Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:251-258 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Salinity
Right arrow Turfgrass
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Criteria for Assessing Salinity Tolerance of the Halophytic Turfgrass Seashore Paspalum

Geungjoo Lee, Robert N. Carrow* and Ronny R. Duncan

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA30223-1797


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Growth responses of shoot dry weight of more tolerant (SI 93-1 and SI 92) and less tolerant (Adalayd) seashore paspalums at different salinity levels. Bars represent standard errors of the mean (n = 6).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Growth responses of total plant (shoot + root + verdure) of more tolerant (SI 93-1 and SI 92) and less tolerant (Adalayd) seashore paspalums at different salinity levels. Bars represent standard errors of the mean (n = 6).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Comparison of absolute shoot dry weight (g) (A: top) and relative shoot dry weight (%) (B: bottom) of more tolerant (SI 91) and less tolerant (SIPV 43-2) seashore paspalums. Bars represent standard errors of the mean (n = 6).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.