HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Glaz, B. Articles by Kang, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Glaz, B. Articles by Kang, M. S. Agricola Articles by Glaz, B. Articles by Kang, M. S. Related Collections Germplasm Enhancement Sugarcane Crop Genetics

Location Contributions Determined via GGE Biplot Analysis of Multienvironment Sugarcane Genotype-Performance Trials

^a USDA-ARS Sugarcane Field Station, 12990 U.S. Highway 441 N, Canal Point, FL 33438
^b School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110, current address: Punjab Agricultural Univ., Ludhiana 141 004, India. Mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by USDA, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, or Punjab Agric. Univ. over others not mentioned

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Biplot representing a vector view of locations (testers) used to test the mean (plant-cane through second-ratoon crop cycles) cane yields of promising Canal Point sugarcane genotypes. (See Table 1 for location names.)

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. GGE biplot for mean (plant-cane through second-ratoon crop cycles) cane yields, showing comparison of nine locations used to test promising Canal Point sugarcane genotypes with an "ideal" location (most representative and most discriminating). (See Table 1 for location names.)

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Biplot representing a vector view of locations (testers) used to test the mean (plant-cane through second-ratoon crop cycles) yields of theoretical recoverable sucrose of promising Canal Point sugarcane genotypes. (See Table 1 for location names.)

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. GGE biplot for mean (plant-cane through second-ratoon crop cycles) yield of theoretical recoverable sucrose, showing comparison of nine locations used to test promising Canal Point sugarcane genotypes with an "ideal" location (most representative and most discriminating). (See Table 1 for location names.)

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Biplot representing a vector view of locations (testers) used to test the mean (plant-cane through second-ratoon crop cycles) sucrose yields of promising Canal Point sugarcane genotypes. (See Table 1 for location names.)

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. GGE biplot for mean (plant-cane through second-ratoon crop cycles) sucrose yield, showing comparison of nine locations used to test promising Canal Point sugarcane genotypes with an "ideal" location (most representative and most discriminating). (See Table 1 for location names.)