Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 February 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:886-892 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sugarcane
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Effect of Genotype and Genotype x Nitrogen Rate Interactions on Color in Juice and Raw Sugar from Sugarcane

Phillip A. Jacksona,*, Michael G. O'Sheab, Allan R. Ratteyc, Graham D. Bonnettd, Patricia F. Lindemanb, Mike C. Coxe, Joan E. Vickersf and Terry Morgang

a CSIRO Plant Industry, Davies Lab., PMB, PO Aitkenvale, Qld. 4814 Australia
b Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Meiers Road Indooroopilly, Qld. 4068 Australia
c Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Gordonvale, Qld. 4865 Australia
d CSIRO Plant industry, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld. 4066 Australia
e Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Bundaberg, Qld. 4670 Australia
f Dep. of Biological and Physical Sciences, Univ. of Southern Queensland, West St, Toowoomba, Qld. 4350 Australia
g CSR Ltd, Kalamia Mill Estate, Ayr, Qld. 4807 Australia


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Color (I.C.420) at pH 4 and 9, and color (at pH 7) at 1% impurity, versus color at pH 7, across 12 genotypes in Exp. 2. This experiment evaluated genotypes across three contrasting N rates, and the average of genotypes across all N levels is shown. Vertical and horizontal bars indicate least significant differences (P < 0.05).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Performance of genotypes in Exp. 3 for: (a) Color (I.C.420) in 2000 versus 2001, (b) color at 1% impurity in 2000 versus 2001, (c) color at 1% impurity versus mean color averaged across 2000 and 2001, and (d) amino N levels in 2000 versus 2001. In this experiment genotypes were tested across three N rate treatments and two time of harvesting treatments in a plant crop (2000) and ratoon crop (2001). Genotype x N rate or time of harvesting effects were not significant and the average of genotypes across treatments in each year are shown here. Vertical and horizontal bars indicate standard errors.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.