Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 March 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:417-423 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, W.
Right arrow Articles by Frégeau-Reid, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yan, W.
Right arrow Articles by Frégeau-Reid, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yan, W.
Right arrow Articles by Frégeau-Reid, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Oat
Right arrow Data Management

Breeding Line Selection Based on Multiple Traits

Weikai Yan* and Judith Frégeau-Reid

Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre (ECORC), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Neatby Building, 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6


Figure 1
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The multitrait selection interface that combines independent selection, independent culling, and index selection. The data were first scaled to [0, 1] range (0 for minimum and 1 for maximum) for each trait before the selections were applied. The weights for protein, oil, groat, and beta-glucan were set to 0.3, –0.5, 1.0, and 0.5, respectively. Single trait selection rate for the checked traits was 10% of the trait ranges adjusted by their respective weights. Single trait cutting rate was 30% of the trait ranges adjusted by their weights. Overall cutting rate based on selection index was 50% of the entries. All traits were selected for high levels, while oil and beta-glucan were also selected for low levels.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. The genotype by trait (GT) biplot of 150 covered oat genotypes for four quality traits. The traits are groat content and oil, protein, and beta-glucan (BGLUCAN) concentrations in the groat.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. The same genotype by trait (GT) biplot as Fig. 2 modified to show the trait profiles of the selected vs. discarded genotypes based on the comprehensive selection scheme (1 for genotypes selected and 0 for genotypes discarded based on the comprehensive selection scheme). BGLUCAN, beta-glucan; SVP, singular value partitioning method.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Genotype by trait (GT) biplot of 10 genotypes with extreme trait profiles. BGLUCAN, beta-glucan.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Genotype by trait (GT) biplot of 140 genotypes with less extreme trait profiles (1 for genotypes selected and 0 for genotypes discarded based on the comprehensive selection scheme). BGLUCAN, beta-glucan.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Crop Science Society of America.