Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 February 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:996-998 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balint-Kurti, P.J.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Balint-Kurti, P.J.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M.M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Balint-Kurti, P.J.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M.M.

REGISTRATIONS OF GERMPLASMS

Registration of 20 GEM Maize Breeding Germplasm Lines Adapted to the Southern USA

P.J. Balint-Kurtia,*, M. Blancob, M. Millardc, S. Duvickb, J. Hollanda, M. Clementsd, R. Holleye, M.L. Carsonf and M.M. Goodmang

a USDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C. 27695-7616
b USDA-ARS, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
c North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station (NC7), USDA-ARS & Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
d USDA-ARS Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS, 39762
e Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Henderson, KY 42420 (present address, Pioneer Hibred, DuPont Agriculture and Nutrition, RR1, Box 90a, Princeton IN 47670)
f USDA-ARS Cereal Disease Lab, Univ. of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108
g Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695

* Author for correspondence (peter_balintkurti{at}ncsu.edu)

Twenty maize (Zea mays L.) breeding germplasm lines have been developed cooperatively by the USDA GEM (Germplasm Enhancement of Maize) project (Reg no. GP-407 to GP-426, PI 639037 to PI 639056). The GEM project is a cooperative research effort to facilitate the introduction of exotic maize germplasm into U.S. breeding programs. It involves most of the larger private U.S. maize breeding companies and many public cooperators (Salhuana et al., 1994; Pollak and Salhuana, 2001; Goodman, 1999; Goodman and Carson, 2000; Goodman et al., 2000). Replicated breeding trials coordinated by North Carolina State University as part of the GEM project, and conducted by several public and private maize breeding programs, have identified 20 superior F2S2 germplasm lines containing 50% tropical germplasm by pedigree (Table 1). When topcrossed to sister-line crosses or foundation-seed inbreds, these germplasm lines yielded well in North Carolina and other southern corn growing regions of the United States in comparison to commercial check hybrids.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 The GEM ID numbers and PI numbers of the 20 germplasm lines registered with their corresponding original identifiers. Yield and moisture data are shown from yield trials conducted in 2001 and 2002 with topcross seed produced using LH185Bt as the tester. GEMS-0023, -0030, and -0031 were not included in this yield trial but yielded well in other associated trials.

 
The sources of the tropical germplasm involved in these germplasm lines include hybrids from Brazil (DKXL370A and DKXL380), Mexico (DKB830), and Thailand (DK212T and DK888). These hybrids were contributed to the GEM project by Bruce Maunder (retired vice-president of Dekalb Agricultural Research). The U.S. parents were privately owned inbred lines of the stiff stalk heterotic group. Germplasm lines were developed by selfing and selecting variable F1s from tropical source x U.S. inbred crosses in North Carolina under standard nursery conditions, followed by a second selfing–selection season in Homestead, FL (F2S1), and a third selfing–selection season in a selection nursery in Raleigh (F2S2). All procedures were performed using ear-to-row methods, except that F2 seeds planted in Homestead were bulked by pedigree (i.e., all the F2 seed from each tropical source x U.S. inbred were bulked). Germplasm lines were visually selected on the basis of resistance to a mixture of foliar diseases, resistance to Fusarium ear rot [caused by Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg (synonym F. moniliforme Sheldon) (teleomorph: Gibberella moniliformis) and F. proliferatum (Matsushima) Nirenberg (teleomorph: G. intermedia)], resistance to anthracnose stalk rot (caused by Colletotrichum graminicola G.W. Wils), resistance to lodging, early flowering, synchrony of silk and pollen production, and reduced plant and ear height.

All diseases were artificially inoculated. Foliar diseases were inoculated by sprinkling dry inoculum for a mixture of diseases {southern and northern leaf blight [caused by Bipolaris maydis (Nisikado & Miyake) Shoemaker = Helminthosporium maydis Nisikado & Miyake and Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) K. J. Leonard & E. G. Suggs = Helminthosporium turcicum Pass., respectively], anthracnose leaf blight (caused by Colletotrichum graminicola), gray leaf spot (caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & E.Y. Daniels)} into the whorl at about 7 wk after planting. Ear and stalk rots were inoculated mechanically by puncturing the ear and stem respectively with toothpicks and needles, respectively, bearing inoculum. Foliar and plant diseases were rated at least twice during each season on an individual plant basis. Additionally, plot ratings were taken for foliar disease approximately 3 wk after pollinations ended. Foliar disease was rated on a one to nine scale with nine being no symptoms and one being dead. Plants rated four or below were discarded. Plants that were killed by stalk rot were discarded. Ear rot was rated at the time of harvest. Ears that had significant amounts of visible rot were discarded.

Topcross seed for initial yield trials was produced using LH185 and the sister line cross FR697 x FR615 as testers. The released germplasm lines were among the top performers out of approximately 2000 germplasm lines tested, based on data from a minimum of 15 test locations from Delaware to Georgia and as far west as Missouri over 2 yr (1997 and 1998). In these tests, seed moisture was comparable to, or lower than, the commercial hybrid check means in all cases and lodging was similar to that of the hybrid checks for all the germplasm lines. The top yielding germplasm lines in the initial trials using LH185 as tester were GEMS-0012 and GEMS-0019, which yielded 10 167 kg ha–1 and 10 262 kg ha–1, respectively, compared to a check mean of several elite commercial hybrids of 9357 kg ha–1 (the yields of the individual checks were: DK683, 9816 kg ha–1; DK689, 9442 kg ha–1; DK714, 9863 kg ha–1; DK743, 10 370 kg ha–1; LH132 x LH51, 8687 kg ha–1; P3165, 9552 kg ha–1; P32K61, 9957 kg ha–1).

Additional yield experiments, at several locations throughout the southern corn belt in 2001 and 2002 with topcross seed produced using LH287 and LH185Bt as testers, provided head-to-head comparisons across several Lancaster-type testers and confirmed that these germplasm lines performed well compared to elite hybrid checks, in most cases out-yielding the checks (Goodman 2002; also see the GEM website, www.public.iastate.edu/~usda-gem/Yield_Trial_Data/Year_2002/Year_2002_NC/Pubwin.txt, verified 27 Nov. 2005). In these trials GEMS-0012 was again the top yielding germplasm line. With LH287 as tester, it yielded 10 861 kg ha–1, compared to the check mean of 9390 kg ha–1 [The top yielding check, LH200 x LH62, yielded 10 266 kg ha–1. Other checks were DK687, 9519 kg ha–1; LH132 x LH51, 8907 kg ha–1; NC320 x (LH132 x LH51), 9772 kg ha–1; P30F33, 6976 kg ha–1; P3165, 9389 kg ha–1; and P32K61, 9473 kg ha–1]. Table 1 shows the results of the trials conducted using LH185Bt as tester.

In yield trials performed in the midwestern corn belt (Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois) using LH283 and LH185 as testers, the yields of all of these germplasm lines were inferior to the elite hybrid check means. GEMS-0018, GEMS-0015, GEMS-0009, and GEMS-0021 yielded the best of these germplasm lines in top crosses with LH185. GEMS-0018, GEMS-0013, and GEMS-0009 yielded best in topcrosses with LH283. In these tests, lodging for several germplasm lines was somewhat greater than the hybrid checks (see experiments 03609 and 036010 at www.public.iastate.edu/~usda-gem/Yield_Trial_Data/Year_2003/YT_2003.html; verified 1 Dec. 2005).

The germplasm lines have a range of kernel colors; orange and yellow (GEMS-0006 and GEMS-0020), orange (GEMS-0010, GEMS-0012, GEMS-0013, GEMS-0018, and GEMS-0031), yellow and white (GEMS-0024), and yellow (all others). A range of kernel textures is also found; semiflint to semident (GEMS-0030, GEMS-0005 GEMS-0009, GEMS-0011, GEMS-0010, GEMS-0006, GEMS-0017, and GEMS-0013), semiflint (GEMS-0019 and GEMS-0023) and semident (all others). These data can be found by querying the database found on the GRIN website (www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/acc/acc_queries.html; verified 27 Nov. 2005).

Flowering of germplasm lines per se occurred between 3 and 24 d later than B73 in Ames, IA, in 2003. Flowering time observations made in 2002 were highly correlated with the 2003 flowering data, but with a smaller range of between 2 and 15 d later than B73. The earliest flowering were GEMS-0029 and GEMS-0010 (4 and 5 d later than B73 in 2003; 2 and 3 d later in 2002). In Clayton, NC, in 1999, flowering times for the GEM germplasm lines were 1 to 14 d later than B73 with GEMS-0009, -0010, -0018, and -0021 all flowering within 1 or 2 d of B73.

Preliminary observations were made regarding resistance to a number of diseases: Per se germplasm lines were artificially inoculated in 2003 and 2004 in Mississippi with 3.4 mL of an Aspergillus flavus Link:Fr. spore suspension (106 spores mL–1) injected through the husk of the ear, 1 wk after midsilk. GEMS-0028 and GEMS-0030 showed good resistance to Aspergillus ear rot and aflatoxin accumulation relative to two resistant checks, Mp313E and Tuxpan. Both GEM germplasm lines were up to 1 wk earlier than the checks and are therefore promising sources for future breeding efforts for aflatoxin resistance. GEMS-0021 was inoculated with a spore suspension of Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg (synonym F. moniliforme Sheldon) (teleomorph: Gibberella moniliformis) and F. proliferatum (Matsushima) Nirenberg (teleomorph: G. intermedia) injected down the silk channel in Clayton, NC, in 2003. It showed relatively good ear rot resistance (1.3% kernels rotted compared to the mean for the field of 6.35%) and resistance to fumonisin accumulation (4 mg kg–1 compared to 6.6 mg kg–1). This was the only family tested for fumonisin resistance. Gray leaf spot trails were performed in Andrews, NC, Laurel Springs, NC, and Marion, NC, in 2000, relying on natural inoculation at Andrews and using dry inoculum sprinkled into the whorl at 7 wk after planting in Marion and Laurel Springs. Several ratings were taken through the season using a one to nine scale (see above). In hybrids with FR697 x FR615, several germplasm lines matched DK683 (a highly resistant commercial hybrid) for gray leaf spot resistance. GEMS-0020 was most resistant, with GEMS-0015 and GEMS-0018 showing some resistance. Regarding family per se performance, GEMS-0019 was the most gray leaf spot resistant, followed by GEMS-0024 and GEMS-0030. GEMS-0020 and GEMS-0028 performed acceptably, but only GEMS-0019 was as resistant as NC258, the resistant inbred check. All diseases were rated in trials with two replications for each year reported except for the aflatoxin study, which had three replications per year.

These germplasm lines provide a unique source of tropical x temperate maize germplasm for the development of lines with improved yield and potential disease resistance. They have particular utility for developing lines adapted to conditions in the southern USA. Bulked F2S2:3 or F2S2:4 seed is available from the North Central Plant Introduction Station, USDA-ARS, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011. These materials are released without restrictions of any kind.

NOTES

Registration by CSSA.

Accepted for publication September 30, 2005.

REFERENCES





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balint-Kurti, P.J.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Balint-Kurti, P.J.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M.M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Balint-Kurti, P.J.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M.M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome