Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 November 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:2462-2472 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bussan, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Drilias, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bussan, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Drilias, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bussan, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Drilias, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Potato
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Evaluation of the Effect of Density on Potato Yield and Tuber Size Distribution

Alvin J. Bussan*, Paul D. Mitchell, Michael E. Copas and Michael J. Drilias

Dep. of Horticulture and Dep. of Agriculture and Applied Economics, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Influence of in-row spacing on potato plant population near Coloma, WI, in 2002 and 2003.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Response of potato stem density to potato plant density in commercial production field during 2002 and 2003 near Coloma, WI.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Potato tuber density response to plant and stem density in a commercial potato production field during 2002 and 2003 near Coloma, WI.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Relationship between potato yield and plant, stem, and tuber density in commercial field trials during 2002 and 2003 near Coloma, WI.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Average tuber size in response to stem and tuber density in commercial field trials during 2002 and 2003 near Coloma, WI.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. (a) Proportion of tubers fitting into each size category from three plots selected with high, medium, and low density, and (b) observed versus estimated proportion of tubers within each size category for a select plot from commercial field trials near Coloma, WI.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Observed and estimated cumulative proportion of potato tubers with increasing tuber size across different stem densities in commercial field trials near Coloma, WI, across 2002 and 2003. Individual data points were provided ({circ}) to illustrate fit of the predicted response.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Estimated tuber size distribution across different stem densities estimated with data from commercial field trials from 2002 and 2003 near Coloma, WI.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.