Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 4. Calculated radiation use efficiency (RUE) versus observed RUE. Three approaches using the existing method of Hammer and Wright (1994) that scales from leaf photosynthesis to canopy RUE are compared. The first comparison (a, Approach 1) used the published functions in the Hammer and Wright (1994) that estimate carbon assimilation (CA) from light intensity, and uses the response for CAmax versus SLN taken from this study (Eq. [5]). The second comparison (b, Approach 2) used Eq. [9] for estimating CA from light intensity with the relationships of CAmax and CAdark to SLN being derived from the same data (Eq. [7] and [8]). The third comparison (c, Approach 3) is the same as the second approach but uses Eq. [5] instead of Eq. [7].





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome