Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 22 January 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:77-82 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Springer, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gillen, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Springer, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gillen, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Springer, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gillen, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Cytology
Right arrow Forage Management

How Does Plant Population Density Affect the Yield, Quality, and Canopy of Native Bluestem (Andropogon spp.) Forage?

T. L. Springer* and R. L. Gillen

USDA-ARS, Southern Plains Range Research Station, 2000 18th St., Woodward, OK 73801


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Average forage dry matter (DM) yield of Andropogon spp. grown at six plant densities. A line was added to the plot to aid in data interpretation. Each data point is the mean ± SE of 24 experimental units averaged across years and species.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Average crude protein (CP) concentration of Andropogon spp. grown at six plant densities. A line was added to the plot to aid in data interpretation. Each data point is the mean ± SE of 24 experimental units averaged across years and species.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Average plant canopy height of Andropogon spp. grown at six plant densities. A line was added to plot to aid in data interpretation. Each data point is the mean ± SE of 24 experimental units averaged across years and species.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Average culm density of big bluestem and sand bluestem plants grown at six plant densities. A line was added to plot to aid in data interpretation. Each data point is the mean ± SE of 24 experimental units averaged across years and species.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Average leaf density of big bluestem and sand bluestem grown at six plant densities. Data points were slightly offset to eliminate hidden information and lines were added to plot to aid in data interpretation. Each data point is the mean ± SE of 12 experimental units averaged across years.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Average leaf area index of big bluestem and sand bluestem grown at six plant densities. Data points were slightly offset to eliminate hidden information and lines were added to plot to aid in data interpretation. Each data point is the mean ± SE of 12 experimental units averaged across years.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.