Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:2583-2590 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boe, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boe, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boe, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Biomass Production of Switchgrass in Central South Dakota

D. K. Lee and A. Boe*

Plant Science Dep., South Dakota State University, NPB244, Box 2140-C, Brookings, SD 57007



View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Pattern of precipitation and cultivar and harvest date effects on biomass production of two switchgrass cultivars for 4 yr at Site 1 on the Dakota Lakes Research Farm in central South Dakota. Means with same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (a: 2001, significant cultivar x harvest date interaction; b: 2002; c: 2003, significant harvest date main effect; d: 2004, significant cultivar x harvest date interaction).

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Pattern of precipitation and cultivar and harvest date effects on biomass production of two switchgrass cultivars for 2 yr at Site 2 on the Dakota Lakes Research Farm in central South Dakota. Means with same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (a: 2003, significant harvest date main effect; b: 2004, significant cultivar x harvest date interaction).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationships between maximum annual biomass production of two switchgrass cultivars and April and May precipitation for 2001 through 2004 at Site 1 on the Dakota Lakes Research Farm in central South Dakota. Each point is the mean of four observations.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Individual tiller weight (a) and weight of stem (b) and inflorescence (c) fractions of tillers from two switchgrass cultivars (CIR = Cave-In-Rock, DAC = Dacotah) at three harvest dates during 2004 at two sites on the Dakota Lakes Research Farm in central South Dakota.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Dry matter partitioning coefficients for stem (STPRC, a) and inflorescence (INPRC, b) components of tillers from two switchgrass cultivars (CIR = Cave-In-Rock, DAC = Dacotah) at three harvest dates during 2004 at two sites on the Dakota Lakes Research Farm in central South Dakota.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.