Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Raj, A.G.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Raj, A.G.B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Raj, A.G.B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Grain Crops
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Crop Science 41:705-711 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Population Diallel of Elite Medium- and Long-Duration Pearl Millet Composites

I. Populations and Their F1 Crosses

Adam Mohamed Alia, C.Tom Hash*b, Abu Elhassan S. Ibrahimc and A.G.Bhasker Rajb

a Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan
b Genetic Resources and Enhancement Program, ICRISAT, Patancheru, AP 502 324, India
c Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan

* Corresponding author (c.t.hash{at}cgiar.org)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] varieties grown in semiarid Africa and Asia have low grain yields. Information on heterosis and combining ability of diverse open-pollinated cultivars, breeding populations, and genepools is needed for efficient choice of breeding methods and parental materials to use in developing productive base populations for this crop. Data for grain and biomass yield, growth rate, time to flowering, plant height, panicle length, and productive tillers were collected from an 11-parent variety cross diallel of diverse pearl millet populations evaluated in five field environments in peninsular India. Data were summarized using the Gardner–Eberhart Analysis II. When genotype x environment interactions were significant, ranks of parental general combining abilities (GCA) were used to identify particular environments and parents contributing most to these interactions. Parental population effects were significant for all characters, as were differences in GCA. Populations NWC C2, AfPop 88, and LHGP consistently had the poorest ranks for general combining ability for grain yield across test environments. Populations ICMV 91059, SenPop, ICMP 91751, and ICMP 92951 constitute a genetically diverse subset of the parents that consistently had the best ranks for grain yield GCA across test environments. With ICMV 155 (crosses of which performed poorly in only one of five test environments), this latter group is a good source of more broad-based breeding populations for dual-purpose pearl millet improvement targeting peninsular India.

Abbreviations: CV, coefficients of variation • Cn, cycle n • GCA, general combining ability • G x E, genotype x environment • ICRISAT, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics • SCA, specific combining ability • TTF, time to flowering


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
PEARL MILLET is a robust, diploid, cross-pollinated grass with immense genetic diversity. It is grown as a subsistence grain and stover crop, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (Rachie and Majmudar, 1980; FAO/ICRISAT, 1996; Rai et al., 1999). It is one of six crops in the research mandate of the International Crops Research Institute of the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Its bisexual protogynous flowers, large seed numbers (up to 3000 per panicle), excellent tillering ability (four to six effective tillers per plant), and low seed rate make pearl millet amenable to genetic improvement by recurrent selection (Burton, 1983). A wide range of improved pearl millet populations have been developed by ICRISAT and national program plant breeders in Africa and Asia (Rai and Anand Kumar, 1994; Rattunde et al., 1997). This study was initiated to evaluate opportunities for merging several of these populations having medium-to-long duration (85 to 110 d to maturity in peninsular India) to provide a smaller, more manageable number of genetically broad, high-yielding base populations for future use in recurrent selection programs targeting dual-purpose pearl millet cultivars for traditional and nontraditional pearl millet production environments.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Genetic Materials
Eleven diverse, medium- and long-duration pearl millet populations (Table 1) were crossed in a diallel without reciprocals during the 1993 summer (dry) season at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. Parental populations having medium-to-long duration suited to peninsular-Indian conditions were selected on the basis of their grain yield, panicle characteristics, growth rates, and resistance to fungal diseases caused by Sclerospora graminicola (Sacc.) J. Schröt., Moesziomyces penicillariae (Bref.) K. Vánky, and Claviceps fusiformis Loveless. Populations were intercrossed using bulk pollen from 100 to 120 plants in each population to pollinate an equal number of plants in each of the other parental populations. The pollen-storage technique (Hanna, 1990) was used to facilitate crossing when the flowering times for certain parental population pairs were too far apart.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics, origins, and genetic background of 11 pearl millet parental populations of diallel crosses.

 
Field Trials
The resulting 55 F1 population crosses and their 11 parents were evaluated for 13 agronomic characters (Table 2) in replicated trials conducted across five environments [1993 rainy season at two sites (Patancheru, 18°N, 78°E; and Bhavanisagar, 11°N, 77°E); 1994 dry summer season, and 1994 and 1995 rainy seasons at one site (Patancheru)] in peninsular India. In each environment, the 66 entries (genotypes) were evaluated in three replications of 4-row by 4-m plots arranged in a randomized complete block design. Between-row spacing was 75 cm; within-row spacing was 15 cm; and 1-m alleys separated the plots. The soil type at Patancheru was a light-textured, red Alfisol. The soil type at Bhavanisagar was an Alfisol. The Bhavanisagar location environment was dry, cool, and overcast, and it was managed as fully irrigated. The 1994 dry summer season environment at Patancheru was characterized by high temperatures, low humidity, and limited cloud cover, and it was managed as fully irrigated. Intermediate temperatures and high humidity with more cloud cover characterized the three rainy-season environments at Patancheru, which were not irrigated.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Agronomic characteristics measured in two or more environments in this study.

 
Plant counts were taken from the two central rows of each plot after thinning to determine the actual plant population. Flowering time and plant height were assessed on a whole-plot basis (Table 2). At maturity, panicles in the two central rows were cut, sun-dried, weighed, and threshed to determine the grain yield per plot. Stover of the harvested rows was cut and dried to assess dry-matter yield. Growth index was calculated as described by Bramel-Cox et al. (1984).

Statistical Analysis
Analyses of variance were first performed on data from individual environments using Genstat Version 4, from Rothamsted Experimental Station, and Analysis II proposed by Gardner and Eberhart (1966) and Eberhart and Gardner (1966). Genetic parameters were estimated by fitting the population and population cross means to the fixed linear model:

where Yij is the mean of the cross between the ith and jth parental populations; µv is the mean of all parental populations; Vi and Vj are the varietal effects of parental population i and parental population j; h is the average heterosis contributed by all parental populations used in crosses; hi and hj are the average contributions of individual parental populations to the expression of heterosis; sij is the specific heterosis (specific combining ability, SCA) that occurs when parental population i is crossed to parental population j; and k = 0 when i = j, and k = 1 when i = j.

Genotype effects (Gij, 65 df) were first partitioned into varietal population effects (Vi, 10 df), and heterosis effects (hij, 55 df). Heterosis effects were further partitioned into average heterosis (h, 1 df), variety heterosis (hi, 10 df), and specific heterosis (sij, 44 df) effects.

Following the within-environment analyses for each character studied, combined analyses across environments were performed when error variances were homogenous. Environmental effects were considered to be random. Bartlett's test (Steel and Torrie, 1980, sect. 20.3) was used for assessing homogeneity of variance and the magnitude of genotype x environment (G x E) interaction mean squares. When the interaction was significant, it was used for testing significance of genotype mean squares and all the components. The G x E mean squares were used instead of the residual mean squares to calculate standard errors. General combining ability (GCA) for each parental population i was estimated as gi = 0.5Vi + hi. When G x E interaction effects were significant for a particular agronomic character, important sources of variation (i.e., particular parents and/or particular environments) contributing most to these interactions were identified by examining graphs of environment-wise rankings of the parental populations for GCA for that character following procedures outlined by Kang and Gauch (1996).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Coefficients of variation (CV) were <13% for individual environments (data not shown) for most characters studied, except for productive tillers and panicle length, for which the CV were >18%. Combined analyses of variance for eight agronomic characters measured over two to five environments are presented in Table 3. Genotype x environment interactions were significant for all characters except productive tillers, biomass, and growth index (the latter two characters were measured in only two environments), indicating that the relative performance of genotypes differed in the test environments. Although statistically significant for five characters, these G x E interactions were large enough to be of practical importance only in the case of grain yield (per season and per day) and plant height.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean squares of grain yield per season, grain yield per day, time to flowering, plant height, panicle length, productive tillers, biomass, and growth index for 11 pearl millet populations and their 55 diallel crosses, excluding reciprocals, evaluated across two to five environments{dagger} (E) at Patancheru and Bhavanisagar in peninsular India, during 1993 to 1995.

 
Genotype x environment interactions for grain yield per season did not seriously affect GCA ranks of the 11 parental populations for this character across the five environments in this study. The possible exceptions were parental populations ICMV 155, ICMP 92591, and ICMP 87307 (and perhaps ICMV 91059) at Bhavanisagar (Fig. 1a ; Table 4). A large portion of the G x E interaction for grain yield per season was due to the failure of ICMV 155 to perform consistently. This elite open-pollinated variety seemed to confer specific adaptation to Patancheru, but its crosses performed poorly at Bhavanisagar. Grain yield per season GCA rankings (Fig. 1a; Table 4) show a similar pattern across environments to those for grain yield per day (Fig. 1b; Table 4) for these parental populations. Five parental populations were major contributors to the G x E interaction for grain yield per day: ICMV 91059, ICMP 92591, ICMV 155, ICMP 87307, and AfPop 90. Population AfPop 90 appeared particularly poorly adapted to the Patancheru rainy season environments, whereas ICMV 155 and ICMV 91059 appeared particularly poorly adapted to the overcast, shorter day length, Bhavanisagar environment to which ICMP 92591 and ICMP 87307 appeared particularly well adapted. The GCA effects of SenPop for grain yield per season were consistently good in all test environments, indicating the wide adaptation and high potential of this feeder population (broad-based composite of intermediate eliteness, from which superior progenies are extracted to diversify more elite populations) for use as a parent in developing populations and hybrids with high-yield potential (Fig. 1a; Table 4). Populations ICMV 91059, SenPop, and ICMP 91751 and their crosses tended to give consistently high grain yields per season in all test environments, whereas LHGP, AfPop 88, and NWC C2 and their crosses yielded poorly in all test environments. Between these two groups of parental populations were a consistently intermediate group of populations (i.e., AfPop 90 and ICMP 87200) and an inconsistent group comprising ICMV 155, ICMP 92591, and ICMP 87307 that were major contributors to G x E interactions for grain yield (per season and per day) due to the markedly different performances of these populations and their crosses at Patancheru and Bhavanisagar.




View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Ranked estimates of general combining ability effects for (a) grain yield per season, (b) grain yield per day, (c) time to flowering, and (d) plant height based on evaluation of 11 pearl millet parental populations and their 55 crosses across five environments in peninsular India during 1993 to 1995. For each character, the 11 parental populations are arranged along the x-axis in rank order (from lowest to highest) of the sums of their ranks for general combining ability effects for that character across all five environments. Deviations from a 1:1 line are indicative of rank-change-type genotype x environment interactions for that character. Key: {blacksquare} = ranked sum of ranks across all five environments; {blacktriangleup} = ranked sum of ranks across three rainy season environments (not irrigated) at Patancheru; • = ranks in one irrigated hot dry season at Patancheru; {circ} = ranks in one irrigated cool dry season at Bhavanisagar.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Environment-wise ranks of general combining ability effects for grain yield per season, grain yield per day, time to flowering, and plant height for 11 pearl millet populations evaluated (with their 55 diallel crosses, excluding reciprocals) across five environments{dagger} at Patancheru and Bhavanisagar in peninsular India, during 1993 and 1995.

 
The variation in GCA-rank order of parental populations across environments was much less for flowering time (Fig. 1c; Table 4) and plant height (Fig. 1d; Table 4). For plant height, ICMP 87307 and AfPop 88 (and to a lesser extent SenPop, ICMP 91751, and AfPop 90) contributed much of the variation in rank order and hence much of the G x E interaction. Although statistically significant (Table 3), the G x E interactions for flowering time were small and of little practical importance (Fig. 1c; Table 4), as was also observed for panicle length (not shown).

Ouendeba et al. (1996) compared the diallel variety-cross Analysis II of Gardner and Eberhart (1966) with the more traditional Analysis III (Gardner and Eberhart, 1966) that first separates parents and crosses before partitioning the latter into GCA and SCA. They observed that the average heterosis sum of squares of the former analysis is equal to the parents vs. crosses contrast of the latter, and that specific heterosis is equal to SCA, whereas the other two components of the genotype effects of the Analysis II (i.e., varietal effects of the parental populations and population heterosis effects) are different from any provided by the more traditional Analysis III. Assuming a restricted genetic model of additive and dominance effects only, these latter two sources of variation in the Gardner–Eberhart Analysis II give a better separation of additive and dominance effects than can be otherwise obtained from the current data set without resorting to additional experiments involving additional inbred populations. Under these assumptions, the heterosis terms in the Gardner–Eberhart Analysis II are all due to dominance and differences in allelic frequencies between pairs of parental populations, and the mean squares for Vi effects of the parental populations contain all variation due to additive genetic effects (as well as some dominance). Hence we examined these two sources of variation (Vi and heterosis) for each of the eight agronomic characters analyzed in this pearl millet variety-cross diallel.

Parental populations differed (P < 0.01) for all eight characters, as indicated by the highly significant Vi effects (Table 3). Heterosis effects (hij) were significant for grain yield per season, time to flowering, and panicle length. Average heterosis effects (h) were significant only for grain yield per season and time to flowering, while hi and/or sij effects were significant for time to flowering, plant height, panicle length, and biomass. These results indicate that additive genetic effects were generally as important, if not more important, than dominance in controlling the observed agronomic characters in this set of diallel crosses. These results are probably due to the intrapopulation improvement methods used in developing the parental populations studied here, which are more effective at using additive genetic variation than that due to dominance, heterosis, or epistasis. These results agree with the findings of Singh et al. (1982) and Ouendeba et al. (1993) for grain yield, but are markedly different from those of Ouendeba et al. (1996) for forage yield. Zaveri (1982) also indicated that additive genetic variance was the most important component of genetic variance in a diallel cross of pearl millet populations.

General combining ability and Vi effects for each of the eight agronomic characters are presented in Table 5. Predominance of GCA differences and significant Vi effects suggest that variation among crosses was mainly due to additive rather than nonadditive gene effects. A more definitive separation of additive, dominance, and other non-additive genetic effects for these characters requires evaluation of additional populations, followed by the more comprehensive diallel variety-cross Analysis I of Gardner and Eberhart (1966). Although less than definitive, results from the current study indicate that these characters can be improved easily through breeding using a range of different intrapopulation and interpopulation selection procedures, and that hybrid cultivars based on crosses among these populations would not be expected to have clear performance advantages over open-pollinated cultivars before several cycles of interpopulation improvement.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Means, general combining ability effects (gi), and parental populations effects (Vi) for grain yield per season, grain yield per day, time to flowering, plant height, panicle length and productive tillers (five environments), and biomass and growth index (two environments) of 11 pearl millet populations based on evaluation of these parental populations and their 55 crosses, excluding reciprocals, at Patancheru and Bhavanisagar in peninsular India, during 1993 to 1995.

 

    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Information from this study may apply to pearl millet breeding programs in Latin America, eastern and southern Africa, and South Asia. Our results reveal that genetic variability among the parental populations exists for some, but not all, agronomic characters studied, and much of this genetic variation appears to be additive in nature. This indicates that these parental populations can be intercrossed and recombined to develop broader-based elite composites with high grain yield and sufficient genetic variability for their successful exploitation in future recurrent-selection programs. Parental populations with good performance per se and good performance in crosses for most agronomic characters included ICMP 87307, ICMP 91751, ICMP 92591, ICMV 155, ICMV 91059, and SenPop. These populations have good GCA for several agronomic characters and should be exploited by developing one or more broad-based composite populations with improved agronomic performance. The two feeder populations (AfPop 88 and AfPop 90) and broad-based genepool (LHGP) had poor GCA for most characters, but had positive combining abilities for panicle length. AfPop 90 and LHGP also had positive Vi effects for biomass and growth index. However, these three parental populations and their crosses were generally very late to flower, had thick stems, and had very limited tillering capacity (as well as small grain size [data not shown]). They may prove more useful for developing fodder populations than dual-purpose (grain and stover) populations for Indian conditions, at least in the short and medium term. ICMP 87200 had poor GCA for most characters, but its population crosses with ICMP 87307 and ICMV 91059 had excellent grain yields (data not shown), suggesting that opportunities exist to exploit its genetic variability in breeding hybrids.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors express their gratitude to James G. Coors and other anonymous reviewers for critical assessments of earlier drafts that greatly strengthened the clarity of this article.


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
ICRISAT Journal Article no. 2246. Reports thesis research submitted by A.M. Ali in partial fulfilment of requirements for the M.S. degree at the Univ. of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan. This research was supported in part by the UNDP/RAB/88/003 Sorghum and Millet Development Project.

Received for publication October 19, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
Y. Zhang, M. S. Kang, and K. R. Lamkey
DIALLEL-SAS05: A Comprehensive Program for Griffing's and Gardner-Eberhart Analyses
Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1097 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. Presterl and E. Weltzien
Exploiting Heterosis in Pearl Millet for Population Breeding in Arid Environments
Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 767 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Raj, A.G.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Raj, A.G.B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Raj, A.G.B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Grain Crops
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Right arrow Crop Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome