Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 April 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1323-1330 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breseghello, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sorrells, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Breseghello, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sorrells, M. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Breseghello, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sorrells, M. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Association Analysis as a Strategy for Improvement of Quantitative Traits in Plants

Flavio Breseghelloa and Mark E. Sorrellsb,*

a Embrapa Rice and Beans, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GO, Brazil, 75375
b Dep. of Plant Breeding, Cornell University, 252 Emerson Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853-1902


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Variation of Pr(A|M) as a function of recombination frequency (c) and frequency of M from other parents (variable {theta}), over 20 generations, with {phi} = 0.05 and no selection.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of selection based on the phenotype, the marker genotype, or a combination of both, for different levels of linkage between marker and gene, on Pr(A|M)– continuous lines– and Pr(A)– dashed lines– with {phi} = 0.05 and {theta} = 0. The relative fitness of genotypes AA, Aa and aa was 1, 0.9 and 0.8, respectively, and of genotypes MM, Mm, and mm was 1, 0.75 and 0.5, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.