Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 20 June 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1787-1792 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaver, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaver, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shaver, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass Management
Right arrow Seed Establishment
Right arrow Turfgrass

Dormant Seeding Bermudagrass Cultivars in a Transition-Zone Environment

B. R. Shavera, M. D. Richardsona,*, J. H. McCallaa, D. E. Karchera and P. J. Bergerb

a Dep. of Horticulture, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
b Dep. of Men's Athletics, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Percentage turfgrass cover of bermudagrass as affected by various seeding dates for the 2004 and 2005 trial. The LSD bars can be used to compare cover at each evaluation date (P = 0.05).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Percentage turfgrass cover of bermudagrass as affected by cultivar in 2005. Statistical differences (P = 0.05) between cultivars are indicated by *.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Germination date (day of year), as affected by cultivar and seeding date in 2004 and 2005. Statistical differences among cultivars are indicated by * (significant at P = 0.05) or NS (not significant).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Seedling density as affected by seeding dates (top graphs) and cultivar (bottom graphs). Letters on top of each bar indicate significant differences in seedling density among main effects within 2004 and 2005.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Average weekly soil temperatures (open circles) and germination dates for February and March plantings of ‘Princess 77’ and ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass in Fayetteville, AR, in 2004 and 2005. Soil temperature (2.54 cm) was regressed over time to predict soil temperature at germination.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.