Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burner, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burner, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burner, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Agricultural Systems

Diurnal Effects on Nutritive Value of Alley-Cropped Orchardgrass Herbage

D. M. Burnera,* and D. P. Beleskyb

a USDA-ARS, Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, 6883 S. State Hwy 23, Booneville, AR 72927
b USDA-ARS, Appalachian Farming Systems Research Center, 1224 Airport Road, Beaver, WV



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diurnal change in mean solar irradiance ({lambda} 0.35–2.5 µm) in control (unshaded), and loblolly and shortleaf pine microsites. Data were collected from 0500 to 1930 h (CST) on 1 to 15 June 2000 and 2001. Prediction equations for solar reception were Y = –0.045T – 0.013T2 + 6.60 x 10–3T3 – 5.57 x 10–4T4 + 1.33 x 10–5T5, R2 = 0.99; Y = 0.024T – 0.028T2 + 6.38 x 10–3T3 – 4.58 x 10–4T4 + 1.03 x 10–5T5, R2 = 0.96; Y = 0.018T – 0.034T2 + 8.61 x 10–3T3 – 6.47 x 10–4T4 + 1.50 x 10–5T5, R2 = 0.97 for control, loblolly pine, and shortleaf pine, respectively. T = time (h), CST. Vertical bar indicates LSD (P = 0.05).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diurnal change in total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) in orchardgrass herbage from control (unshaded), and loblolly and shortleaf pine microsites sampled on 1 through 15 June 2001 and 2002. T = time (h), CST. The error bar at data points indicates standard error of the mean (n = 30).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Diurnal change in water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) in orchardgrass herbage sampled on 1 through 15 June 2001 and 2002. T = time (h), CST. The error bar at data points indicates standard error of the mean (n = 90).

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Diurnal change in starch concentration in orchardgrass herbage sampled on 1 through 15 June 2001 and 2002. T = time (h), CST. The error bar at data points indicates standard error of the mean (n = 90).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.