Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 April 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1336-1340 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparg, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by van Staden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sparg, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by van Staden, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sparg, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by van Staden, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Seed Treatment
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Seed Technology

Aerosol Smoke and Smoke-Water Stimulation of Seedling Vigor of a Commercial Maize Cultivar

S. G. Sparg, M. G. Kulkarni and J. van Staden*

Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effects of (A) smoke–water and (B) aerosol smoke on the percentage germination of maize after 7 d under 16:8h light/dark period at 25 ± 0.5°C. Asterisks indicates values significantly different from the control (p < 0.05). Values above standard error bars represent vigor indices.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of various soaking treatments with smoke–water (SW, 1:1000 dilution) and aerosol smoke (90 min exposure) on the percentage germination of maize after 7 d under 16:8h light/dark period at 25 ± 0.5°C. Control seeds were not soaked. Symbols are with standard error bars.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of presoaking seeds following aerosol smoke treatment for different periods on the vigor index of maize seedlings after 7 d under 16:8h light/dark period at 25 ± 0.5°C. Seeds were presoaked in water for different durations before exposure to aerosol smoke. Vigor index for the control was 1165. Average coefficient of variation (%) for 30 min smoke were 13.2 (rinsed) and 18.2 (nonrinsed), 60 min smoke were 26.4 (rinsed) and 40 (nonrinsed), 90 min smoke were 26 (rinsed) and 50 (nonrinsed).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of (A) smoke–water and (B) aerosol smoke on the growth of maize seedlings after 7 d under 16:8h light/dark period at 25 ± 0.5°C. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level. Error bars denote standard error.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Seven-day-old maize seedlings germinated from seeds treated with (A) smoke–water at different concentrations and (B) aerosol smoke for different exposure periods (germinated after rinsing in water). Bar represents 10 mm.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.