Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 May 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1120-1131 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckenberger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Melchinger, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heckenberger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Melchinger, A. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heckenberger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Melchinger, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines

I. Simple Sequence Repeat Data from Maize Inbreds

M. Heckenbergera, M. Bohnb and A. E. Melchingera,*

a Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population Genetics, Univ. of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
b Crop Science Dep., Univ. of Illinois, S-110 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cumulative frequency distributions of GD(P1,O) for F2–, BC1–, and BC2–derived progenies based on simulated data assuming GD(P1,P2) = 0. Type I ({alpha}) and Type II (ß) errors refer to a threshold of GD = 0.37 for discriminating F2– vs. BC1–derived progeny lines.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Standard errors of pairwise genetic distances (GDs) and their corresponding GD values observed for 220 maize inbred lines with 100 simple sequence repeats.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Histograms of estimated (columns) and simulated (curve) parental contributions (p) for F2– and BC1–derived progeny lines. Means of estimated () and simulated [µ(p-sim)] values are indicated by dotted and dashed lines, respectively.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Histograms of Rogers' genetic distances calculated from simple sequence repeat data between unrelated (f = 0) lines from European Flint and Dent lines as well as parents of introgression lines. Variables n, µ, and SD refer to the number of values, arithmetic mean, and the standard deviation of GD values for the particular distribution, respectively. Means are indicated by solid lines.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Cumulative histograms (columns) and approximated ß distributions (curves) for genetic distances based on 100 simple sequence repeats for F2–, BC1–, and BC2–derived progenies. Variables n, µ, and SD refer to the number of values, arithmetic mean, and the standard deviation of genetic distance values for the particular distribution, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.