Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Figure 1. The expected bias in the prediction of the proportion of remobilized N according to Eq. [7] in terms of the proportion of postsilking N uptake allocated to the grain and post silking 15N uptake proportion. Graphs correspond to a true remobilization proportion of 0.65 (continuous lines) and 0.69 (broken lines). For example, with a true remobilization proportion of 0.65, a proportion of postsilking N uptake allocated to the grain of 0.80 and a postsilking 15N uptake proportion of 0.20, the bias is just 0.03. With the same proportion of postsilking N uptake allocated to the grain and a postsilking 15N uptake of 0.30, the bias is between 0.04 and 0.05.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome