Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 18 May 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1622-1629 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hijmans, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bonman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hijmans, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bonman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hijmans, R. J.

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

Geographic Distribution of Common and Dwarf Bunt Resistance in Landraces of Triticum aestivum subsp. aestivum

J. Michael Bonmana,*, Harold E. Bockelmana, Blair J. Goatesa, Don E. Oberta, Patrick E. McGuireb, Calvin O. Qualsetb and Robert J. Hijmansc

a USDA-ARS, Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research Unit, 1691 South 2700 West, Aberdeen, ID 83210
b Genetic Resources Conservation Program, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis CA 95616
c International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines

* Corresponding author (mbonman{at}uidaho.edu)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Landrace accessions of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum) from the USDA-ARS National Small Grains Collection (NSGC) have been tested systematically for the past 25 yr for disease resistance. We analyzed the resistance of 10 759 common wheat accessions to common bunt (CB) caused by Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Wint. and T. laevis Kühn, and 8167 to dwarf bunt (DB) caused by T. controversa Kühn with respect to geographic origin, relationship to color of awn, glume, and kernel of accessions, and phenotypic variation within areas of high frequency of resistance. A clear center of concentration was evident for CB resistance extending from Serbia and Montenegro through Macedonia, Turkey, and Iran with the highest frequency of resistance occurring in Kosovo province in Serbia and Montenegro (36%) and Bakhtaran province in Iran (40.8%). Compared to CB resistance (5.5% of total tested), DB resistance was more rare (1.3% of total tested). DB resistance was concentrated in accessions from Iran, Turkey, and Serbia and Montenegro with the highest frequency (58%) occurring in Hakkari province in southeastern Turkey. CB resistance was positively associated with lightly pigmented kernels and negatively associated with lightly pigmented awns and glumes. Analysis of accessions from areas with unusually high frequency of resistance suggested that DB resistant accessions from Hakkari are genetically diverse, whereas CB resistant accessions from Bakhtaran may be much less so.

Abbreviations: CB, common bunt • DB, dwarf bunt • GRIN, Germplasm Resources Information Network • NSGC, National Small Grains Collection


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
BUNT and other smut diseases have probably been associated with wheat cultivation since the crop's domestication (Fischer and Holton, 1957). Common bunt occurs on both spring and winter wheat worldwide and DB is found on winter wheat in regions with persistent snow cover (Goates and Peterson, 1999). Although chemical seed treatments can effectively control these diseases, especially CB, resistant cultivars remain desirable for bunt management in developing countries (Saari et al., 1996), for organic production of wheat, and as a lower-cost alternative to chemical treatment. The fungi causing DB and CB are closely related and resistance to both diseases is conferred by the same 15 major resistance genes (Goates, 1996).

During the past 100 yr the USDA has acquired more than 54 454 accessions of cultivated wheat and wild relatives of wheat, including 19 615 landrace accessions of common wheat. Systematic characterization of the collection began about 25 yr ago and some disease and insect resistance evaluations began even earlier. Also, many of the accessions have been characterized for various agronomic, spike, kernel, and quality traits. Since the evaluation program began, many of the common wheat accessions in the NSGC have been tested for resistance to CB and DB, including 97% of the landrace accessions present in the collection. This compilation represents one of the most complete sets of disease evaluation data collected by the NSGC. The data can be accessed through the USDA-ARS Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) database at www.ars-grin.gov/npgs. The purposes of the present research were to (i) analyze the NSGC data for CB and DB resistance among common wheat landrace accessions to elucidate relationships between resistance and other characteristics, including geographic origin and awn, glume, and kernel color and (ii) generate information to guide future wheat acquisition, evaluation, and utilization.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Disease Resistance Assessment
Landrace accessions of common wheat from the NSGC were tested for CB reaction at Pendleton, OR from 1981 to 1986 by R.J. Metzger and at Aberdeen, ID from 1992 to 2004 by B.J. Goates. A total of 4478 accessions were tested at Pendelton and 9177 were tested at Aberdeen. Several thousand accessions were tested in more than one experiment and for these the highest disease score was used, resulting in 10 759 accessions in the analysis of CB resistance. Seeds were heavily surface-inoculated with teliospores of the CB pathogens before planting 4 to 7 cm deep in single 1.5 m rows when soil temperatures were 5 to 10° C (Goates, 1996). In the tests in Pendleton during 1982 and 1984 specific accessions were inoculated with one of three pathogenic races, and in 1985 and 1986 specific accessions were inoculated with a single race or a race composite. In Aberdeen during 1992 to 2004 one of three different race composites were used separately in different years to represent a broad spectrum of virulence. Specific information on the pathogenic race, race composite, the virulence genes contained in each race, and the inoculum used in each experiment is available on GRIN.

For DB, 8167 landrace accessions were tested near Logan, UT, from 1978 to 2005. Seeds were sown about 2 cm deep in a furrow 8 to 10 cm deep, timed so that plants were at the 2- to 3-leaf stage before the onset of dormancy in late fall (Goates, 1996). Inoculum was applied onto the soil after planting as a water suspension at a rate of about 0.25 g of teliospores per row. The inoculum was prepared by suspending ground bunted spikes in water and filtering the resulting teliospores suspension through cheesecloth. The inoculum was a composite of all named T. controversa races and other isolates from throughout the western US. The composite is maintained by periodically adding races to inoculum for the nursery, and then harvesting smutted spikes from both resistant and susceptible genotypes.

For both diseases the number of bunted and healthy spikes per row was scored after physiologic maturity, growth stage 92 (Zadoks et al., 1974), then recorded in GRIN as a percentage relative to the susceptible checks, cultivars Red Bobs for CB, and Cheyenne for DB, which were sown every 20 rows throughout the nurseries. Trials where the susceptible checks showed less than 70% infection were not used. These data and other accession level data were extracted from the GRIN for this report.

Agronomic Descriptor Data
Nearly all of the landrace accessions in the NSGC have been scored for growth habit based on spring-sown evaluations at Aberdeen, ID (43°2' N, 112°49' W, 1331 m elevation). Accessions flowering normally were designated as having spring habit, those that did not flower as having winter habit, and those that flowered very late as facultative. Most of the accessions tested in the CB nurseries had spring habit and most of those tested in the DB nurseries were classified as winter habit. Using color charts and standard rating codes, about 6000 landrace accessions have been scored for awn and glume color and more than 8000 have been scored for kernel color. Landrace classification was determined by the NSGC curator (H.E. Bockelman) based on information available in the passport data and is somewhat subjective.

In addition to the information from the GRIN database, we used information for most of the Iranian accessions from field experiments done at the University of California Davis Agronomy Research Farm (38° 32' N, 121° 46' W, 16 m elevation) from 1991 to 1996. These accessions were received by C.O. Qualset from the University of Tehran from 1986 to 1989 and represent 90% of the Iranian landrace accessions within the NSGC. Plantings were made in November or December each year. Irrigation was applied when needed, usually two times each year during pre- and post-heading. Accessions were sown in single 2.5-m rows spaced 60 cm apart laid out 20 rows wide in a serpentine pattern with spring habit check cultivars Yecora Rojo and Anza repeated throughout the experiment. Data were obtained for: days to heading and maturity (expressed as days past 31 March); flag leaf blade length and width (cm, two leaves for each accession); mature plant height (cm); spike length (mm) measured as the distance from the tip of the apical spike to the collar; awn length (mm); number of spikelets per spike; and kernel weight (mg kernel–1) based on 50 kernels. Awn, glume, and kernel color were also recorded.

Data Analysis
Accessions were classified as resistant if 5% or less disease incidence relative to the susceptible check was recorded. Countries of origin were classified into regions based on the United Nations designations for World Macroregions (United Nations, 2000). Nonoverlap of the 95 or 99% binomial confidence intervals was used as a basis for determining significant differences between accessions from various geographic groupings.

Sites of collection for individual wheat accessions were georeferenced by one of the following methods based on the level of detail available in the locality data: (1) collector notes indicating geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) based on maps or GPS instruments; (2) gazetteers either from the GEOnet Names Server (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2004) or the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names Online (J. Paul Getty Trust, 2000) when the collection site was named; or (3) ArcView 8.2 (ESRI, 2002) software when collector's notes indicated distance and direction from a city or village or other landmark. We obtained coordinates for a total of 7727 accessions tested for CB resistance and 6094 accessions tested for DB resistance. Accessions that lacked specific locality or coordinates were mapped either to state/province or to country level only and these data were used in analyses that did not require identification of the specific collection site. Elevation data were derived from either collector notes indicating elevation or the GTOPO30 dataset on the Global GIS Global Coverage DVD developed by the U.S. Geological Survey and the American Geological Society (Hearn et al., 2003). DIVA-GIS 5.2 was used to determine the fraction of the accessions that were resistant in 100- by 100-km grid cells (Hijmans et al., 2005b). DIVA-GIS was also used to extract climate data for all accessions from the WorldClim database (Hijmans et al., 2005a).

Not all disease resistance and other descriptor data were available in GRIN for each accession, so associations of CB or DB resistance to awn, glume, and kernel color were assessed on subsets where data for both traits were available. Because few NSGC descriptor data were available within GRIN for Iranian landraces, data collected from UC Davis were used to test for associations between disease resistance with awn, glume, and kernel color. To simplify the analysis color data were classified as either lightly pigmented (white, amber, or yellow) or pigmented (brown, bronze, tan, or red). Data from 1932 to 4797 accessions were available for analysis for each disease-trait combination. Fisher's Exact Test was used to ascertain if there was a relationship between pairs of variables (Langsrud, 2004).

Accessions from certain geographic locations showed unusually high frequencies of resistance. To compare the morphological variation among resistant accessions from these locations with that of other accessions, NSGC data were used for DB and 1991 UC Davis data were used for CB. The NSGC data consisted of images of spikes and kernels captured with a color flat-bed scanner and accessible via GRIN. The 1991 field planting at UC Davis included 248 accessions from Bakhtaran province in Iran and 1858 accessions from other areas of Iran. Values for the quantitative traits measured in the trial were adjusted with Agrobase software (Agronomix Software, 2004) using the quadratic method of moving means. This method adjusts entry values based on the check means and two adjacent rows on either side of the entry. In the case of unbordered end rows, the adjacent four rows on the existing side were used to adjust the entry value. A one-tailed F-test was used to compare variances for the measured traits of the CB-susceptible and resistant accessions from Bakhtaran and other common wheat accessions from throughout Iran that were included in the trial.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Relationship to Geographic Origin
General Distribution
Three macroregions, Southern Europe, Western Asia, and South-central Asia, had a significantly higher (P < 0.01) frequency of both CB- and DB-resistant landrace accessions compared to the total for all other regions (Table 1). The frequencies of CB-resistant accessions from South-central Asia, Southern Europe, and Western Asia were 6.9, 6.7, and 7.9%, respectively. The frequency of CB-resistant accessions from elsewhere (0.4%, n = 2485) was significantly less (P < 0.01). Similarly, the frequencies of DB-resistant accessions from South-central Asia, Southern Europe, and Western Asia were 1.2, 0.7, and 5.3%, respectively. No DB-resistant accessions from elsewhere were found (n = 1472). Accessions from South-central Asia, Southern Europe, and Western Asia accounted for 97.8% of the CB-resistant accessions and all of the DB-resistant accessions identified within the collection. Table 2 shows that four of the 40 countries within these three regions (Serbia and Montenegro, Macedonia, Turkey, and Iran) accounted for 92% of the CB-resistant accessions identified, while Serbia and Montenegro, Turkey, and Iran accounted for all of the identified DB-resistant accessions. Serbia and Montenegro had the highest frequency of CB resistance and Turkey had the highest frequency of DB resistance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Numbers of accessions of common wheat tested and resistant{dagger} to common and dwarf bunt from nine geographic regions{ddagger}.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Numbers of accessions of common wheat tested and resistant{dagger} to common and dwarf bunt from four countries and from all other countries.

 
Common Bunt Resistance
There is a nearly contiguous geographic band with high frequency of CB resistance from southern Serbia and Montenegro through Iran (Fig. 1A) and this area represents a "center of concentration" sensu Ward (1962) for CB resistance. Most of Bulgaria and a small part of northeastern Greece lie between Macedonia and Turkey (Fig. 1B), but only 76 spring-habit landrace accessions from Bulgaria and Greece were available in the NSGC. Sixty-five of these accessions were tested for CB resistance, none were resistant and few of the accessions had sufficient information to map their origin to a specific geographic point (Fig. 1B). At least one landrace from Greece, PI 116301, is reported to have CB resistance gene Bt10 (Metzger and Silbaugh, 1971), but was susceptible to the races used in NSGC testing and to race X-1 from the Pacific Northwest of the USA (Metzger and Kendrick, 1967). Landrace accessions identified within the GRIN database are generally accessions from farmers' fields or markets collected either before the era of modern plant breeding or in less favorable environments where modern cultivars are not grown. The status of certain other accessions is ambiguous, because the passport data are limited. Seven of 49 such ambiguous accessions from Greece and five of 16 such accessions from Bulgaria were resistant to CB. This frequency of resistance is significantly higher (P < 0.01) than that found within the remainder of the 2167 common wheat accessions in the NSGC that have limited passport data (n = 2167, 1.9% resistant). Based on these observations and on the geographic distribution of resistant landrace accessions, we hypothesize that Bulgaria and northeastern Greece are likely within the center of concentration for CB resistance. The European Wheat Database lists 162 landraces of common wheat from Bulgaria and 137 from Greece (Faberova et al., 2005), and additional sources of CB resistance might be present among these accessions.


Figure 1
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Specific geographic locations where CB resistant and susceptible wheat landrace accessions were collected: A) pattern of occurrence from Europe through Eastern Asia and B) number of resistant accessions and frequency of resistance per 100 km by 100 km grid cell in the four country region where the most resistant accessions were found.

 
Over the four-country center of concentration for CB resistance the frequency of resistant accessions was approximately 11% and within this center there are regions where the frequency of CB resistant accessions is much higher than the average. In Iran the frequency of CB resistance among accessions originating from Bakhtaran province is 40.8% (n = 341) (Fig. 1B) and the adjacent province of Hamadan also has a high frequency of CB resistant accessions (25%, n = 100). In fact, there appears to be a gradient of CB resistant accessions centering on Bakhtaran province with lower frequency as distance from the province increased (Fig. 1B). In Turkey and Macedonia there do not appear to be any subcenters of concentration such as Bakhtaran in Iran. However, in Serbia and Montenegro, the province of Kosovo had a high frequency of CB resistant accessions (36%, n = 100) (Fig. 1B), and in one locality in the south of the province 15 of 19 accessions collected from three specific locations within approximately 16 km of one another were resistant.

Dwarf Bunt Resistance
Resistance to DB occurs in the same general area as CB resistance (Fig. 2A), but DB resistance is less common. Two centers of concentration for DB resistance are apparent, one in Serbia and Montenegro and the other in eastern Turkey and Iran (Fig. 2B). The highest frequency of DB resistance occurred among accessions from the province of Hakkari in southeastern Turkey where 58% of the 48 accessions tested were resistant. Resistant accessions from Hakkari represent 76% (28 of 37) of the resistant accessions identified from Turkey. DB resistance in accessions from eastern Turkey is known to bunt researchers (Bruehl, 1990), but neither the high frequency of resistance within accessions from Hakkari province nor the occurrence of DB resistance in accessions from Iran and Serbia and Montenegro has been described previously.


Figure 2
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Specific geographic locations where DB resistant and susceptible wheat landrace accessions were collected: A) pattern of occurrence from Europe through Eastern Asia and B) number of resistant accessions and frequency of resistance per 100 km by 100 km grid cell in the four country region where the most resistant accessions were found.

 
Of 132 landrace accessions from Hakkari present in the NSGC, 85 have either spring or facultative growth habit. Few of these accessions were tested for DB resistance, yet some were reported to be DB resistant by others (Bruehl, 1990). Currently, DB data are available for five accessions from Hakkari classified as spring habit and of these four were resistant. Thus, it is likely that more DB resistant accessions could be identified from Turkey within the materials classified as spring and facultative habit and these will be tested in the future.

Within Turkey, data from the WorldClim database showed the mean precipitation for the coldest quarter of the year was 237 mm for the locations where DB resistant accessions originated compared to 155 mm for locations where susceptible accessions originated. Similarly, DB resistance was related to elevation of origin of the accession. Across the three countries where DB resistance was found, elevation at origin was available for 3958 accessions. Within this sample the frequency of DB resistance is significantly lower (1.5 vs. 2.9%, P < 0.05) for accessions from less than 1250 m than for accessions from higher elevations. These differences in precipitation and elevation are likely correlated with long-lasting snow cover that is required for infection by the DB pathogen (Goates, 1996).

Relationship to Awn, Glume, and Kernel Pigmentation
In both sets of data examined the occurrence of lightly pigmented kernels was positively associated with the occurrence of CB resistance, whereas lightly pigmented awn and glumes were associated with CB susceptibility (Table 3). The positive association between lightly pigmented kernels and CB resistance in the NSGC data was not due to accessions with white/amber kernels being overrepresented and accessions with more darkly pigmented kernels being underrepresented in the four countries that had the high frequency of CB resistance. For example, within Turkey, Serbia and Montenegro, and Macedonia 1375 accessions were classified with respect to kernel color and among these there was a negative association between resistance and red kernels (P = 10–6) and a positive association between resistance and white/amber kernels (P = 10–6). There was a weak, but significant (P < 0.01), association of dark kernel color with DB resistance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Associations and the frequencies of accessions with lightly pigmented awns, glumes, and kernels with the frequency of common bunt resistance in landrace accessions of Triticum aestivum subsp. aestivum from the USDA National Small Grains Collection (NSGC) in two data sets.{dagger}

 
Phenotypic Diversity within and among Accessions from Subcenters of Resistance
The subcenters where the frequency of resistant accessions was exceptionally high, such as Hakkari province in Turkey for DB and Bakhtaran province in Iran for CB, could be due to the consequence of highly disease-conducive environments resulting in farmer-selection for resistant landraces over time, or stochastically, because of recurrent mutations for resistance that remained in the landrace populations (Qualset, 1975). For these two locations we examined the phenotypic diversity among the resistant accessions using data from the NSGC for Hakkari and from the 1991 UC Davis trial for Bakhtaran.

Many of the resistant accessions from Hakkari were collected by C. Sperling, H. Gecit, and D. Eser in the mid 1980s and a few were collected by J. Harlan in 1948 and by J. Hoffmann, M. Kanbertay, R.J. Metzger, and H. Sencer in 1979. Little morphoagronomic data are available for the resistant accessions, but based on the seed and spike images available in GRIN it is clear that the materials are morphologically diverse. Furthermore, there appears to be diversity within the accessions as expected for landraces. The NSGC has attempted to maintain the diversity within landraces, but population size bottlenecks have rendered many of them as uniform as single-plant derivatives. Some marketplace grain collections, such as those collected from Hakkari province, show diversity within the NSGC accessions. For example, seven DB resistant genotypes were selected from within PI 560603 which are morphologically diverse with respect to spike type, glume and kernel color. These selections were recently given new PI designations (PI 636145–PI 636151), as were several other resistant accessions selected from Hakkari collections. The environmental conditions in the southeastern Turkey province of Hakkari are probably highly conducive to the DB disease, resulting in farmer-selection of disease resistant landraces over time.

The variability in quantitative traits among CB-resistant accessions from the Bakhtaran province, Iran, was lower than the variability among CB-susceptible accessions for six of the nine traits assessed (Table 4). Similarly, for the quantitative traits except spike and awn length, the resistant accessions from Bakhtaran were significantly less variable than the other common wheat accessions tested in the 1991 Davis planting. The differences in variance were small, but as expected if the resistant Bakhtaran accessions were derived from the same or closely related landraces. The high frequency of resistant accessions from this area may be the result of selection pressure for resistance induced in highly disease-conducive environments. Genes and phenotypes occurring at high frequencies would have been taken by collectors repeatedly by chance because the CB disease will not be apparent in most instances of field, farm stores, or market sources. Investigations with molecular markers (Driesigaker et al., 2004, 2005) may shed light on this unusual observation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Mean (x), variance (s2), coefficient of variation (cv), and ratio of variances (F-value) for quantitative traits in 106 accessions resistant to common bunt from Bakhtaran province, Iran compared to 142 susceptible accessions from the same province and to 1858 other accessions from Iran.

 
In summary, we have identified geographic centers of concentration for both CB and DB in common wheat landrace accessions from the NSGC and have found that lightly pigmented kernels are associated with CB resistance. In addition, geographic subcenters of concentration were revealed in Kosovo province in Serbia and Montenegro and in Bakhtaran province in Iran for CB resistance, and in Hakkari province in Turkey for DB resistance. This information will be useful in guiding further exploration for sources of genes for bunt resistance and for the study of resistance gene diversity within the centers. Such information can also be used to target further collection efforts aimed at finding new resistance gene sources for these two diseases. Based on the analysis of variability of accessions from Bakhtaran province, where CB resistance was exceptionally frequent, genetic analyses would be useful to determine if these accessions were mono- or polymorphic for specific CB resistance genes.
Supplemental Table 1. Accesssions of Triticum aestivum var. aestivum from the National Small Grains Collection resistant to common bunt disease. Only data for the landrace accessions were included in the analysis presented in the paper.

Accession Prefix

Accession number

Name

Status

Origin

CItr 4306 8 LANDRACE Iran
CItr 7368 G 334 BREEDING United States
CItr 11432 A-2–59–14 BREEDING United States
CItr 11438 27461C-2–6-1 BREEDING United States
CItr 11471 2421–7.19.32 BREEDING United States
CItr 11473 McFadden 1280 BREEDING United States
CItr 11491 White Russian CULTIVATED China
CItr 11532 G2343-A-4–28 BREEDING United States
CItr 11543 Utah Q231–17 BREEDING United States
CItr 11576 TURKEY SELECTION BREEDING United States
CItr 11617 BREEDING United States
CItr 11635 RENOWN CULTIVAR Canada
CItr 11650 RL 716 BREEDING Canada
CItr 11713 Ns. 2594 BREEDING United States
CItr 11721 RL 1114 BREEDING Canada
CItr 11723 N 1264 BREEDING United States
CItr 11775 Ns. 2590 BREEDING United States
CItr 11779 Ns. 2687 BREEDING United States
CItr 11786 N 1250 BREEDING United States
CItr 11787 N 1249 BREEDING United States
CItr 11789 II-28–16 BREEDING United States
CItr 11790 II-28–68 BREEDING United States
CItr 11869 REGENT CULTIVAR Canada
CItr 11871 II-28–102 BREEDING United States
CItr 11882 N 1349 BREEDING United States
CItr 11884 N 1330 BREEDING United States
CItr 11885 N 1098–28 BREEDING United States
CItr 11891 II-29–53 BREEDING United States
CItr 11892 II-28–27 BREEDING United States
CItr 11898 II-29–60 BREEDING United States
CItr 11931 N 1466 BREEDING United States
CItr 11937 GREAT NORTHERN CULTIVAR Canada
CItr 11940 PREMIER CULTIVAR United States
CItr 11968 Nebr. Sel. 363452 BREEDING United States
CItr 12005 Ns. No. 2747 BREEDING United States
CItr 12006 Ns. 2800 BREEDING United States
CItr 12012 RL 1333 BREEDING Canada
CItr 12040 II-29–57 BREEDING United States
CItr 12042 I-38–3 BREEDING United States
CItr 12056 N 1637 BREEDING United States
CItr 12058 SD 1463–26 BREEDING United States
CItr 12187 KENYA 117C CULTIVAR Kenya
CItr 12309 II-36–13 BREEDING United States
CItr 12317 N 1753 BREEDING United States
CItr 12318 NEWTHATCH CULTIVAR United States
CItr 12324 N 1769 BREEDING United States
CItr 12354 N 1609 BREEDING United States
CItr 12358 Ns. 3111 BREEDING United States
CItr 12360 Ns. 3096 BREEDING United States
CItr 12367 N 1535 BREEDING United States
CItr 12431 N. 1840 BREEDING United States
CItr 12432 II-38–19 BREEDING United States
CItr 12433 II-38–14 BREEDING United States
CItr 12437 Ns. 3129 BREEDING United States
CItr 12492 N 2035 BREEDING United States
CItr 12493 N 2012 BREEDING United States
CItr 12521 Huntley 4a BREEDING United States
CItr 12542 N 1843–41 BREEDING United States
CItr 12547 II-39–57 BREEDING United States
CItr 12548 N 3264 BREEDING United States
CItr 12549 N 2092 BREEDING United States
CItr 12634 II-42–22 BREEDING United States
CItr 12637 N 2232 BREEDING United States
CItr 12642 Ns. 3269 BREEDING United States
CItr 12643 Ns. 3274 BREEDING United States
CItr 12644 Ns. 3282 BREEDING United States
CItr 12645 Ns. 3284 BREEDING United States
CItr 12680 BUNT RES ELGIN 1 BREEDING United States
CItr 12724 Kansas No. 47B121 BREEDING United States
CItr 12732 1416 A-1–8-3–2 BREEDING United States
CItr 12735 1416 A-1–2-3–2 BREEDING United States
CItr 12737 1465 A-1–5-4–1 BREEDING United States
CItr 12738 1464 A-1–24–1-1 BREEDING United States
CItr 12741 Ns. 3291 BREEDING United States
CItr 12742 Ns. 3684 BREEDING United States
CItr 12746 N. 1924.44 BREEDING United States
CItr 12785 N. 2223 BREEDING United States
CItr 12786 Ns. 3679 BREEDING United States
CItr 12822 III-47–36 BREEDING United States
CItr 12839 RL 2632 BREEDING Canada
CItr 12849 RL 2667 BREEDING Canada
CItr 12850 RL 2709 BREEDING Canada
CItr 12851 Kansas No. 462666 BREEDING United States
CItr 12852 Kansas No. 44767 BREEDING United States
CItr 12853 Kansas No. 431413 BREEDING United States
CItr 12867 Colo. F.C. 1197 BREEDING United States
CItr 13043 Ns. 3880.227 BREEDING United States
CItr 13092 II-40–107 BREEDING United States
CItr 13100 SELKIRK CULTIVAR Canada
CItr 13152 Ns. 3880.127 BREEDING United States
CItr 13199 SD Sel. 56–45 BREEDING United States
CItr 13266 AWNED ELGIN 2 BREEDING United States
CItr 13332 PEMBINA CULTIVAR Canada
CItr 13451 ND 152 BREEDING United States
CItr 13691 Sel. 18–5 BREEDING United States
CItr 13729 LUFT CULTIVAR United States
CItr 13738 Sel. 6 BREEDING United States
CItr 13824 II-58–14 BREEDING United States
CItr 13837 Sel. C61–9 BREEDING United States
CItr 13958 WALDRON CULTIVAR United States
CItr 14107 SNOW MOLD TOLERANT SELECTION 2 BREEDING United States
CItr 14127 NORDMAN CULTIVAR United States
CItr 14128 PLAINSMAN CULTIVAR United States
CItr 14267 DT 183 BREEDING Canada
CItr 14275 Q 2331–34 BREEDING Canada
CItr 14290 LA 1491 BREEDING Mexico
CItr 15001 57–349 LANDRACE Nepal
CItr 17576 6720–10 BREEDING United States
CItr 17725 GREER CULTIVAR United States
CItr 17730 ID 77–53–23-B BREEDING United States
CItr 17731 ID 75–53–7 BREEDING United States
CItr 17734 ID 75–55–19 BREEDING United States
CItr 17755 RL 6043 BREEDING Canada
CItr 17838 ID 72–5059 BREEDING United States
CItr 17841 ID 74–53/18 BREEDING United States
CItr 17842 ID 77–53/23-B BREEDING United States
PI 8818 Koola LANDRACE Iraq
PI 40946 Type No. 8A LANDRACE Pakistan
PI 40956 Graecum LANDRACE Pakistan
PI 41020 Kizil Bogara LANDRACE Uzbekistan
PI 68096 BELOKOLOSKA CULTIVAR Russian Federation
PI 68176 CItr 8523 CULTIVATED Russian Federation
PI 71106 BELOKOLOSKA CULTIVAR Russian Federation
PI 74084 BELOKOLOSKA CULTIVAR Russian Federation
PI 74492 CItr 9319 BREEDING Russian Federation
PI 78814 CItr 10112 LANDRACE Georgia
PI 94359 52ASW LANDRACE Ukraine
PI 94364 59BSW LANDRACE Armenia
PI 94593 573 LANDRACE Russian Federation
PI 106163 G 1–6-0 BREEDING Australia
PI 106177 G 1–0 BREEDING Australia
PI 106197 G 316–0-0 BREEDING Australia
PI 106208 G 240–85–0 BREEDING Australia
PI 106210 G 271–1-2 BREEDING Australia
PI 106217 BREEDING Australia
PI 117727 2716 BREEDING Australia
PI 117762 2716 BREEDING Australia
PI 124900 E-29-G-3-LO BREEDING Australia
PI 131276 C 10535 BREEDING Australia
PI 131376 BREEDING Australia
PI 131384 C 10534 BREEDING Australia
PI 131391 0–7-4–0 BREEDING Australia
PI 131393 0–19–4-0 BREEDING Australia
PI 133291 EUREKA 2 CULTIVAR Australia
PI 133292 EUREKA CULTIVAR Australia
PI 133293 3781 BREEDING Australia
PI 133299 9010 BREEDING Australia
PI 142222 QUADRAT CULTIVAR Australia
PI 142379 364–5G-40 BREEDING Australia
PI 142380 366–7-G-40 BREEDING Australia
PI 142381 388–9-G-40 BREEDING Australia
PI 142382 393–4-G-40 BREEDING Australia
PI 142397 755-G-40 BREEDING Australia
PI 164362 Kanak LANDRACE India
PI 165141 Sivas LANDRACE Turkey
PI 165163 Yumusak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 165175 Ak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166219 Ak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166252 Yumusak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166258 Haci Yusuf LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166260 Germir LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166261 Zerun LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166267 Zerin LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166278 Guzluk Yillik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166282 Zeran LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166283 Yillik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166293 Erik Kislik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166296 Saritopbas LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166299 Ak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166310 Yumusak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166477 Cakirli LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166481 Sumdar LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166494 Ak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166562 Yumusak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166622 Sari Bursa LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166703 Kurt LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166748 Yazlik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 166927 Sam LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167508 2141 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167551 2721 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167694 3888 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167712 3944 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167731 3988 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167772 4091 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167773 4093 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167780 4104 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167814 4197 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167817 4204 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167818 4208 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167824 4219 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167857 4298 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 167868 4318 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 168486 9368a LANDRACE India
PI 170996 6615 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171006 3918 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171007 3920 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171018 3935 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171023 4066 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171029 4076 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171033 4109 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 171052 4263 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 172201 186 BREEDING Australia
PI 172533 7698 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 172534 Kirik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 172554 8355 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 172561 Sertak LANDRACE Turkey
PI 172565 Menceki LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173384 6517 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173388 6535 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173395 6627 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173399 Sumeder Cakerlisi LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173444 Kirik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173450 Kirik LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173471 Kose LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173474 Kose LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173477 8032 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 173478 8038 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 177977 184/2 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178000 165/5 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178007 193/2 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178101 Rus LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178172 141/3 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178175 144/10 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178182 7607 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178193 8818 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178194 8820 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178206 Saribas LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178210 YAYLA 305 CULTIVAR Turkey
PI 178224 10227 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178687 Dimcuit LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178689 184/5 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178692 182/3 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178694 146/6 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178695 145/2 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178697 140/3 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178705 175/2 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178713 142/5 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178723 142/6 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178726 193/5 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178737 165/6 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178748 6499 BREEDING Turkey
PI 178750 9735 LANDRACE Syria
PI 178767 62/2 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178776 YAYLA 305 CULTIVAR Turkey
PI 178777 73/1 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178784 Ruto LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178793 Beleke LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178801 10325 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 178804 10341 LANDRACE Turkey
PI 180636 Strain No. 3524/38 BREEDING Germany
PI 180638 Strain No. 1179/42 BREEDING Germany
PI 181256 14 LANDRACE Afghanistan
PI 185275 H912 SEL 47 933 BREEDING Argentina
PI 185298 H 1092 47–683 BREEDING Argentina
PI 185867 II-116–2C-5C-(1–3C)-16C BREEDING Mexico
PI 189780 BLE DUR D 115 BREEDING Tunisia
PI 189786 Sel. 49–4796 H544 BREEDING Argentina
PI 189804 Sel. 49–4809 H653 BREEDING Argentina
PI 189821 Sel. 49–4831 H1035 BREEDING Argentina
PI 189840 Sel. 49–2854 H1168 BREEDING Argentina
PI 190154 HOHENHEIMER BASTARD CULTIVAR Germany
PI 190490 ELLA CULTIVAR Sweden
PI 191122 Jeja de Barcelona LANDRACE Spain
PI 191135 Marceno de Lerida LANDRACE Spain
PI 191363 Russie 062 CULTIVATED Italy
PI 191391 Tricoccum CULTIVATED Ethiopia
PI 191496 H 2 B 13326 CULTIVATED Portugal
PI 191559 H 15 N 13356 CULTIVATED Portugal
PI 191584 HNAD 12228 CULTIVATED Portugal
PI 191706 Bladette de Besplas LANDRACE France
PI 191872 Arrancada CULTIVATED Portugal
PI 192249 Bohom Vaxelv Seleta CULTIVATED Czech Republic
PI 192393 SELECTY PRESIVKA CULTIVAR Czechoslovakia
PI 192433 Egipcio CULTIVATED Portugal
PI 192569 Forma Vinda de Varmland LANDRACE Sweden
PI 192576 BON FERMIER CULTIVAR France
PI 202786 BREEDING Peru
PI 204035 Santa Marta LANDRACE Portugal
PI 211645 220–39 CULTIVATED Turkey
PI 211667 1467 CULTIVATED Turkey
PI 212820 1 CULTIVATED Uruguay
PI 213570 AQUILA CULTIVAR Italy
PI 213572 Gzal. Mitre CULTIVATED Argentina
PI 213582 D.I.V. 6703 BREEDING Argentina
PI 213591 D.I.V. 6712 BREEDING Argentina
PI 213594 D.I.V. 6715 BREEDING Argentina
PI 213602 D.I.V. 6723 BREEDING Argentina
PI 213682 BUCK 62/52 BREEDING Argentina
PI 220433 Line 1167–68 BREEDING