Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. Relationship between kernel number per plant and plant growth rate during a 30-d period bracketing silking for maize hybrid Asgrow 777 growing with and without fertilization in three growing seasons with different water availability during the period bracketing silking (Exp. 5a, 5b, and 5c). Plants did not show prolificacy, so kernel number per plant was equal to kernel number per uppermost ear. Each point is the average of four replications. The control corresponds to fertilized treatments in the wettest year (Exp. 5b). Reduced N corresponds to non fertilized treatments in the wettest year (Exp. 5b). Reduced W corresponds to fertilized treatments in the years with lowest and intermediate available water (Exp. 5a and 5c). Reduced N and W corresponds to non fertilized treatments in the years with lowest and intermediate available water (Exp. 5a and 5c). Inverse equations were KNP = 667-705/PGR (R2 = 0.99, n = 4) for variable N at high water availability; KNP = 699-837/PGR (R2 = 0.92, n = 6) for variable available water in fertilized treatments and KNP = 699-862/PGR (R2 = 0.95, n = 6) for variable water and N supply. Standard error of the means varied from 0.11 to 0.26 g d-1 for PGR and from 15 to 16 kernels for KNP.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome