Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:297-304 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Volenec, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Volenec, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Volenec, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Alfalfa
Right arrow Plant Nutrition

Influence of Phosphorus and Potassium on Alfalfa Yield and Yield Components

W. K. Berg, S. M. Cunningham, S. M. Brouder, B. C. Joern, K. D. Johnson, J. Santini and J. J. Volenec*

Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., 915 West State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Influence of P and K fertilizer application on yield in 1998, 1999, and 2000. Contour plots are generated from the regression equations listed in Table 5 for total yield.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Relationship between forage yield and mass shoot–1 at the first (May 1998) and last (Sept. 2000) harvests of the study.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Regression of log of herbage mass plant–1 vs. log of plants m–2 as influenced by P (A) and K (B) fertilization in Harvest 1 (May) of 2000. Slopes of regression equations designated with the same letter are not different (P < 0.05). Data presented in Fig. 3A are averaged across the K fertilizer treatments, while data presented in Fig. 3B are averaged across the P fertilizer treatments.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.