Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 September 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:2218-2227 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oraby, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sticklen, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oraby, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sticklen, M. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Oraby, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sticklen, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

Barley HVA1 Gene Confers Salt Tolerance in R3 Transgenic Oat

Hesham F. Oraby, Callista B. Ransom, Alexandra N. Kravchenko and Mariam B. Sticklen*

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., Plant and Soil Science Bldg., East Lansing, MI 48824



View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. R3 transgenic seedlings after in vitro selection.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. PCR amplification of the bar (0.59 kb) and HVA1 (0.7 kb) genes shows the presence of the transgenes in R3 for the five lines. Lane 1: 100-bp ladder marker, Lane 2: plasmid (positive control), Lane 3: nontransformed (negative control), and Lanes 4–8: transgenic lines.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. GUS expression in R3 transgenic oat seed husks (a), seeds (b), and root segments (c)

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Top; pBY520 partial map, bottom; Southern blot (a) and Northern blot (b) analyses showing bands for R3 of transgenic oat plants digested with HindIII, M: ladder marker; P: plasmid BY520; Lanes 1–5: Ogle BRA-82, Ogle BRA-17, Ogle BRA-8, Ogle BRA-19, Ogle BRA-41 respectively; C: nontransgenic control.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The effect of increasing NaCl concentrations on number of days to heading (a), plant height (b), flag leaf area (c), root length (d), panicle length (e), and number of spikelets/panicle (f) for the transgenic lines and the nontransgenic control.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. R3 transgenic oat (a) and nontransgenic (b) at 150 mM NaCl stress.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. R3 transgenic (a) and nontransgenic (b) oat roots at 100 mM NaCl stress.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.