Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 September 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:2337-2345 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahan, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mauget, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mahan, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mauget, S. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mahan, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mauget, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Temperature Stress
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

Antioxidant Metabolism in Cotton Seedlings Exposed to Temperature Stress in the Field

James R. Mahan* and Steven A. Mauget

USDA-ARS, Plant Stress and Water Conservation Lab., 3810 4th St, Lubbock, TX 79415



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Air temperatures measured over the interval 14 May to 23 June 2003 (a) and 2004 (b) at Lubbock, TX. Average temperature for 15-min intervals was measured with a thermocouple. Horizontal lines at 15°C and 33°C indicate thresholds for low and high temperature stresses.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Levels of malondialdehyde (nmol g–1 fresh wt.) in cotton tissues from early planting (DOY 113) in 2003 and late plantings (DOY 133) in 2003 and 2004 at Lubbock, TX. Each data point represents a minimum of 3 samples. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Levels of glutathione (µg gfw–1) in cotton tissues from late plantings (DOY 133) in 2003 (a) and 2004 (b) at Lubbock, TX. Bar increments indicate amount of oxidized and reduced glutathione and the total pool size is represented by the aggregate of the two. Each data point represents a minimum of three samples. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Activity of glutathione reductase (units gfw–1) in cotton tissues from early planting (DOY 113) in 2003 and late plantings (DOY 133) in 2003 and 2004 at Lubbock, TX. A unit of activity is the amount of enzyme that will catalyze the reduction of 1 µmol of GSSG per min at 25°C. Each data point represents a minimum of three samples. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Activity of ascorbate peroxidase (units gfw–1) in cotton tissues from early planting (DOY 113) in 2003 and late plantings (DOY 133) in 2003 and 2004 at Lubbock, TX. A unit of ascorbate peroxidase is defined as the amount necessary to oxidize 1 µmole of ascorbate per minute at 25°C (290-nm extinction coeffcient = 2.8 mM–1 cm–1). Each data point represents a minimum of three samples. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.