Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Fig. 1. Mean genotypic value of the simulated fraction selected by adjusted line mean, best linear unbiased prediction considering environmental effects (BLUP[E]), best line unbiased prediction considering environmental effects and pedigree information (BLUP[E+A]), and best linear unbiased prediction considering environmental effects and genetic similarities (BLUP[E+GS]) for different heritabilities h2 ([a] h2 = 0.9; [b] h2 = 0.5; [c] h2 = 0.1). The considered designs are balanced (0% missing values) or unbalanced (30, 60, and 90% missing values randomly distributed in the dataset). See Table 2, 3, and 4 for significant differences between selection strategies.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome