Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 August 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1778-1785 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Karcher, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Karcher, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Karcher, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population among Diverse Maturity Groups

II. Light Interception and Utilization

Jeffrey T. Edwardsa, Larry C. Purcellb,* and Douglas E. Karcherc

a Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State Univ., 368 Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078
b Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, 1366 W Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
c Dep. of Horticulture, Univ. of Arkansas, Plant Science Building, Fayetteville, AR 72703



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. General response curve of yield, biomass, relative yield, and relative biomass (dependent variables) to cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) from emergence to R6. The asymptote is calculated as the sum of ß0 and {alpha} coefficients, and ß1 describes the responsiveness of Y to increasing CIPAR.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Response of harvest index to cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) from emergence to R6 for MG 00 through VI soybean sown at different population densities at Fayetteville, AR, in 2001, 2002, and 2003.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relative above-ground biomass at (A) harvest and (B) relative soybean yield responses to cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) from emergence to R6 for MG 00 through VI soybean sown at different population densities at Fayetteville, AR, in 2001, 2002, and 2003. Relative values are expressed as a fraction of the highest yielding combination of cultivar and seeding density within a given year.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between soybean plant population (PP) and cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) for soybean requiring 80, 90, 100, or 110 d from emergence to R6 (DTR6). Isolines represent CIPAR predicted by the equation CIPAR = –585 + 2.49(PP) + 16(DTR6) – 0.0027(PP2) – 0.037(DTR62) – 0.0058(PP x DTR6). Horizontal lines indicate CIPAR necessary to obtain 90 and 95% of asymptotic relative yield as described by Eq. [2].

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.