HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Franco, J. Articles by Taba, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Franco, J. Articles by Taba, S. Agricola Articles by Franco, J. Articles by Taba, S. Related Collections Plant Genetic Resources Statistics

Sampling Strategies for Conserving Maize Diversity When Forming Core Subsets Using Genetic Markers

^a Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Av. Garzón 780 CP 12900. Montevideo, Uruguay
^b International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico D.F., Mexico

View larger version (59K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Plot of the difference between the value of 24 strategies (Table 1) and the M strategy for six selection criteria, MSs (1a), CEs (1b) SHs (1c), HEs (1d), NEs (1e), and PNs (1f) for the bulk data set. Horizontal dash lines indicated critical values for Dunnet test (P 0.01) of the differences of each strategy above and below the M strategy from the mean of 20 replicates.

View larger version (60K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Plot of the difference between the value of 24 strategies (Table 1) and the M strategy for six selection criteria, MSs (2a), CEs (2b) SHs (2c), HEs (2d), NEs (2e), and PNs (2f) for the accession data set. Horizontal dash lines indicate critical values for Dunnet test (P 0.01) of the differences of each strategy above and below the M strategy from the mean of 20 replicates.

View larger version (49K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Plot of the difference between the value of 24 strategies (Table 1) and the M strategy for six selection criteria, MSs (3a), CEs (3b) SHs (3c), HEs (3d), NEs (3e), and PNs (3f) for the population data set. Horizontal dash lines indicated critical values for Dunnet test (P 0.01) of the differences of each strategy above and below the M strategy from the mean of 20 replicates.