Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 May 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1379-1386 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Canola
Right arrow Temperature Stress

Root Temperature and Aeration Effects on the Protein Profile of Canola Leaves

Jennifer A. Franklina,*, Nat N. V. Kavb, William Yajimab and David M. Reidc

a Dep. of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, 274 Ellington Plant Sciences Bldg., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563
b Dep. of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5
c Dep. of Biological Sciences, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N6



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Shoot and root fresh weights and (b) leaf area of canola plants treated for 12 d with roots aerated at 24/18°C (day/night; control) or 10/10°C (cold), or not aerated at 24/18°C (hypoxic) or 10/10°C (cold + hypoxic). Standard errors are indicated. n = 16.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Midday transpiration rates of canola plants treated for 12 d with roots aerated at 10/10°C (day/night), or nonaerated at 24/18 or 10/10°C. Upper and lower limits of control (24/18°C) 95% confidence interval are shown. n = 12.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Shoot and root concentrations of (a) total soluble sugars and (b) starch of canola plants treated for 12 d with roots aerated at 24/18°C (day/night; control) or 10/10°C (cold), or not aerated at 24/18°C (hypoxic) or 10/10°C (cold + hypoxic). Standard errors are indicated. n = 14.

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (13%)–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel images showing the protein profiles of (A) the control, and (B, C, D) the treated (hypoxic, cold, and hypoxic + cold, respectively) canola samples. The numbers indicate the protein spots that were reproducibly affected by exposure to the stresses.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.