Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 4. Southern blotting analyses of oilseed rape cuphea-TE transgenic parental line TL6 and DH2 seedlings originating from eight DH1 plants by probing with the cuphea-TE transgene probe (a) followed by re-probing with the nptII gene probe (b) and schematic representation of the position of the probes in the T-DNA construct, not drawn to scale (c). The estimated sizes of the bands are shown in kilobase pair (kb). Lanes 1 to 8 represent the eight DH1 plants that were developed from crosses of the cuphea-TE transgenic parental line TL6 with nontransgenic plants and showed cuphea-TE expression by enhanced levels of palmitic acid (18.7–35.5% palmitic acid) in DH2 seed oil; P, a plasmid carrying the cuphea-TE transgene; CK, nontransgenic control plants. LB, left T-DNA border; RB, right T-DNA border; 35S, CaMV 35S promoter; tml, tml 3' region; nptII, neomycin phosphotransferase gene; napin 5', a seed specific promoter of the napin gene from B. rapa; napin 3', 3' termination fragment of the napin gene; cuphea-TE, the cuphea-TE transgene. Hatched bars represent the probes for the nptII gene and the cuphea-TE transgenes. The NsiI site is approximately 1.9 kb from RB and 5.9 kb from LB (Jones et al.., 1995; Kridl et al.., 1991; McBride and Summerfelt, 1990).





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome