Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. The relative performance of the Mapping Start Only (MSO) and three versions of the Mapping As You Go approach for nine general classes of genetic models (Table 1). E = the number of different environment types conditioning gene-by-environment interactions in the target population of environments, and K = level of epistasis. Additive genetic models: E = 1, K = 0; Epistatic effects models: E = 1, K = 1, 2; Gene-by-environment effects models: K = 0, E = 5, 10; Epistasis and gene-by-environment effects models: E = 5, 10, K = 1, 2. In all cases, performance is represented as the difference in response between a given breeding strategy and the MSO method. Positive values indicate the breeding strategy had a higher response than the MSO method, and negative values indicate the breeding strategy had a lower response than the MSO method. The performance differences are expressed in terms of normalized trait value.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome