Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 March 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:678-687 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hoogenboom, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hoogenboom, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hoogenboom, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Models
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Simulation-Based Analysis of Effects of Vrn and Ppd Loci on Flowering in Wheat

Jeffrey W. Whitea,*, Markus Herndlb, L. A. Huntc, Thomas S. Payned and Gerrit Hoogenboome

a USDA-ARS, Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, 21881 N. Cardon Ln., Maricopa, AZ 85239
b Institute of Crop Production and Grassland Research (340), Univ. of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
c Dep. of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Bldg., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
d International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Ap. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico DF, Mexico
e Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223-1797. Mention of a specific product name by the U.S. Department of Agriculture does not constitute an endorsement and does not imply a recommendation over other suitable products


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Comparisons of observed vs. simulated days to flowering for the evaluation datasets using different values of the coefficients P1V and P1D for the simulations: (A) conventionally estimated coefficients; (B) gene-based coefficients; (C) coefficients for a single generic cultivar (estimated as means of the conventional estimates). Fitted lines are for linear regressions with slopes and intercepts as given in Table 4.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Comparisons of residuals of regression with the generic cultivar vs. simulated days to flowering for the evaluation datasets using different values of the coefficients P1V and P1D for the simulations. Fitted lines are for linear regressions estimated separately for spring or winter types: (A) conventionally estimated coefficients; (B) gene-based coefficients.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Crop Science Society of America.