Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 18 May 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1456-1461 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zou, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hymowitz, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zou, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hymowitz, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zou, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hymowitz, T.

SSR Markers Exhibit Trisomic Segregation Distortion in Soybean

J. J. Zoua,*, R. J. Singhd, J. Leec, S. J. Xub and T. Hymowitzd

a Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Johnston, IA 50131
b USDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, ND 58105
c Genetic Resources Division, National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Suweon, 441-701, South Korea
d Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Segregation ratios of SSR markers in different F2 populations. The linkage groups were according to Cregan et al. (1999). Linkage groups A, B, and C were developed by USDA/Iowa State Univ., the Univ. of Utah, and the Univ. of Nebraska, respectively. Segregation ratios were based on marker classes of Triplo 4: F1: PI 407287.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. a, b SSR pattern of trisomic derived F2 individuals amplified using Satt565. T: Triplo 4; S: G. soja PI 407218; F1: F1 hybrid; Arrows point to the specific F2 plant that was homozygous for the least frequent homozygous marker class. a SSR marker analysis of 57 F2 plants from a Triplo 4 F1 hybrid (F1–2 in Fig. 1). G. soja PI 407287 marker class was least represented in F2 population. b SSR marker analysis of 55 F2 plants from a Triplo 4 F1 hybrid (F1–1 in Fig. 1). Triplo 4 marker class was least represented in F2 population.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Diagrammatic presentation of random chromosome segregation showing trisomic segregation of simplex F1 (Aaa).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.