Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 November 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:2486-2494 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pursley, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pursley, W. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pursley, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

Carbon Dioxide Enhancement Effects in Container- versus Ground-Grown Soybean at Equal Planting Densities

Edwin L. Fiscusa,*, Fitzgerald L. Bookera, Jean-Jacques B. Duboisa, Thomas W. Ruftyb, Joseph W. Burtonc and Walter A. Pursleya

a USDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit and Dep. of Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., 3908 Inwood Rd., Raleigh, NC 27603
b Dep. of Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
c USDA-ARS, Soybean and Nitrogen Fixation Research Unit and Dep. Crop Sci. North Carolina State Univ., 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC 27607. The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the USDA or the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, nor any criticism of similar ones not mentioned


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. (A) Net photosynthetic rates and (B) stomatal conductance values obtained during the reproductive period for both container- and ground-grown soybean in open-top chambers. Bars are ± SE, and the smooth lines are the quadratic fit of the data with the coefficients given in Table 2. Treatments were all charcoal-filtered air (CF) with plants grown in the ground (G) or in 21 L containers (C) at current ambient (370 µmol CO2 mol–1 air) or elevated (700 µmol CO2 mol–1 air) CO2 concentrations.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. (A) Diurnal root zone maximum, (B) minimum, and (C) diurnal temperature range (DTR). Treatments were all charcoal-filtered air (CF) with plants grown in the ground (G) or in 21-L containers (C) at current ambient (370 µmol CO2 mol–1 air) or elevated (700 µmol CO2 mol–1 air) CO2 concentrations. All temperatures were measured at a depth of about 20 cm.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.