Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 August 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1764-1769 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bruening, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bruening, W. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bruening, W. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism

Shade and Temporal Distribution of Pod Production and Pod Set in Soybean

Dennis B. Egli* and William P. Bruening

Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0312



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The effect of continuous shade on pod production profiles (each data point represents the number of pods ≥ 10 mm long that were marked on that date). Bars represent, for each treatment, the average standard error of the mean after excluding means approaching zero. Shade treatments were applied at approximately growth stage R1 and maintained until maturity. Times of reproductive growth stages R1, R3, R5, and R6 are shown on the x axis.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The effect of continuous-shade treatments on surviving pod profiles (marked pods that were full size and contained at least one developed seed at maturity). For each treatment, bars represent the average standard error of the mean after excluding means approaching zero. Shade treatments were applied at approximately growth stage R1 and maintained until maturity. Times of reproductive growth stages R1, R3, R5, and R6 are shown on the x axis.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The effect of large changes in the radiation environment midway in the flowering and pod set period on pod production (each data point represents the number of pods ≥ 10 mm long that were marked on that date) profiles. Bars represent, for each treatment, the average standard error of the mean after excluding means approaching zero. The arrows indicate when plants in the transfer treatments were moved into and out of shade. Times of reproductive growth stages R1, R3, R5, and R6 are shown on the x axis.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The effect of large changes in the radiation environment midway in the flowering and pod set period on surviving pods (marked pods that were full size and contained at least one developed seed at maturity) profiles. Bars represent, for each treatment, the average standard error of the mean after excluding means approaching zero. The arrows indicate when plants in the transfer treatments were moved into and out of the shade. Times of reproductive growth stages R1, R3, R5, and R6 are shown on the x axis.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.