Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 18 December 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:S-190-S-201 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bordes, J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bordes, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bordes, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Maize

The Use of Doubled Haploids in Recurrent Selection and Hybrid Development in Maize

A. Gallaisa,* and J. Bordesb

a INRA-UPS-CNRS-INAPG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
b UMR Amélioration des Plantes, INRA-UBP, 234 Avenue du Brezet, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France


Figure 1
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Genetic advance per year, in genetic standard deviations, according to S0 heritability, with the use of off-season generations and the same selection intensity (PS0= 0.05).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Genetic advance per year in standard deviations according to S0 heritability, with the use of off-season generations, the same investment in trials per year and the same effective population size for a given duration.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Relative efficiency of the methods according to S0 heritability, with the use of off-season generations, the same investment in trials per year and the same effective population size for a given duration.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Expected total genetic advance at the level of variety development (VD) from DHT-RS versus S0T-RS. Predicted results for S0T-RS in 2 yr + 3 yr for VD are the same as for DHT-RS in 4 yr and one year more for VD. For the computation we have considered constraints given in Table 3, and hS02= 0.50. Lines for DHT 4 yr + VD one year and S0T 2 yr + VD 3 yr are the same.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Expected total genetic advance at the level of variety development (VD) from DHT-RS versus S1T-RS. For the computation we have considered constraints given in Table 3, and hS02 = 0.50.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.