Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 September 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:2033-2040 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wester, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wester, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wester, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

Influence of Irrigation on Mineral Concentrations in Three Old World Bluestem Species

D. Philippa,*, C. P. Brownb, V. G. Allenb and D. B. Westerc

a Agronomy Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010
b Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409-2122
c Dep. of Range, Wildlife, and Fisheries, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409-2122


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Manganese concentration as influenced by Bothriochloa caucasica, B. ischaemum, and B. bladhii; and influenced by dryland and irrigation levels of low, medium, and high. Data for months July and October, and years 2002 and 2003 were combined. A Indicates a significant contrast of dryland vs. irrigated levels (P < 0.05) within one plant species. x, y Indicates a linear (x) or quadratic (y) response of manganese concentration to increased irrigation within one plant species (P < 0.05). a, b, c Means not followed by the same superscript differ in manganese concentration within a single water treatment (P < 0.05). NS Not significant at P < 0.05.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Uptake of P as influenced by Bothriochloa caucasica, B. ischaemum, and B. bladhii; and influenced by dryland and irrigation levels of low, medium, and high in July and October. Data for years 2002 and 2003 were combined. a, b Means not followed by the same superscript differ in P uptake within a single water treatment (P < 0.05). NS Not significant at P < 0.05.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Uptake of N as influenced by Bothriochloa caucasica, B. ischaemum, and B. bladhii; and influenced by dryland and irrigation levels of low, medium, and high in July and October. Data for yr 2002 and 2003 were combined. a, b, c Means not followed by the same superscript differ in N-uptake within a single water treatment (P < 0.05). NS Not significant at P < 0.05.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.