Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:2668-2669 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J.N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J.N.

REGISTRATIONS OF GERMPLASMS

Registration of 14 Primitive Derived Cotton Germplasm Lines with Improved Fiber Strength

J.C. McCarty* and J.N. Jenkins

USDA-ARS, Crop Sci. Res. Lab., P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762

* Corresponding author (jmccarty{at}ars.usda.gov)

The ARS-USDA and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station released 14 primitive derived cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm lines (Reg. no. GP-822 through GP-835, PI 639148 through PI 639161) with improved fiber strength in 2004. These lines were derived from photoperiodic primitive race accessions that were converted to day-neutrality and selected for improved fiber strength. The germplasm release designation, registration number, and PI number of each line are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Fourteen cotton germplasm lines with improved fiber strength derived from crosses with primitive accessions.

 
The procedure for developing the germplasm lines is briefly described. Detailed information on their development and evaluation was reported by McCarty et al. (2003)(2004a, 2004b). The lines were derived from day-neutral selections from crosses of cultivars with day-length sensitive primitive race accessions (Percival, 1987). Crosses were made, the F1 generation was self-pollinated at the Cotton Winter Nursery, Tecoman, Colima, Mexico, and the F2 generation was grown in the field at Mississippi State, MS.

M75–1 was developed from a cross between ‘Deltapine 16’ (PI 529251, DPL16) and the primitive accession T75 (PI 549138) where day-neutral flowering habit was selected in the F2. This day-neutral selection was then backcrossed to T75. A single high fiber strength day-neutral plant was selected in the BC1F2. A single high strength plant was selected in the two succeeding generations.

M1388–1, M1388–2, and M1388–3 were developed from a cross between ‘DES56’ (PI 529520) (Bridge and Chism, 1978) and accession T1388 (PI 415112). A high fiber strength, day-neutral plant was selected in the F2 and F3. Three high strength plants were selected in the F4 from which M1388–1, M1388–2, and M1388–3 were derived.

M239–1 through M239–7 was developed from a cross between DPL16 and accession T239 (PI 163693) where day-neutral flowering habit was selected in the F2. This day-neutral selection was then backcrossed three times to T239, each time selecting for the day-neutral flowering habit in the F2 following each backcross. A high strength day-neutral plant was selected in the BC3F2. In the BC3F3, three high strength plants were selected. From progeny of these three plants, seven selections were made in the BC3F4 from which M239–1 through M239–7 were derived.

M237–1, M237–2, and M237–3 were developed from a cross between DPL16 and accession T237 (PI 163657) where day-neutral flowering habit was selected in the F2. This day-neutral selection was then backcrossed to T237. Two BC1F2, day-neutral, plants were selected for superior fiber length and strength. From these two plants, three BC1F3 plants were selected and from their progeny, three BC1F4 plants were selected from which M237–1, M237–2, and M237–3 were derived.

The F4–derived plant selections of all crosses were advanced to the F8 via bulk-self increase. The F8 generation was evaluated for yield, yield components, and fiber traits in 1998 through 2000 and compared to check cultivars Deltapine 50, DES 119, Stoneville 474, Deltapine 90, and SureGrow 125 in replicated tests at Mississippi State, MS. The germplasm lines generally had lower yield and lint percentage (range 28–32%) compared with check cultivars. Except for M75–1, M1388–2 and –3, and M237–2 boll weights were comparable to checks. Micronaire reading for M237–1, –2, and –3 was lower than checks while other germplasm lines were equal or higher than check cultivars. Percentage fiber elongation was lower than cultivars except for M75–1, which was equal to checks. Eight of the germplasm lines had fibers shorter than checks while only two, M237–2 and –3 had fibers longer than checks. Fiber strength measured by single instrument for the check cultivars ranged from 193 kN m kg–1 for Deltapine 50 to 219 kN m kg–1 for Deltapine 90. The strength for the germplasm lines ranged from 234 kN m kg–1 for M75–1 to 259 kN m kg–1 for M239–7. These lines represent diverse germplasm with fiber strength improved as much as 20% over check cultivars.

Small quantities of seed of these germplasm lines may be obtained from the corresponding author. Recipients of seed are asked to make appropriate recognition of the source of the germplasm if it is used in the development of a new cultivar, germplasm, parental line, or genetic stock.

NOTES

Contribution of the USDA-ARS in cooperation with the Mississippi Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn., Mississippi State, MS. Registration by CSSA.

Accepted for publication May 31, 2005.

REFERENCES





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J.N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J.N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome