Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:2058-2066 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Pest Management Systems

Recovery of Imidazolinone-Resistant Hard Red Wheat Lines Following Imazamox Application

Bradley D. Hansona,*, Lynn Fandricha, Dale L. Shanerb, Philip Westraa and Scott J. Nissena

a Dep. of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
b USDA-ARS Water Management Unit, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 320, Fort Collins, CO 80526. B.D. Hanson's current address is USDA-ARS Water Management Research Unit, 9611 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648. This article is a U.S. government work and is in the public domain in the USA


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Biomass production of hard red wheat near-isolines after imazamox treatment in the greenhouse. Data are expressed as a percent of the untreated plants 21 d after treatment (DAT) (potential biomass). Symbols and lines represent quadratic regression predictions and 95% confidence intervals.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Imazamox-resistant acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme activity in hard red wheat near-isolines following an in vitro application of 50 µmol L–1 imazamox. Data are expressed as a percentage of the untreated controls. Lines are linear regression predictions and symbols are mean and standard error values from two independent experiments with eight replications.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Extractable acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme activity in herbicide-resistant and -susceptible hard red wheat near-isolines following treatment with a 105 g ha–1 imazamox. Data are expressed as a percentage of untreated plants. Lines are predicted values based on an exponential decay nonlinear regression model (Eq. [1]) while symbols are mean and standard error values from two independent experiments with eight replications.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Recovery of imazamox-susceptible acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme activity in hard red wheat near-isolines following a 105 g ha–1 imazamox treatment. Data are expressed as a percentage of total ALS activity and are corrected for total extractable enzyme activity. Lines are predicted values based on an exponential rise nonlinear regression model (Eq. [2]) while symbols are mean and standard error values from two independent experiments with 8 replications.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.