Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 24 January 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:264-272 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Annicchiarico, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veronesi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Annicchiarico, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veronesi, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Annicchiarico, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veronesi, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources

Cultivar Adaptation across Italian Locations in Four Turfgrass Species

Paolo Annicchiaricoa,*, Luigi Russib, Efisio Pianoa and Fabio Veronesib

a C.R.A.–Istituto Sperimentale per le Colture Foraggere, 29 viale Piacenza, 26900 Lodi, Italy
b Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale e Biotecnologie Agroambientali e Zootecniche, Univ. degli Studi di Perugia, 74 Borgo XX Giugno, 06100 Perugia, Italy


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Geographic position of test locations.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Nominal predicted turf quality rating (1 to 9, 9 = highest) of top-performing genotypes as a function of the site score on the first GL interaction PC axis (showed by a black triangle), for four turfgrass species.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Nominal predicted turf density of top-performing genotypes as a function of the site score on the first GL interaction PC axis (showed by a black triangle), for two turfgrass species.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Mean value across genotypes of nominal predicted turf quality rating (1 to 9, 9 = highest) and turf density for three subspecies of red fescue as a function of the site score on the first GL interaction PC axis (showed by a black triangle).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Cluster analysis of test locations performed on significant GL interaction PC scores of sites for turf quality rating and turf density of four turfgrass species (see Table 1 for acronym of location).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.