Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:1579-1585 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fonts, C.
Right arrow Articles by León, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fonts, C.
Right arrow Articles by León, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fonts, C.
Right arrow Articles by León, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Sunflower

Phenological Characterization of Near-Isogenic Sunflower Families Bearing Two QTLs for Photoperiodic Response

C. Fontsa, F. H. Andradea,*, M. Grondonab, A. Hallc and A. J. Leónb

a Unidad Integrada INTA Balcarce, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNMP, Ruta 226 Km 73.5 (7620) Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina
b Advanta Semillas SAIC Ruta 226 Km 60.5 (7620) Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina
c IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires/CONICET, Av. San Martín 4453 (1417), Buenos Aires, Argentina


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Relationship between floral stage and days after emergence for the near-isogenic families AHBH, AHBZ, AZBH, and AZBZ, and for sunflower parental lines HA89 and ZENB8 grown under extended (triangles) and short (circles) photoperiods. Each point indicates an individual observation. Floral stages are from Marc and Palmer (1981). Continuous (short photoperiod) and dashed (extended photoperiod) lines are fitted linear regressions. Upper and lower panels are from replicate experiments.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Timing of apex differentiation (B0) expressed in days after emergence as a function of allele constitution at quantitative trait loci (QTLs) A and B under short (continuous line) and extended (dashed line) photoperiods. Data points indicate values for each replicate experiment. AHBH and AZBZ include data from HA89 and ZenB8, respectively, because of similar allele constitution at QTLs A and B.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Slope of the relationship between days after emergence and floral stage (B1) as a function of allele constitution at quantitative trait loci (QTLs) A and B under short (continuous line) and long (dashed line) photoperiods. Data points indicate values for each replicate experiment. AHBH and AZBZ include data from HA89 and ZenB8, respectively, because of similar allele constitution at QTLs A and B.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Crop Science Society of America.