Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 8 September 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:2151-2154 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, G. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, G. L.

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS-NOTES

Effects of Xenia on Aspergillus flavus Infection and Aflatoxin Accumulation in Maize Inbreds

Hilarie D. Gardner*, W. Paul Williams and Gary L. Windham

USDA-ARS, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit, Box 9555, Mississippi State, MS 39762

* Corresponding author (hgardner{at}msa-msstate.ars.usda.gov)


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Aspergillus flavus Link:Fries infection and aflatoxin contamination pose an economic threat to maize (Zea mays L.) producers of the United States. Efforts to identify germplasm resistant to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation have raised questions regarding the role of xenia, the pollen effect on the embryo and endosperm, in resistance of maize grain to the pathogen. The objective of this study was to evaluate the importance of xenia on A. flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation in seed of eight inbred lines with different levels of resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination. Resistant and susceptible maize lines were hand-pollinated following a diallel mating design to produce seed for trials. The ears were inoculated 14 d after pollination with A. flavus spores. Grain was plated on agar to determine the extent of A. flavus infection and analyzed to measure aflatoxin content. Significant differences were detected among seed parents for both aflatoxin accumulation and A. flavus infection in both 2003 and 2004. The effects of pollen source were not significant on aflatoxin contamination or A. flavus infection in either 2003 or 2004. These results are consistent with xenia having little or no effect on A. flavus infection or aflatoxin accumulation. The results further suggest that reliable evaluation of A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination can be gained from open-pollinated field experiments.

Abbreviations: GLM, General Linear Models • LSD, least significant difference • NRRL, Northern Regional Research Laboratory


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
SINCE ITS discovery in 1960 as the causal agent of turkey X disease, aflatoxin, produced by the fungus A. flavus, has been shown to be linked to numerous human and animal diseases (Bennett and Klich, 2003; Gourama and Bullerman, 1995). Due to the ill effects stemming from inadvertent inhalation or ingestion of this toxin, contamination of maize grain with aflatoxin ranks among the primary concerns of maize producers in the Midwest and southeastern USA today. Because aflatoxin is a known carcinogen, stringent regulations have been put into effect by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Aflatoxin B1 is considered the most toxic compound of the aflatoxin family. Currently, grain having a concentration of aflatoxin B1 exceeding the threshold of 20 ng g–1 is banned from interstate trade (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1992). Enforcement of these restrictions has caused substantial economic losses to maize growers of the southeast and midwest regions of the United States. As a result, maize breeders and researchers have been attempting to discover factors influencing aflatoxin production by A. flavus to determine an effective means to reduce or eliminate aflatoxin production in grain.

Climatic conditions in the southern regions of the USA tend to favor preharvest contamination of maize grain with aflatoxin (Lillehoj et al., 1975; Zuber et al., 1976). Numerous studies have likewise implicated heat, water, nutrient, and insect stress in providing favorable conditions for A. flavus infection and subsequent aflatoxin accumulation (Jones and Duncan, 1981; Jones et al., 1981; McMillian et al., 1985; Widstrom et al., 1975, 1990). To combat aflatoxin contamination of maize grain, plant breeders and geneticists are currently screening germplasm and selecting maize lines with the goal of incorporating resistance traits into commercially grown hybrids (Tubajika and Damann, 2001; Zuber, 1977). Currently, many researchers are investigating proteins in various maize lines to identify those linked to inhibition of A. flavus infection and reduced aflatoxin accumulation. Proteins associated with antifungal properties (Chen et al., 2001; Guo et al., 1998; Nielsen et al., 2001) and insect defense mechanisms (Pechan et al., 2002; Rector et al., 2002; Williams et al., 2005) in maize plants have lately garnered interest, and more studies are being conducted on proteins present in the cob and kernel (Alfaro, 1999; Magbanua, 2004) that may be involved in A. flavus resistance.

Investigations of resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation in maize grain are complex because the seed consists of genetically different tissues: the diploid embryo and triploid endosperm that results from double fertilization, as well as the maternally derived pericarp. Other maternally derived tissues of the ear such as the silks, husks, and cobs may also play a role in fungal establishment and toxin accumulation in the seed. Recent studies of xenia have focused on its impact on grain yield components such as kernel weight, moisture, and protein composition (Bulant and Gallais, 1998; Bulant et al., 2000; Seka and Cross, 1995; Seka et al., 1995; Tsai and Tsai, 1990; Weingartner et al., 2002). Researchers studying A. flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation have generally based their observations on grain produced on open-pollinated ears, thus the role of xenia in A. flavus and aflatoxin resistance in the embryo and endosperm has yet to be clearly defined.

The objective of this investigation was to evaluate A. flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation in grain produced on eight inbred lines that had been pollinated in all possible combinations. This differed from traditional diallels in that the analyses were conducted on grain containing the F1 embryo that was produced on an inbred plant, rather than grain produced on an F1 plant. The effects of each inbred line used as a pollen source for the seed parents were compared to determine the relative importance of xenia on A. flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation among this group of inbred lines. The information gained from these analyses should help to identify inbred lines that would be most useful in maize breeding programs targeted at reducing aflatoxin levels in grain and in determining whether xenia should be considered in germplasm evaluations.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Resistant maize inbred lines, Mp313E, Mp420, Tx601, and Mo18W (Scott and Zummo, 1990, 1992; Williams et al., 2003; Windham and Williams, 2002), and susceptible inbred lines, SC212M, SC229, Ab24E, and Mp339 (Williams et al., 2003) were planted at the R.R. Foil Plant Science Research Farm, Mississippi State, Mississippi, on 17 Apr. 2003 and 20 Apr. 2004. Plots were single rows 4 m long and spaced 1 m apart. Plots were overplanted and thinned to 15 plants after seedling emergence. In 2003, plants were hand-pollinated to produce seed of all possible crosses, including reciprocals, among the inbred lines. In 2004, all possible crosses among the inbred lines were again made, but each inbred line was also self-pollinated. Because the inbred lines differed in maturity, additional rows of each line were planted in rows bordering the experimental trial in both 2003 and 2004. Plantings in these border rows were initiated 3 wk before the experiment was planted and continued for 5 wk. These additional rows were planted to provide a source of pollen for making crosses between genotypes differing in maturity. Planting all seed parents on the same day, but making multiple plantings of each inbred line to provide pollen, minimized the time required to complete pollinations of the seed parent. Each seed parent–pollen parent combination was assigned to a single-row plot. Plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. In 2003, each replication included seven plots of each inbred line for a total of 56 plots per replication. The inbred line in each plot was hand-pollinated with pollen from the designated line. In 2004, one additional plot of each line was included and self-pollinated.

Twelve to fourteen days after hand-pollination, the primary ears of each maize plant were inoculated using the side-needle technique described by Zummo and Scott (1989) with A. flavus isolate NRRL 3357, an isolate known to produce aflatoxin in maize. Ears from each row (approximately 15 ears) were hand-harvested, bulked, and shelled. The grain was thoroughly mixed, and a 150-g sample was taken for aflatoxin analysis. The samples were ground using a Romer mill (Union, MO), and the concentration of aflatoxin was determined using Aflatest (Vicam, Watertown, MA) which can detect aflatoxin levels as low as 1 ng g–1.

To determine the percentage of kernels infected by A. flavus, a sample of 130 kernels that exhibited no visual signs of damage was taken from each plot, surface sterilized, and plated on Czapek solution agar (29 g L–1) with NaCl (75 g L–1) (Zummo and Scott, 1992). After 7 d, the number of kernels with A. flavus colonies were counted and the percentage of kernels infected by the fungus determined.

The aflatoxin data were transformed as ln(y + 1), where y is equal to the concentration in ng g–1 of aflatoxin in a sample, for analysis of variance using the SAS General Linear Models (GLM) procedure. This transformation was performed to provide a more normally distributed set of data for statistical analysis. For both aflatoxin concentration and fungal infection data, the variation associated with genotypes, or seed parent–pollen parent combinations, was partitioned into components for seed parents, pollen parents, and the interaction between seed and pollen parents. Means for A. flavus infection and aflatoxin concentration in grain among seed and pollen parents were compared using Fisher's Protected Least Significance Difference (FLSD) at P = 0.05 level of significance. Different degrees of freedom for each year resulted from an inadequate production of grain for some crosses.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The mean levels of aflatoxin contamination and A. flavus infection for each inbred line used as a seed parent and as a pollen source in 2003 are given in Table 1. Because sufficient grain was not produced in crosses with Ab24E, data for this line were not included in the statistical analysis. The analysis of variance indicated that seed parent was a significant source of variation for both aflatoxin contamination and A. flavus infection, but the variation associated with pollen source or the interaction of seed parents and pollen source was not statistically significant (P = 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Aflatoxin contamination and A. flavus infection of maize kernels produced on seven inbred lines hand-pollinated following a diallel mating design and inoculated with A. flavus in 2003.

 
Among the seed parents, SC212M exhibited the highest levels of aflatoxin contamination when averaged across pollen sources (2160 ng g–1). Mp313E, which was developed and released as a source of resistance to A. flavus (Scott and Zummo, 1990), exhibited the lowest levels of aflatoxin contamination. The mean aflatoxin contamination level across pollen sources was 10 ng g–1. Tx601 and Mp420, also aflatoxin-resistant lines, and SC229 had significantly less aflatoxin contamination than the more susceptible lines, but higher levels than Mp313E. The mean levels of aflatoxin contamination did not differ among the seven lines when used as sources of pollen.

As a seed parent, SC212M exhibited the highest percentage of A. flavus–infected kernels. Averaged across pollen sources, the mean level of infection for SC212M was 23%. SC212M also exhibited the highest level of aflatoxin contamination. Differences among the other lines as seed parents were not statistically significant. As sources of pollen, the lines did not differ in percentage of A. flavus–infected kernels.

In 2004, self-pollinated plants were also included in the field trials. Unfortunately, insufficient grain was produced by Mp313E and Mp420 for inclusion of these lines as seed parents in the statistical analyses. Because of these differences, the data from 2004 were not combined with the data from 2003 for statistical analysis. As in 2003, seed parent was a significant source of variation in the analysis of variance in 2004. The variance associated with neither source of pollen nor the interaction of seed parent and pollen source was statistically significant (P = 0.05).

Mp339, as a seed parent, exhibited the highest level of aflatoxin contamination (2677 ng g–1) in 2004 (Table 2). SC212M and Mo18W had the second highest levels of aflatoxin in 2004. These three inbred lines also had the highest levels of aflatoxin in 2003. Tx601 and SC229, as seed parents, had the lowest levels of aflatoxin contamination in 2004. In 2003, only Mp313E had lower levels of aflatoxin contamination. As in 2003, there were no significant differences among the eight inbred lines when used as sources of pollen for either aflatoxin accumulation or percentage of A. flavus–infected kernels. Among the inbred lines used as seed parents in 2004, SC212M again had the highest level of A. flavus–infected kernels (33%). Mp420 exhibited the second highest percentage of kernel infection in 2004, and only Ab24E and Tx601 had significantly lower levels of kernel infection. In this investigation, the inbred lines with high percentages of A. flavus–infected kernels tended to have high levels of aflatoxin contamination as well.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Aflatoxin contamination and A. flavus infection of maize kernels produced on six inbred lines hand-pollinated following a diallel mating design and inoculated with A. flavus in 2004.

 
The lack of statistically significant differences associated with source of pollen and the interaction between seed parents and pollen sources for both percentage of A. flavus infection and the concentration of aflatoxin contamination are consistent with a conclusion that xenia, the effect of the pollen on the embryo and endosperm, does not play a major role in the expression of these traits. It appears that evaluation for resistance or susceptibility to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination can be achieved in open-pollinated field experiments conducted on maize so that the harvested grain is described solely in terms of the maternal parent. This would mitigate the need for controlled pollinations using a specific genotype as a source of pollen. Although dependable germplasm evaluations can probably be performed with open pollination, it would be imprudent to completely rule out xenia's influence in all types of experiments since this particular study was based on two environments only and a fixed set of lines. In those studies conducted to identify genes or proteins associated with resistance to aflatoxin accumulation or fungal infection, it would be desirable to define the genotype of both embryo and endosperm to avoid introducing unaccounted for genetic variability. The results of this investigation are also consistent with the proposal that maternal tissues such as pericarp, silk, husk, and cob, rather than the embryo or endosperm, may play key roles in determining the resistance or susceptibility among this group of inbred lines of maize (Guo et al., 1998; Rector et al., 2002).


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors express their appreciation to Clarence E. Watson and Jixiang Wu who provided advice and statistical support for the experiments and to Ladonna Owens for her technical assistance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.


   NOTES
TOP
 NOTES
ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This paper is a joint contribution of USDA-ARS and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station and is published as journal no. J-10790 of the Miss. Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn.

Received for publication March 28, 2006.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, G. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, G. L.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome