Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 January 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:380-388 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, R. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Root Growth/Water Uptake Models
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Yield, Root Growth, and Soil Water Content in Drought-Stressed Pasture Mixtures Containing Chicory

R. Howard Skinner*

USDA-ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Building 3702 Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Early-summer yields for well-watered (wet) and drought-stressed (dry) two-species grass–legume and three-species grass–legume–chicory mixtures. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Late-summer yields for well-watered (wet) and drought-stressed (dry) two-species grass–legume and three-species grass–legume–chicory mixtures. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Root distribution with soil depth for two- and three-species mixtures. (A) Initial distribution at the beginning of first drought-stress treatment (6 June 2003). (B) Distribution beneath well-watered plots on 1 July 2003. (C) Distribution beneath drought-stressed plots on 1 July 2003. Each point represents the mean of four replications and five frames (6.75 cm depth). Error bars represent ± 1 SE.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effect of drought treatments on soil volumetric water content at 25-, 50-, and 75-cm depths in 2003. No significant differences existed between the two- and three-species mixtures in 2003 for either moisture treatment on any date.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effect of drought treatments on soil volumetric water content at 25-, 50-, and 75-cm depths in 2004. * indicates dates when significant differences occurred between the two-and three-species mixtures under drought stress.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Soil water potential at 25-cm depth during the final 18 d of drought stress in 2003 for two-species (grass–legume) and three-species (grass–legume–chicory) mixtures. Standard errors are indicated by gray shaded area. Only negative standard error values are shown to improve clarity.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Crop Science Society of America.