Erratum
for
Guttieri et al., Crop Sci 44 (2) 418-424.
Published in Crop Sci. 44:1505 (2004).
© 2004 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
ERRATUM
Identification and Characterization of a Low Phytic Acid Wheat
Mary Guttieria,
David Bowena,
John A. Dorschb,
Victor Raboyc and
Edward Souzaa,*
a Univ. of Idaho, Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 870, Aberdeen, ID 83210
b BASF Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
c USDA-ARS Small Grains and Potato Research Unit, P.O. Box 607, Aberdeen, ID 83210
* Corresponding author (esouza{at}uidaho.edu)
In Crop Science 44(2):418–424, one of the bars of Fig. 2 is incorrect. The corrected Fig. 2 with its caption is printed below.
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Distribution of genotypes assigned to F2 plants from the cross Js-12-LPA/IDO563. F2 plants were classified into five categories: (1) Homozygous wild type if no progeny (F2:3) kernels were HIP and all F2:3 kernels with intermediate Pi concentrations had Pi concentrations below the mid-parent mean; (2) Heterozygous if at least one F2:3 kernel was HIP and at least one F2:3 kernel was wild type; (3) Heterozygous if HIP kernels were observed, no wild type F2:3 kernels were observed, and kernels of intermediate Pi concentration had concentrations below the mid-parent mean; (4) Homozygous for the low phytic acid trait if no F2:3 kernels were wild type and all F2:3 kernels with intermediate Pi concentrations had Pi concentrations above the mid-parent mean; (5) Homozygous for the low phytic acid trait if all F2:3 kernels were HIP.
|
|
