bread-making wheat breeding program. Most studies have shown a negative effect of the 1BL.1RS translocation on bread-making quality (Dhaliwal et al., 1987; Dhaliwal and MacRitchie, 1990; Lee et al., 1995). In 1BL.1RS translocated wheats, the increase of monomeric proteins, such as secalin coded by genes on the 1RS arm, and the concomitant decrease of glutenin content, due to a lack of low molecular weight subunits coded by genes on the 1BS arm, are thought to be responsible for the negative effects of this translocation on flour quality (Graybosch et al., 1990; Lee et al., 1995). The translocation lines had weaker gluten and lowered SDSS and bread loaf volumes (Fenn et al., 1994; Martín et al., 2001).

In our study, mean comparisons between 1B lines and 1BL.1RS translocation lines showed F4 translocation-bearing lines had increased protein content (Table 4). This concurs with the observations of Carver and Rayburn (1995) and Amiour et al. (2002), but is contrary to those of Fenn et al. (1994), where 1BL.1RS translocation lines had a lower protein concentration. Despite the same complement of 1BL.1RS translocation in the both populations, a significant negative influence of 1BL.1RS translocation on SDSS volume was detected only in the F4 Tohoku population (Tables 3 and 4). Contrary to Carver and Rayburn (1995) and Martín et al. (2001), this is likely attributable to differences between the studies in terms of the influence of the genetic background response. Carver and Rayburn (1995) indicated the importance of selecting parents that have strong mixing tolerance and high sedimentation volume for crossing with 1BL.1RS translocation parents. The parent line KS 831957, which had particularly strong mixing tolerance (Maruyama-Funatsuki et al., 2004) and a greater SDSS volume (Table 1), is assumed to have compensated for the negative effect of the 1BL.1RS translocation from Satsukei 226. However, further investigation is necessary to elucidate the reason of different negative effect of 1BL.1RS translocation on SDSS volume in each population. As in the case of Fenn et al. (1994), our study found no significant differences in grain hardness between 1B lines and 1BL.1RS lines, whereas Graybosch et al. (1993), when comparing 1BL.1RS translocation lines to their sisters 1R (1B), found the translocation to have significantly decreased grain hardness. In this study, 1BL.1RS translocation lines had greater heritability of SKCS hardness than 1B lines, but only in the Tohoku population. Carver and Rayburn (1995) noted that the decrease in grain hardness depended on the cross. From a genetic point of view, evidence indicates that quality defects associated with 1BL.1RS are influenced by genetic background, which has a potentially larger effect on quality than 1RS itself (Lee et al., 1995).

Heritability of protein content was found to vary from low to moderate values (O'Brien and Ronalds 1987; Fischer et al., 1989; Nishio et al., 2005). Environmental conditions during the growing season can affect grain protein content (Baker et al., 1971; Fischer et al., 1989) and lower measured heritability. The environmental effects and narrow range of protein contents (9.4– 12.9%) within the lines possessing HMWG subunits 4+12 in the Tohoku population were possible reasons for detecting negative heritability of protein content (Table 5). However, further investigation is required to clarify this question.

A number of studies have reported positive effects of HMWG subunits 5+10 on SDSS volume and loaf volume, but negative effect of HMWG subunits 2+12, 4+12, and 20 (Payne et al., 1987; Rogers et al., 1989; Gupta et al., 1994; Buonocore et al., 1996; Takata et al., 2000, 2002, 2003). The scatter plot of SDSS volume for both populations suggests that most lines bearing HMWG subunits 2+12, 4+12, and 20 could be eliminated by cut-off screening at an SDSS volume of 6.0 mL (Fig. 1). Lines with HMWG subunits 5+10 had greater heritability of SDSS volume in upward screening, whereas lines with HMWG subunits 2+12, 4+12, and 20 were all shown to have greater heritability in downward screening (Table 5). These results confirm the effectiveness of SDSS volume screening in eliminating lines offering poorer bread-making quality, when the population includes undesirable HMWG subunits. Greater heritability of SDSS volume in downward screening in a previous study (Nishio et al., 2005) was postulated to have arisen from the lines possessing HMWG subunits 2+12, 4+12, and 20 more consistently showing lower SDSS volumes (Fig. 1). Nakamura (1999) has shown lines possessing HMWG subunits 2.2+12 and 2+12 are dominant in major wheat cultivars developed in Japan, and the number of lines possessing HMWG subunits 5+10 is very limited. Thus, screening by SDSS volume will be a powerful tool in developing bread-making cultivars in such a genetic background. However, further investigation is needed to verify the effectiveness of SDSS volume in different genetic backgrounds.

In our study, the dominant control of grain hardness by the Pinb gene (Giroux and Morris 1998) in both populations was postulated as a possible reason for the greater heritability of SKCS hardness in crosses involving opposite Pinb alleles (Tables 1 and 5). The mean SKCS hardness was greater in the Tohoku population than in the Hokushin population (Table 2), because of the Pinb alleles in the parent lines (Table 1). However, the mean SKCS hardness was significantly and similarly increased in both populations within the lines possessing HMWG subunits 5+10 (Table 4). This indicates that screening for lines with HMWG subunits 5+10 will be useful in increasing grain hardness, regardless of the combination of Pinb alleles in parent cultivars. Our results concur with the observation that transgenic wheat lines enhanced with the HMWG subunits 5+10 gene showed significantly greater grain hardness than the original wheat line (Rakszegi et al., 2005). Autran (1996) reported HMWG subunits play a major role in endosperm texture. The mechanism of increased grain hardness by HMWG subunits 5+10 is postulated to arise from changes in the glutenin proteins altering the efficiency of deposition and thus overall seed development (Don et al., 2003). However, no direct relationship has been shown between allelic variants of the HMWG subunits and grain hardness. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the mechanism of the effect of HMWG subunits 5+10 on grain hardness.

The effect of HMWG subunits 5+10 in increasing SDSS volume, grain hardness, and FPS provide useful tools in the efficient breeding of quality bread wheat. Lines with HMWG subunits undesirable for bread-making quality were clearly separated on the basis of an SDSS volume criterion, and showed greater heritability in downward screening. Screening using this parameter as a selection criterion will be effective in eliminating lines of inferior bread-making quality both for hard by hard or hard by soft wheat crosses. An improvement in the efficiency of bread quality wheat breeding could thus be achieved by the concurrent screening by SDSS volume and SKCS hardness, along with protein content–based criteria.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to S. Takahashi, M. Oizumi, Y. Matsudaira, H. Nagahama, S. Yamabuki, and H. Shibukawa for their technical assistance.


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication July 17, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome