|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
b Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, 279 Plant Science Bldg., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
* Corresponding author (bmwardyn{at}iastate.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: BLUP, best linear unbiased predictor H, broad-sense heritability h2, narrow-sense heritability IHP, Illinois High Protein ILP, Illinois Low Protein P-Gr, phosphorus concentration in grain
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the basis of analyses at commercial laboratories in the USA and Canada, maize grain contains 0.32% P (National Research Council, 1996). Wet gluten feed, steep liquor, and wet distiller grains, which are by-products of wet- or dry-milling of maize that often are added to feedlot rations of beef cattle, have P concentrations that are at least two to four times as high as in whole grain (Milton, 2000). The National Research Council (1996) recommended a P intake by beef cattle of 0.20 to 0.30% P, assuming a daily feed intake of 9 to 11 kg. However, Erickson et al. (1999) found that the P requirement of finishing yearlings was 0.14% or less. Other feeding trials indicated that the National Research Council guidelines over-predicted by at least 25% the need of yearlings (Erickson et al., 2002) and of developing heifers (Call et al., 1978) for P.
Excess amounts of P that are ingested by cattle are excreted largely in the feces. When manure from feedlots is continually spread on adjacent cropland, levels of P in the soil often become much higher than needed for crop production. Runoff from soils that are high in P is a major cause of eutrophication in surface waters (Duda and Finan, 1983). Traditionally, application rates for cattle manure on cropland have been calculated by matching the nitrogen content of the manure to the nitrogen requirement of the intended crop, which often is maize. Maize plants use nitrogen and phosphorus in an 8:1 ratio; however, in cattle manure these elements typically are in a 4:1 ratio (White and Collins, 1982). The EPA (2002) now requires implementation of a site-specific nutrient management plan for all concentrated animal feeding operations. Regulatory changes that specify application rates of manure to cropland be based on existing soil nutrient levels and the nutrient needs of the intended crop are being proposed.
One remedy for reducing the potential of P pollution from beef cattle feedlots is to spread the manure over more hectares of cropland. This approach, however, adds costs. Another potential remedy is to reduce the P-Gr in maize to a level that more closely matches the dietary need of beef cattle for this element. Commercial maize breeders in the USA do not commonly use P-Gr as a selection criterion. Vyn and Tollenaar (1998) evaluated six commercial maize hybrids with release dates from 1959 to 1988. Although grain yield increased, P-Gr was unchanged. Two mutants of maize, lpa2-1 and lpa1-1, have been reported that reduce the phytate content in the grain by 50 to 60% (Ertl et al., 1998). However, these mutants do not affect P-Gr.
Little information is available on the inheritance of P-Gr. There is some evidence for genetic variation for this trait. Raboy et al. (1989) reported nearly a two-fold difference in P-Gr between the 83rd cycles of the divergently selected populations, IHP and ILP (Dudley and Lambert, 1992). Feil et al. (1992) found a significant difference in P-Gr between two tropical maize hybrids across multiple rates of application of N. In addition to sources of genetic variability, plant breeders use estimates of heritability and information on the relative magnitudes of genetic, genetic x environmental, and error variances to optimize allocation of resources in a field-based selection program. Obtaining estimates of these genetic parameters in a maize population known to be highly variable for P-Gr was the objective of this study.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The S1 families were evaluated for P-Gr in the same field on the campus of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 2000 and 2001, using a different area of the field each year. Inbreds B73, FR1064, and Mo17 were included as checks in 2001 only. The soil type was a Kennebec silt loam, and in both years the previous crop was soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Plots were watered as frequently as weekly from mid-June to late August to minimize visible drought stress. Soil P concentration was determined before planting in 2000 and 2001 by collecting and mixing 10 random soil samples from the plot area at a depth of 5 to 15 cm and then using the Bray-1 extraction method. Each year, 202 kg ha1 of N was applied approximately three weeks before planting in the form of anhydrous ammonia. Plot row length was 3.8 m. All plots were over-planted and then thinned to a final population of 55100 plants ha1 in 2000 and 51600 plants ha1 in 2001.
P-Gr Determination
Values of P-Gr were determined on grain samples obtained from hand-pollinated ears that were harvested shortly after physiological maturity (black-layer formation), dried at 32°C for a week, and then shelled by hand. Moldy kernels or kernels with insect damage were discarded. Also, any ears with less than 50 competitive kernels were not used. A composite grain sample was produced from each field plot by randomly sampling approximately 20 kernels from each of three to five sib-pollinated ears. Different plants were used as males and females, so a minimum of six plants per plot was sampled. For inbreds B73 and FR1064, multiple P-Gr determinations were made per plot in addition to the single determination from the composite grain sample. In each plot of these inbreds, two independent samples were obtained from each of two random ears produced by sib-mating. All grain samples were ground until 97% of the sample could pass through a 1.18-mm screen. Phosphorus analyses were conducted at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Soil and Plant Analytical Laboratory with a Tracor (Austin, TX, USA) Spectrace 5000 (energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence method).
Field Design and Statistical Analysis
In 2000, 180 S1 families were evaluated by an
design with 15 families per block, 12 blocks per replication, and two replications. In 2001, the same 180 S1 families and 20 additional S1 families were evaluated by a sets-in-replication design with 20 unique families and the three inbred checks per set and two replications. Because different field designs were used each year, an analysis of the 2001 data (checks included) was done first by PROC GLM (SAS Institute Inc., 1999) to obtain S1 family x replication least-squared means. This procedure adjusted for the set effects. These adjusted means, minus the checks, were then combined with the 2000 data in an across-years analysis to obtain estimates of the year variance
, the genetic variance among S1 families
, the family x year interaction variance
, and the residual variance
by the likelihood statistical methods of PROC MIXED (Littell et al., 1996). Also, the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) of the P-Gr value of each S1 family was calculated.
The residual variance from the analysis of S1 family plot values was equal to
![]() |
2e' = between-plot error variance,
w(env) = within-plot environmental variance,
2w
= within-plot genetic variance,
2s = sampling variance within ears, n = number of ears sampled per plot, and s = number of samples per ear.
Assuming inbreds B73 and FR1064 were completely homozygous, estimates of
2s and
2w
were obtained directly from analysis of the within-plot sampling of these inbreds because the value of
2w
was 0. In the analysis of the S1 families,
2w
equaled
2w
, which was not expected to equal 0. Assuming that the values of
2e',
2w
, and
2s were the same for the S1 families and the inbreds, then an estimate of
2w
was
![]() |
n' = 4.7, the average number of ears sampled per S1 family in this experiment and s' = 1.0, the number of samples per ear in this experiment. The significance of
2Y,
2F,
2FY,
2e' and
2w
was tested by the likelihood ratio statistic (Littell et al., 1996). The significance of the other estimates of variance components could not be tested with this statistic.
Broad-sense heritability (H) on a S1 family mean basis was estimated by the formula,
![]() |
y = number of years and r = number of replications per year. The denominator in this equation is an estimate of the phenotypic variance among S1 family means (
2P
). The values of
2P
, and of H
1, depend on the values of y, r, n, and s. Once estimates of the variance components for
2P
were obtained, then the effect of varying the values of y, r, n, and s on 
1 was determined.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the analysis of the S1 families, the year effect was significant (p < 0.05), whereas the family and family x year interaction were highly significant (p < 0.01) (Table 1). The year means of the 177 S1 families for which data were obtained in both years were 3.6 g kg1 in 2000 and 3.2 g kg1 in 2001. The relative values of these year means of P-Gr were consistent with the soil P readings; that is, the higher P-Gr mean was obtained in the year of the higher soil P reading.
|
|
2FY was highly significant, it was only 18% as large as the estimate of
2F. Of the 18 S1 families (10% of the 177 S1's evaluated both years) with the lowest 2-yr average values of P-Gr, 13 were in the top 10% in 2000 and a slightly different set of 13 were in the top 10% in 2001 (Table 2). Only one and two of these best 18 S1 families were not in the top 20% in 2000 and 2001, respectively. On the basis of 2-yr data and a 10% selection intensity, the selection differentials (the difference of the means of the selected families and of all families over both years) for selection based on 2000 results alone, 2001 results alone, and 2000 to 2001 combined results were 0.10, 0.09, and 0.10. Thus, the presence of family x year interaction caused the selection differential based on 1-yr data to be on average only 5% less than the selection differential based on 2-yr data.
|
2e' and
2w
were significantly greater than 0.0 (Table 1). The estimate of
2s was less than one-half the value of
2e' , whereas the estimate of
2w
was more than twice
2e'. The estimate of
2w
was 57.8 x 102 (g kg1)2. These variance estimates were obtained from 2001 data only, but the similarity of the estimates of
2e from each year [18.0 x 102 and 17.4 x 102 (g kg1)2 in 2000 and 2001, respectively] suggested that estimates obtained from combined data over both years would be similar.
The estimate of 
1 was 0.82, which provided a measure of the relative importance of genetic and environmental effects. In an intra-population selection program, such as recombining S1 families with the lowest P-Gr values, only additive genetic variance reflects useable genetic variance. Therefore, this estimate of broad-sense heritability overestimates the percentage of the selection differential that would be retained in a cycle of selection. Nonetheless, the closeness of 
1 to 1.0 certainly suggested that P-Gr could be easily modified in this population of S1 families by selection. The large value of this estimate is similar to estimates of narrow-sense heritability (h2) as high as 0.60 that have been reported for other kernel components in maize (Zehr et al., 1996). Also, the large value of 
1 was consistent with the finding of Wardyn (2001) that S0 genotypes that were rated as being either low or high for P-Gr based on analysis of grain from a single, self-pollinated ear, responded similarly when evaluated as S1 progenies in a subsequent year.
The total within-plot variance is the sum of
2w
,
2w
, and
2s. The greater the value of n, the less is the contribution of the within-plot variance to
2P
. For given values of y and r, the maximum value of 
1 occurs as n
. The estimates of the variance components of
2P
obtained in this research indicated that with y = 2 and r = 2 the maximum value of 
1 was 0.90. Over 90% of this maximum value (i.e., 
1 = 0.82) was realized with n = 4.7. Increasing n by a factor of two to 9.4 would have increased 
1 to only 0.86 (Fig. 2)
. In contrast, increasing n from 1 to 4.7, increased 
1 from 0.63 to 0.82. The greatest effect on 
1 of increasing n occurred when y = r = 1. Even in that situation, however, the effect of doubling n from 5 to 10 was an increase in 
1 from only 0.60 to 0.68. On a proportionality basis, the same effect of increasing n would occur for h2, because the denominator is the same for both 
1 and h2. Thus, these data suggested that little gain in efficiency of selection for P-Gr would be realized by sampling more than five, sib-pollinated ears per plot.
|

1, because y is a divisor for
2FY whereas r is not. At n = 5, the values of 
1 were 0.75 and 0.70 for y = 2, r = 1, and y = 1, r = 2, respectively. However, increasing y from 1 to 2 in a selection program would reduce expected gain per year by a half. Thus, these results suggested that in a selection program y = 1, r = 2 would be a better allocation of resources than y = 2, r = 1, even though the latter gave a higher value of 
1. The genotypic x location variance was not estimated in this research, but replacing replications with locations would be reasonable if the value of this variance was found to be greater than the value of
2e. All the sampled ears in this research were produced from hand-pollinations. This was done because the effect of pollen source on P-Gr was unknown. Because of the time and cost involved in making hand-pollinations, the effect of pollen source on P-Gr is an issue that should be investigated. Wardyn (2001) observed in a single-environment experiment that the effect of pollen source on P-Gr was minor. If this result is substantiated in additional environments, then grain from the same number of open-pollinated versus hand-pollinated ears could be used to determine P-Gr with little loss in selection gain. If, for example, the effect of the pollen source was 10%, then in a selection program with y = 1, r = 2 sampling 10 open-pollinated ears or five sib-pollinated ears would give approximately the same selection gain (Fig. 2).
In summary, the results of this research indicated that in the population developed from the cross of IHP and ILP that P-Gr is a highly heritable trait should be responsive to selection. Because P is an essential element for plant growth, there likely is a lower biological limit for P-Gr that is greater than 0.0. As this limit is approached, responsiveness to selection will decline. The genotype x year variance was highly significant, but comparing selection differentials obtained by selecting S1 families on the basis of 1- and 2-yr data indicated that single-year evaluations would yield good selection gains. Finally, a selection program with y = 1, r = 2 should provide more genetic gain per year than a selection program with y = 2, r = 1.
| NOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication March 9, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in Crop Science:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Lorenz, M. P. Scott, and K. R. Lamkey Genetic Variation and Breeding Potential of Phytate and Inorganic Phosphorus in a Maize Population Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Lorenz, M. P. Scott, and K. R. Lamkey Quantitative Determination of Phytate and Inorganic Phosphorus for Maize Breeding Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 600 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Guttieri, K. M. Peterson, and E. J. Souza Agronomic Performance of Low Phytic Acid Wheat Crop Sci., November 21, 2006; 46(6): 2623 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Feil, S. B. Moser, S. Jampatong, and P. Stamp Mineral Composition of the Grains of Tropical Maize Varieties as Affected by Pre-Anthesis Drought and Rate of Nitrogen Fertilization Crop Sci., January 31, 2005; 45(2): 516 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||