Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:703-708 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Creus, C.
Right arrow Articles by León, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Creus, C.
Right arrow Articles by León, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Creus, C.
Right arrow Articles by León, A. J.

Disease Expression and Ecophysiological Yield Components in Sunflower Isohybrids with and without Verticillium dahliae Resistance

C. Creusa,c, M. E. Bazzalob,c,*, M. Grondonab, F. Andradea and A. J. Leónb

a Unidad Integrada INTA Balcarce, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNMP, Ruta 226 Km 60.5 (7620) Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina
b ADVANTA SEMILLAS SAIC Ruta 226 Km 60.5 (7620) Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina
c contributed equally to this work


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Relation between yield losses (%) and V. dahliae disease severity (DS) (%) at four different locations, under natural infection, in nine sunflower susceptible (S) isohybrids without resistance (R). Yield losses were calculated as (R yield–S yield)/R yield. Data from Trial 1.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Disease progression over time in terms of disease incidence (DI) and disease severity (DS) for resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isohybrids under V. dahliae natural infections. Data are mean values of isohybrids 2A, 4B, and 5B. Data from Trial 2.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Percent radiation interception as a function of time expressed as days after sowing (DAS) for resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isohybrids under V. dahliae natural infections. Standard error (SE) was 1.8 and 3.6% for 89 and 102 days after sowing (DAS), respectively. Data are means of isohybrid 2A and 4B. Flowering took place at 70 DAS and physiological maturity at approximately 105 DAS. Data from Trial 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Aboveground dry matter accumulation as a function of time expressed as days after sowing (DAS) for resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isohybrids under V. dahliae natural infections. Differences were statistically significant at 92 DAS (SE = 79 g m–2) and at the final harvest (SE = 32 g m–2). Data are means of isohybrid 2A and 4B. Beginning of flowering took place at 70 DAS and physiological maturity at approximately 105 DAS. Data from Trial 2.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Individual grain weight as a function of time expressed as days after flowering (DAF) for resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isohybrids under V. dahliae natural infections. Differences were statistically significant after 20 DAF (SE = 0.74, 1.26, 2.31, 1.74, and 2.00 mg at 14, 21, 29, 37, and 45 DAF, respectively). Data for isohybrid 2A. Grainfilling rate estimated from 14 to 29 DAF was 1.41 and 1.26 mg d–1 for R and S cultivars, respectively. Data from Trial 2.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.