Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1

Figure 1


Fig. 1. Depiction of intervals on linkage group (LG) I that were (1) segregating (shaded with vertical markings), (2) contained a crossover (shaded with cross markings), or (3) were fixed for A81–356022 (no shading), the recurrent parent, for each of the Set 1 (A) and Set 2 (B) populations. Marker order (left) and map distances in centimorgans (right) are based on a linkage analysis across the three Set 1 populations. AAC32, ACG9a, and ACG9b are amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, and all others are simple sequence repeat markers. Shown below the linkage maps are the mean differences between lines in each population that were homozygous for G. soja or G. max alleles at Satt239 or Satt496, which were the genetic markers with the largest or nearly the largest R2 value in each population. Positive allele values are used when the G. soja alleles had a positive numerical effect on the trait. Not significant and significant at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels are shown by NS, *, **, and ***, respectively.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome