Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, H. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Biofuels

Biomass and Carbon Partitioning in Switchgrass

A. B. Frank*, J. D. Berdahl, J. D. Hanson, M. A. Liebig and H. A. Johnson

USDA-ARS, Box 459, Hwy 6 S., Mandan, ND 58554



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Changes in biomass of leaves, stems, senesced leaves and stems, litter, and total biomass for Dacotah and Sunburst switchgrass on eight sample dates averaged over 2000, 2001, and 2002. Some tests for significance are presented in Table 1.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes in C content in leaves, stems, senesced leaves and stems, litter, and total biomass for Dacotah and Sunburst switchgrass on eight sample dates averaged over 2000, 2001, and 2002. Some tests for significance are presented in Table 2.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Root biomass in increments to 1.1-m depth for Dacotah and Sunburst switch sampled in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Data for increments 0.3 to 0.6 m, 0.6 to 0.9 m, and 0.9 to 1.1 m were partitioned into 0.1 m increments to better illustrate trends in root biomass with soil depth. Horizontal bars are standard errors of the mean.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil CO2 flux for Dacotah and Sunburst switchgrass on 10 dates in 2000, nine dates in 2001, and 11 dates in 2002. Measurements were made from early May to late October as indicated by the first letter of the month above the x axis. Vertical bars are standard errors of the mean.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Total soil organic carbon content to 0.9-m soil depth for switchgrass in 2000, 2001, and 2002. The F-test evaluated by SAS PROC MIXED model was significant for years at the 0.05 level, but nonsignificant for cultivars and cultivars x years.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.