Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 January 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:321-329 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Somers, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Somers, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Somers, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Selection for Lodging Resistance in Early Generations of Field Pea by Molecular Markers

Chunzhen Zhanga,*,{dagger}, Bunyamin Tar'anb,{dagger}, Tom Warkentin'b, Abebe Tullub, Kirstin E. Bettb, Bert Vandenbergb and Daryl J. Somersc

a Department of Horticulture, Room 259, Horticulture Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
b Crop Development Centre/Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5A8
c Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Cereal Research Centre, 195 Dafoe Rd., Winnipeg, MB, Canada, R3T 2M9


Figure 1
View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Examples of the segregation of A001 and A004 markers on the F2 progeny.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (79K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparison of mean lodging score of marker classes for individual markers, across eight populations.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean lodging score of marker combination classes across eight populations. T4: [A001(–) A004(–)] was omitted in Populations 1, 6, 7, and 9 because of a lack of F2:3 families in those populations

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Distribution of F3 families from two unselected populations on the basis of their lodging score in the 2003 field trial at Outlook, SK. Lodging score of 4 (vertical line) was used as the threshold value for phenotypic selection for lodging resistance.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.