HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yan, W. Articles by Cornelius, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Yan, W. Articles by Cornelius, P. L. Agricola Articles by Yan, W. Articles by Cornelius, P. L. Related Collections Statistics Crop Genetics Biometrics Software

GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data

^a Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre (ECORC), Agric. and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6
^b Dep. of Agronomy & Environ. Mgmt., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110
^c Cereal Research Center (CRC), AAFC, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, R3T 2M9
^d Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences and Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506. ECORC contribution number: 06-688

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. The "which-won-where" view of the GGE biplot based on the G x E data in Table 1. The data were not transformed ("Transform = 0"), not scaled ("Scaling = 0"), and were environment-centered ("Centering = 2"). The biplot was based on environment-focused singular value partitioning ("SVP = 2") and therefore is appropriate for visualizing the relationships among environments. It explained 78% of the total G+GE. The genotypes are labeled as G1 to G18 and the environments are labeled as E1 to E9.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. The "mean vs. stability" view of the GGE biplot based on a subset of the G x E data in Table 1. The data were not transformed ("Transform = 0"), not scaled ("Scaling = 0"), and were environment-centered ("Centering = 2"). The biplot was based on genotype-focused singular value partitioning ("SVP = 1") and therefore is appropriate for visualizing the similarities among genotypes. It explained 79.5% of the total G+GE for the subset.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. The "discriminating power vs. representativeness" view of the GGE biplot based on a subset of the G x E data in Table 1. The data were not transformed ("Transform = 0"), not scaled ("Scaling = 0"), and were environment-centered ("Centering = 2"). The biplot was based on genotype-focused singular value partitioning ("SVP = 2") and therefore is appropriate for visualizing the relationships among environments. It explained 79.5% of the total G+GE for the subset.